Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology

Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-258

  Laurillard, Diana ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNESCO Institute for Information Technology in Education   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909070805     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203125083     Document Type: Book

References (377)

1. Abercrombie, M. L. J. (1979). The anatomy of judgment. London: Penguin
2. Ackermann, E. (1991). Perspective-taking and object constriction: Two keys to learning. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 25-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
3. Agapiou, A., Maharg, P., & Nicol, E. (2010). Construction and constructivism: Learning contract management and administration via simulated transactions. CEBE Transactions, 7(2), 37-54
4. Agostinho, S. (2006). The use of a visual learning design representation to document and communicate teaching ideas. Paper presented at the 23rd annual Ascilite Conference
5. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198
6. Alessi, S. (2000). Designing educational support in system-dynamics-based interactive learning environments. Simulation & Gaming, 31(2), 178-196
7. Aleven, V.A.W.M.M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179
8. Alexander, S. (2004). Learners creating the learning environment. In M. Selnger (Ed.), Connected schools: Essays from international thought leaders in education (pp. 26-33). London: Premium Publishing
9. Amhag, L., & Jakobsson, A. (2009). Collaborative learning as a collective competence when students use the potential of meaning in asynchronous dialogues. Computers & Education, 52, 656-667
10. Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Ainsworth, S., & Crook, C. (2009). Personal Inquiry: linking the cultures of home and school with technology mediated science inquiry. In N. Pachler & J. Seipold (Eds.), Mobile learning cultures across education, work and leisure; Proceedings of the 3rd WLE Mobile Learning Symposium: Work-Based Learning for Education Centre
11. Anderson, C. (1984). Enabling and shaping understanding through tutorials. In F. Marton, D. Entwistle & D. Hounsell (Eds.), The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press
12. Apedoe, X. S., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). Inquiry-based learning and digital libraries in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 321-330
13. Apedoe, X. S., Walker, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). Integrating inquiry-based learning into undergraduate geology. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3), 414-421
14. Ausubel, D. P. (1980). Schemata, cognitive structure, and advance organizers: A reply to Anderson, Spiro, and Anderson. American Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 400-404
15. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer
16. Avgeriou, P., Papasalouros, A., Retalis, S., & Skordalakis, M. (2003). Towards a pattern language for learning management systems. Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 11-24
17. Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. New York: Elsevier Science
18. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology ofhuman agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180
19. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead, UK.: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education
20. Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learninganddistanceeducation, 2nd edition. London: Routledge
21. Beaty, E., Gibbs, G., & Morgan, A. (1997). Learning orientations and study contracts. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning, 2nd edition (pp. 72-88). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press (now only available at www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/EoL.html)
22. Becta (2006). The Becta Review 2006: Evidence on the progress of ICT in education. Coventry, UK: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency
23. Becta (2008). Harnessing Technology Review 2008: The role oftechnology and its impact on education. Coventry, UK. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency
24. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for the digital age. London: Routledge
25. Bergin, J. (2002). Fourteen pedagogical patterns. Pedagogical Patterns Project. http://csis.pace.edu/∼bergin
26. Beynon, M., & Roe, C. (2004) Computer support for constructionism in context. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’04)
27. Biggs, J. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12(1), 73-85
28. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE/OUP
29. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 325-341
30. Bok, D. C. (2006). Our under-achieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press
31. Bonk, C. J., & King, K. S. (Eds.). (1998). Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
32. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (4), 399-413
33. Boud, D., & Solomon, N. (2000). Work as the curriculum: Pedagogical and identity implications. Sydney, Australia: UTS Research Centre Vocational Education & Training
34. Boud, D., & Solomon, N. (Eds.). (2001). Work-based learning: A new higher education? Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE
35. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426
36. Boyle, T. (2006). The design and development of second generation learning objects. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings ofEd-Media 2006, world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia & telecommunications. Orlando, Florida
37. Boyle, T. (2008). The design of learning objects for pedagogical impact. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), The handbook ofresearch on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies. Hershey: Information Science Reference
38. Boyle, T. (2010). Introduction to JIME special issue on Open Educational Resources (OER). Journal of Interactive Media in Education (http://jime.open.ac.uk/issue/2010-0ER)
39. Bransford, J. A., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2003). Howpeople learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press
40. Bransford, J., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Meltzoff, A., Pea, R., Roschelle, J., Vye, N., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Barron, B., Reeves, B., & Sabelli, N. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
41. Bravo, C., van Joolingen, W., & de Jong, T. (2009). Using Co-Lab to build System Dynamics models: Students’ actions and on-line tutorial advice. Computers & Education, 53, 243-251
42. Brennan, J., & Little, B. (1996). A review ofwork based learning in higher education. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment
43. Britain, S. (2007). Learning design systems: Current and future developments. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinkingpedagogyfor a digital age (pp. 103-115). New York: Routledge
44. Brown, D. (1992). Using examples to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 17-34
45. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42
46. Bruner, J. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32
47. Bruns, A., & Humphreys, S. (2005). Wikis in teaching and assessment: The M/Cyclopedia Project. Paper presented at the Proceedings International Wiki Symposium, San Diego
48. Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., & Gerlits, B. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 23-41
49. Butcher, C., Davies, C., & Highton, M. (2006). Designing learning: From module outline to effective teaching. London: Routledge
50. Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: Identification and intervention. ZDM Mathematics Education Special issue on Cognitive neuroscience and mathematics learning, 42(6), 527-539
51. CEC. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities. Education, research and innovation. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities
52. Charlton, P., & Magoulas, G. (2010a). Self-configurable framework for enabling context-aware learning design. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems, London
53. Charlton, P., & Magoulas, G. D. (2010b). Autonomic computing and ontologies to enable context-aware learning design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Arras, France
54. Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 334-352
55. Chi, M. T H, & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & M. L. (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer
56. Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeo, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional science, 33, 483-511
57. Cifuentes, L., and K. L. Murphy. (1997). Design considerations for computer conferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 177-202
58. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257
59. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13
60. Coll, R. K., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2006). Perceptions of desirable graduate competencies for science and technology new graduates. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(1), 29-58
61. Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research (pp. 289-298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
62. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42
63. Conole, G., & Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (http://jime.open.ac.uk/2005/08)
64. Conole, G., & Weller, M. (2007). The Open University Learning Design Project. In L. Cameron, A. Voerman & J. Dalziel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 European LAMS Conference: Designing the future of learning (pp. 65-72). Greenwich: LAMS Foundation
65. Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers and Education, 43(1-2), 17-33
66. Conole, G., Scanlon, E., Kerawalla, L., Mulholland, P., Anastopoulou, S., & Blake, C. (2008). From design to narrative: The development of inquiry-based learning models. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA
67. Cook, J., Bradley, C., Lance, J., Smith, C., & Haynes, R. (2007). Generating learning contexts with mobile devices. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda. Occasional Papers in Work-based Learning 1 (pp. 25-38). London: WLE Centre for Excellence
68. Coombs, G., & El den, M. (2004). Introduction to the special issue: Problem-based learning as social inquiry-PBL and management. Journal of Management Education, 28, 523-535
69. Copley, J. (2007). Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: production and evaluation of student use. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44(4), 387-399
70. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist 18, 88-108
71. Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C.-J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: Graduates’ perceptions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(2), 147-165
72. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105-122
73. Crook, C. (1996). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning: A psychological perspective. London: Routledge
74. Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49-55
75. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial
76. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
77. Cutts, Q., Kennedy, G., Mitchell, C., & Draper, S. (2004). Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems. Paper presented at the IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology, Hawaii
78. Dallimore, E., Hertenstein, H., & Platt, M. (2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: Student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53(1)
79. Dalsgaard, C., & Godsk, M. (2007). Transforming traditional lectures into problem- based blended learning: Challenges and experiences. Open Learning, 22(1), 29-42
80. Dalziel, J. R. (2003). Implementing learning design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). Paper presented at the ASCILITE, Adelaide, Australia
81. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. (2001). Classical conditioning and reinforcement learning. In P. Dayan & L. Abbott (Eds.), Theoretical neuroscience (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
82. de Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). Pedagogic strategies supporting the use of Synchronous Audiographic Conferencing: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 980-998
83. de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46, 249-264
84. de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201
85. De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: The impact of role assignment and self-assessment on students’ levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 177-188
86. Dede, C. (2005). Planning for “neomillennial” learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. In J. Oblinger & D. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 226-247). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Publishers
87. Derntl, M., Neumann, S., & Oberhuemer, P. (2009). Report on the standardized description of instructional models. ECP 2007EDU417007
88. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi
89. Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and education. Hazleton, PA: The Pennsylvania State University
90. Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439-451
91. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Computational and cognitive approaches. Oxford: Elsevier
92. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In Kirschner, P. A. (Ed.), Inaugural address, Three Worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Open University of the Netherlands
93. Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121-151
94. Dillenbourg, P., Jarvela, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & L. Montandon (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning. Principles and products. Berlin: Springer
95. diSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning and literacy. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press
96. diSessa, A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The JournaloftheLearningSciences, 13(1), 77-103
97. Donald, C., Blake, A., Girault, I., Datt, A., & Ramsey, E. (2009). Approaches to learning design: Past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter. Distance Education, 30(2), 179-199
98. Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: Strategies for using web 2.0 in teaching and learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(2), 119-130
99. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. (Eds.). (1992). Constructivism and the technology ofinstruction: A conversation. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
100. Duffy, T. M., & Kirkley, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
101. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3-47
102. Durbridge, N. (1984). Using audio-vision to teach mathematics. In E. Henderson & N. Nathenson (Eds.), Independent learning in higher education. Inglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications
103. Dysthe, O. (2002). The learning potential of a web-mediated discussion in a university course. Studies in HigherEducation, 27(3), 339-352
104. Edwards, S. L., & Bruce, C. S. (2004). The assignment that triggered change: Assessment and the relational learning model for generic capabilities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 141-157
105. Ellis, R. A., Calvo, R., Levy, D., & Tan, K. (2004). Learning through discussions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(1), 73-93
106. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22, 244-256
107. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Hara, A., & Prosser, M. (2007). The university student experience of face-to-face and online discussions: Coherence, reflection and meaning. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 15(1), 83-97
108. Entwistle, N. (2005). Learning outcomes and ways of thinking across contrasting disciplines and settings in higher education. Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 67-82
109. Entwistle, N., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 321-342
110. Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-36345
111. Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407-428
112. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning enviroments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. de Corte, L. BVerschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd
113. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247-273
114. Ertl, B., Kopp B., & Mandel H. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning in videoconferencing using collaboration scripts and content schemes. Scripting Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning 6(3): 213-23
115. Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education 50, 491-498
116. Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., Ally, M., Cookson, P., Keller, V., & Prosser, F. (2000). The development and testing of a tool for analysis of computer mediated conferencing transcripts. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 85-88
117. Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72
118. Foucault, M., Kritzman, L. D., & Sheridan, A. (1990). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977-1984. New York, NY: Routledge
119. Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education Research and Development, 50, 645-664
120. Frith, C. D. (2007). Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
121. Frith, U. (2011). Neuroscience: Implications for education and lifelong learning. London: Royal Society Working Group
122. Fry, H. (2009). A handbookfor teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. London: Taylor & Francis
123. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (Eds.). (2003). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. London: Kogan Page
124. Fung, Y. Y. H. (2005). Teachers’ views on and use of printed materials in a distance learning teacher education course. Open Learning, 20(2), 175-183
125. Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 136-148
126. Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
127. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications
128. Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions ofquality. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy
129. Gilbert, P. K., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5-18
130. Gonzalez, J., & Wagenaar, R. (2005). Tuning educational structures in Europe II: Universities’ contribution to the bologna process. Bilbao, Spain: University of Deusto
131. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82-101
132. Goodyear, P., & Yang, D. F. (2009). Patterns and pattern languages in educational design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Vol 1 (pp. 167-187). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference
133. Green, S., Jones, R., Pearson, E., & Gkatzidou, S. (2006). Accessibility and adaptability of learning objects: Responding to metadata, learning patterns and profiles of needs and preferences. ALT-J, 14(1), 117-129
134. Grunwald, S., Ramasundaram, V., Bruland, G. L., & Jesseman, D. K. (2007). Expanding distance education in the spatial sciences through virtual learning entities and a virtual GIS computer laboratory. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 5(1), 54-69
135. Haggis, T. (2004). Meaning, identity and ‘motivation’: Expanding what matters in understanding learning in higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 29(3), 335-352
136. Haggis, T., & Pouget, M. (2002). Trying to be motivated: Perspectives on learning from younger students accessing higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 7 (3), 323-336
137. Hague, D. (1991). Beyond universities: A new republic ofthe intellect. London: Institute of Economic Affairs
138. Hannon, P., Umble, K. E., Alexander, L., Francisco, D., Steckler, A., Tudor, G., et al. (2002). Gagne and Laurillard’s models of instruction applied to distance education: A theoretically driven evaluation of an online curriculum in public health. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2), 1-16
139. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152
140. Harasim, L. (1987). Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16 (2), 117-135
141. Harasim, L. (1989). Online education: A new domain. In R. Mason and A. Kaye (Eds.) Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon
142. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1-32
143. Hassanien, A. (2006). Using Webquest to support learning with technology in higher education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 5(1), 41-49
144. Henri, F. (1995). Distance learning and computer-mediated communication: Interactive, quasi-interactive or monologue? In C. O’Malley(Ed.) Computer supported collaborative learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
145. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, C. T. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59-71
146. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, C. T. (2006). Authentic tasks online: A synergy among learner, task and technology. Distance Education, 27(2), 233-248
147. Herrington, J., Reeves, C. T., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2007). Designing authentic activities in web-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 3-29
148. Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87-92
149. Hevner, A. R. (2009). Interview with Alan R. Hevner on “Design Science”. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1, 126-129
150. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41, 397-420
151. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266
152. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2006). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107
153. Honkimaki, S., Tynjl, P., & Valkonen, S. (2004). University students’ study orientations, learning experiences and study success in innovative courses. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 431-449
154. Horgan, J. (2003). In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge & S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbookfor teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (pp. 75-90). London: Kogan Page
155. Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (2005) Enhancing teaching and learning environments in undergraduate courses. Final Report to the Economic and Social Research Council on TLRP Project L139251099. www.ed.ac.uk/etl/
156. Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(1), 55-67
157. Illich, I. (1973). Toolsfor conviviality. New York, NY: Harper and Row
158. Ingram, A. L., Hathorn, L. G., & Evans, A. (2000). Beyond chat on the internet. Computers & Education, 35, 21-35
159. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. (pp. 205-226). Dordrecht: Kluwer
160. Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, “reading”, and “writing” for the 21st century’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331
161. Jewitt, C. (2008). The visual in learningand creativity: A review ofthe literature. London: Arts Council
162. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Vol. II (pp. 215-239). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
163. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44, 395-408
164. Jones, R. H. (2009). Technology and sites of display. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), TheRoutledge handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge
165. Kafai, Y., & Resnik, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
166. Kalas, I. (2010). Recognizing thepotential ofICT in early childhood education: Analytical survey. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education
167. Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. R. (2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 30-49
168. Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260-271
169. Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17-27
170. Kayes, B. A., Kayes, C. D., & Kolb, A. D. (2005). Experiential learning in teams. Simulation and Gaming, 36(3), 330-354
171. Kear, K. (2004). Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education. OpenLearning, 19(2), 151-164
172. Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2006). Characterising a teaching and learning environment conducive to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 185-198
173. Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24
174. Kiili, K. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 394-404
175. Kinchin, I. (2006). Developing PowerPoint handouts to support meaningful learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 647-650
176. King, A. (2007). Structuring peer interaction to promote higher-order thinking and complex learning in cooperating groups. Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6(1): 13-37
177. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86
178. Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 1042-1629
179. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hamalainen, R., Hakkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2 (2), 211-224
180. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212
181. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
182. Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
183. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, W. F. (2006). Collaboration scripts - A conceptual analysis. EducationalPsychologyReview 18, 159-185
184. Koohang, A. (2004). Students’ perceptions toward the use of the digital library in weekly web-based distance learning assignments portion of a hybrid programme. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 617-626
185. Kriz, C. W. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation and Gaming, 34(4), 495-511
186. Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, (2nd Edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
187. LAMS. Learning Activity Management System. (http://lamsfoundation.org/
188. Laurillard, D. (1987). The different forms of learning in psychology and education. In J. Richardson, M. Eysenck & D. Warren-Piper (Eds.), Student learning. Guidlford, Surrey: SRHE
189. Laurillard, D. (1991). Mediating the message: Television programme design and students’ understanding. Instructional Science, 20(1), 3-23
190. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversationalframeworkfor the effective use of learning technologies, 2nd edition. London: RoutledgeFalmer
191. Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms of moblie learning: Framing research questions. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (Vol. 1). Occasional papers in Work-based Learning. London:WLE Centre, Institute of Education
192. Laurillard, D. (2008). Open teaching: The key to sustainable and effective open education. In T. Iiyoshi & M. S. Vijay Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Boston: MIT Press
193. Laurillard, D. (2008a). Digital technologies and their role in achieving our ambitionsfor education. London: Institute of Education
194. Laurillard, D. (2008b). Open teaching: The key to sustainable and effective open education. In T. Iiyoshi & M. S. Vijay Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Boston: MIT Press
195. Laurillard, D. (2008c). Technology enhanced learning as a tool for pedagogical innovation. Journal of the Philosophy of Education. New Philosophies of Learning: Special Issue 42(3-4): 521-533
196. Laurillard, D. (2008d). The teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 139-154
197. Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 5-20
198. Laurillard, D. (2010). Effective use of technology in teaching and learning in HE. In Peterson, Baker & McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Elsevier. 4: 419-426
199. Laurillard, D. (2011). Cost-benefit modelling for open learning. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education
200. Laurillard, D., & Ljubojevic, D. (2011). Evaluating learning designs through the formal representation of pedagogical patterns. In C. Kohls & J. W. Wedekind (Eds.), Investigations of e-learning patterns: Context factors, problems and solutions (pp. 86-105). Hershey, PA: IGI Global
201. Laurillard, D., & Masterman, E. (2009). TPD as online collaborative learning for innovation in teaching. In O. Lindberg & A. D. Olofsson (Eds.), Online learning communities and teaching professional development: Methods for improved educational delivery. Berlin: Springer: 230-246
202. Laurillard, D., & McAndrew, P. (2003). Reusable educational software: A basis for generic learning activities. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online eesources: A sustainable approach to e-learning. London: Kogan Page
203. Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., Luckin, R., Plowman, L., & Taylor, J. (2000). Affordances for learning in a non-linear narrative medium. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2 (www-jime.open.ac.uk/00/2/laurillard-00-2-t.html)
204. Laurillard, D., Charlton, P., Craft, B., Dimakopoulos, D., Ljubojevic, D., Magoulas, G., Whittlestone, K. (in press). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (Accepted)
205. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
206. Lazzari, M. (2009). Creative use of podcasting in higher education and its effect on competitive agency. Computers & Education 52, 27-34
207. Leh, A. (2002). Action research on hybrid courses and their online communities. Educational Media International, 39, 31-38
208. Leitch, S. (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy-world class skills: Final Report. London: HM Treasury
209. Lesgold, A. (2009). Better schools for the 21st Century. Pittsburgh, PA: School of Education
210. Levasseur, D., & Sawyer, K. K. (2006). Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A research review of the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom. Review of Communication, 6(1&2), 101-123
211. Light, P., Colbourn C., & Light, C (1997). Computer-mediated tutorial support for conventional university courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13, 228-235
212. Lillejord, S., & Dysthe, O. (2008). Productive learning practice-a theoretical discussion based on two cases. Journal of Education and Work, 21(1), 75-89
213. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 103-126
214. Linn, M. C., & Hsi S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
215. Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137
216. Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2006). Cultural issues in the sharing and reuse of resources for learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(3), 269-284
217. Lo, M. L., Marton F., Pang, M. F., & Pong, W. Y. (2004). Toward a pedagogy of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
218. Lockwood, F. (1992). Activities in self-instructional texts. London: Kogan Page
219. Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, ELI Paper 1
220. Lowyck, J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2004). Instructional conceptions: Analysis from an instructional design perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 429-444
221. Lowyck, J., Lehtinen, E., & Elen, J. (2004). Students’ perspectives on learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 401-406
222. Luckin, R. (2003). Between the lines: Documenting the multiple dimensions of computer-supported collaborations. Computers & Education, 41, 379-396
223. Luckin, R., & du Boulay, B. (1999). Ecolab: The development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 198-220
224. Luckin, R., Plowman, L., Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., Taylor, J., & Corben, S. (2001). Narrative evolution: Learning from students’ talk about species variation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 100-123
225. Manguel, A. (1997). A history ofreading. London: Flamingo
226. Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). Globalisation and higher education. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 8. OECD Publishing
227. Marra, R., & Palmer, B. (2004). Encouraging intellectual growth: Senior college student profiles. Journal of Adult Development, 11(2), 111-122
228. Marsick, V. (2006). Informal strategic learning in the workplace. Work-Related learning, 1, 51-69
229. Martin, P. W. (2003). Key aspects of teaching and learning in arts, humanities and social sciences. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge & S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbookfor teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. London: Kogan Page
230. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200
231. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Marwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
232. Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193-220
233. Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2007). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 335-348
234. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11
235. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127
236. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
237. Marton, F., & Wenestam, C.-G. (1979). Qualitative differences in the understanding and retention of the main point in some texts based on the principle-example structure. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press
238. Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, D. (1997). The experience of learning, 2nd edition. Edinburgh. Scottish Academic Press (now only available at www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/EoL.html)
239. Mason, R. (2001). Effective facilitation of online learning: The Open University experience. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and Learning Online (pp. 67-75). London: Routledge
240. Mason, R. (2004). Learning and technology. Association for Learning Technology, Oxford Brookes University
241. Masterman, E., & Manton, M. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on digital tools for pedagogic planning and design. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2(2), (in press)
242. Masterman, L., & Vogel, M. (2007). Practices and processes of design for learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinkingpedagogyfor the digital age (pp. 52-63). London: Routledge
243. Matsuzawa, T. (2003). The Ai project: Historical and ecological contexts. Animal Cognition, 6, 199-211
244. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A newparadigm ofinstruc- tional theory (Vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
245. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
246. McAndrew, P., & Goodyear, P. (2007). Representing practitioner experiences through learning design and patterns. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinkingpedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 92-102). London: Routledge
247. McAndrew, P., & Weller, M. (2005). Applying learning design to supported open learning. In R. Koper & C. Tattersall (Eds.), Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. New York: Springer
248. McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2-3), 216-242
249. McConnell, D. (1998). Group communications via computer conferencing: The educational potential. In D. Smith (Ed.), New technologies and professional communications in education. London: National Council for Educational Technology
250. McNeill, D. P. (1992). Computer conferencing: the causes for delay. In M. D. Waggoner (Ed.) Empowering networks: Computer conferencing in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
251. Mellow, G. O., Woolis, D. D., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Teaching developmental education: In search of a new pedagogy. Change Magazine
252. Meyer, J. H. F. and R. Land (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education 49: 373-388
253. Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55-65
254. Milton, J., & Lyons, J. (2003). Evaluate to improve learning: Reflecting on the role of teaching and learning models. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(3), 297-312
255. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054
256. Mor, Y., & Winters, N. (2007). Design approaches in technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 61-75
257. Mor, Y., Winters, N., CeruHi, M., & Bjork, S. (2006). Learningpatternsfor the design and deployment of mathematical games: Literature review: Kaleidoscope Project, London Knowedge Lab, Institute of Education
258. Nalley, R. (1995). Designing computer-mediated conferencing into instruction. In Z. L. Berge and M. P. Collins (Eds.), Computer mediated communication and the online classroom, Volume II: Higher education. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
259. Nathoo, A. N., Goldhoff, P., & Quattrochi, J. J. (2005). Evaluation of an Interactive Case-based Online Network (ICON) in a problem based learning environment. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10(3), 215-230
260. NCIHE. (1997). Higher education in the learning society (No. NCIHE/97/850). London: HMSO
261. Neumann, S., & Oberhuemer, P. (2009). User evaluation of a graphical modeling tool for IMS learning design. In Advances in web based learning-ICWL 2009. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer
262. Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer Instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education 28(4), 457-473
263. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Mavrikis, M., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., & Pearce, D. (2009). Broadening the sense of ‘dynamic’: A microworld to support students’ mathematical generalisation. ZDM, 41(4), 493-503
264. Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. ScienceEducation, 86(4), 548-571
265. Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52, 147-153
266. OECD-CERI (2003). PISA 2003 Country Profiles. from www.pisa.oecd.org
267. Oliver, M., & Conole, G. (2002). Supporting structured change: toolkits for design and evaluation. In R. Macdonald (Ed.), Academic and educational development: Research, evaluation and changing practice in higher education (pp. 62-75). London: Kogan Page
268. Oliver, R. (2007). Exploring an inquiry-based learning approach with first-year students in a large undergraduate class. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 3-15
269. Oliver, R., Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Wills, S., & Agostinho, S. (2002). Formalising the description of learning designs. In A. Goody, J. Herrington & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and development in higher education (Vol. 25, pp. 496-504). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA
270. Osborne, M. (2003). Increasing or Widening Participation in Higher Education?—;a European overview. European Journal of Education, 38(1), 5-24
271. Otten, M. (2003). Intercultural learning and diversity in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education 7(1), 12-26
272. Palmer, B., & Marra, R. (2004). College student epistemological perspectives across knowledge domains: A proposed grounded theory. Higher Education, 47, 311-335
273. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Brighton, Sussex: The Harvester Press
274. Papert, S. (1996). The connectedfamily: Bridging the digital generation gap. Marietta, GA: Longstreet Press
275. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985-1990. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp
276. Paquette, G., Marino, O., Teja, I. D. l., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Léonard, M., & Contamines, J. (2005). Implementation and deployment of the IMS learning design specification. Canadian Journal ofLearningand Technology, 31(2)
277. Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology. Amsterdam: Elsevier
278. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451
279. Perkins, D. (1991). Educating for insight. Educational Leadership, 49, 4-8
280. Perry, W. G. (1988). Different worlds in the same classroom. In P. Ramsden (Ed.) Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 145-161). London: Kogan Page
281. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms ofintellectual and ethical development in the collegeyears. New York: Holt Rhinehart and Winston
282. Pfister, H., & Oehl, M. (2009). The impact of goal focus, task type and group size on synchronous net-based collaborative learning discourses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 161-176
283. Pilkington, R. M., & Walker, S. A. (2003). Facilitating debate in networked learning: Reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education. Instructional Science, 31, 41-63
284. Poole, D. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal ofResearch on Computing in Education, 33, 162-177
285. Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mavrikis, M., & Pain, H. (2008). Student affect from tutor perspective. In S. Carberry & F. de Rosis (Eds.), The international journal of personalization research (Special Issue on “Affective modeling and adaptation” user modeling and user-adapted interaction)
286. Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1969). Teaching as a subversive activity. Penguin Education
287. Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 21-24
288. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understandinglearningand teaching. Buckingham, UK: SRHE Open University Press
289. Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: Divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47, 332-351
290. Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1-12
291. QAA (2007). Subject benchmark for history. Gloucester, UK: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
292. Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235-344
293. Ramasundaram, V., Grunwald, S., Mangeot, A., Comerford, B. N., & Bliss, M. C. (2005). Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory. Computers & Education, 45(1), 21-34
294. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge
295. Ravenscroft, A. (2007). Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 453-465
296. Reeve, H., & Gallacher, J. (2005). Employer-university ‘partnerships’: Akey problem for work-based learning programmes? Journal of Education and Work, 18(2), 219-233
297. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999a). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
298. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999b). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II. (pp. 6-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
299. Reigeluth, C. M. (2003). Knowledge building for use of the internet in education. Instructional Science, 31, 341-346
300. Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal ofEducation, 39(1), 29-48
301. Robertson, S. N. M., Dale, R., Tikly, L., Dachi, H., & Alphonce, N. (2007). Globalisation, education and development: Ideas actors and dynamics: Department for International Development
302. Romiszowski, A. (1999). The development of physical skills. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp. 457-481). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
303. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning. (Vol. 128, pp. 69 -97). Berlin: Springer
304. Roussou, M. (2004). Learning by doing and learning through play: An exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 2(1), 10-10
305. Rummel, N. & Spada, H. (2007). Can people learn computer-mediated collaboration by following a script? Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1): 39-55
306. Säljö, R. (2004). Learning and technologies, people and tools in co-ordinated activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 489-494
307. Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page
308. Salmon, G. (2003). E-Moderating: The key to teaching and learning online, 2nd Edition. London: Taylor and Francis
309. San Diego, J. P., Cox, M. J., Quinn, B., Newton, T., Banerjee, A., & Woolford, M. (in press). Research haptics in Higher Education: The complexity of developing haptics virtual learning systems and evaluating their impact on students. Computers and Education
310. San Diego, J. P., Laurillard, D., Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Ljubojevic, D., Neumann, T., Pearce, D. (2008). Towards a user-oriented analytical approach to learning design. ALT-J, 16(1), 15-29
311. Scanlon, E., Blake, C., Joiner, R., & O’Shea, T. (2005). Technologically mediated complex problem-solving on a statistics task. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 165-183
312. Scanlon, E., Littleton, K., Gaved, M., Kerawalla, L., Mulholland, P., Collins, T., Conole, G., Jones, A., Clough, G., Blake, C., & Twiner, A. (2009). Support for evidence-based inquiry learning: Teachers, tools and phases of inquiry. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Amsterdam
313. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO
314. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
315. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A newparadigm ofinstruc- tional theory, Vol. II. (pp. 161-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
316. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46, 349-370
317. Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2009). Tagging thinking types in asynchronous discussion groups: Effects on critical thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 77-94
318. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflectivepractitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
319. Schwartz, D. (1999). The productive agency that drives collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 197-218). New York: Elsevier Science/Permagon
320. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475-522
321. Schwartz, D., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(2), 39-59
322. Senge, P. (2006). Thefifth discipline: The art and practice ofthe learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday
323. Seo, K. K. (2007). Utilizing peer moderating in online discussions: Addressing the controversy between teacher moderation and nonmoderation. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 21-36
324. Sfard, A. (1988). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13
325. Sharp, H., Manns, M. L., & Eckstein, J. (2003). Evolving pedagogical patterns: The work of the pedagogical patterns project. Computer Science Education, 13(4), 315-330
326. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The sage handbook ofe-learning research. (pp. 221-247). London: Sage Publications Ltd
327. Shuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review ofEducational Research, 56(4), 411-436
328. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59
329. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences ofthe artificial, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press
330. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 71-82
331. Slavin, R. E. (2004). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement. In H. Daniels & A. Edwards (Eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in psychology of education (pp. 268-293). London: RoutledgeFalmer
332. Slotta, J. D. (2004). Web-based inquiry science environment (WISE): Scaffolding teachers to adopt inquiry and technology. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell Internet environments for science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
333. Solomon, N., & McIntyre, J. (2000). Deschooling vocational knowledge: Work-based learning and the politics of the curriculum. In C. Symes & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Working knowledge: The new vocationalism and higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE
334. Spellings, M. (2006). A test ofleadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center, U.S. Department of Education
335. Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19-29
336. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook ofthe learning sciences (pp. 409-426.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
337. Steeples, C., Goodyear, P., and Mellar, H. (1994). Flexible learning in higher education: The use of computer-mediated communications. Computers & Education 22, 83-90
338. Stein, J. S., Isaacs, G., & Andrews, T. (2004). Incorporating authentic learning experiences within a university course. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 239-258
339. Steinkuehler, A. C. (2006). Why game (culture) studies now? Games and Culture, 1(1), 97-102
340. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42, 403-424
341. Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint’s power in the classroom: Enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers & Education, 45, 203-215
342. Sutherland, P., Badger, R., & Goodith, W. (2002). How new students take notes at lectures. Journal ofFurther and Higher Education, 26(4), 377-388
343. Swann, J. (2007). Designing‘educationally effective’ discussion. LanguageandEducation, 21(4), 342-358
344. Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 48(1), 5-26
345. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology Review, 25(6), 631-645
346. Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 155-168
347. UKCES. (2009). Ambition 2020: World class skills and jobs for the UK
348. Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynsk, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(20), 153-184
349. UNESCO (2005). Towards knowledge societies. UNESCO World Report. Paris
350. Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., Bell, T., Mansfield, A., & Holmes, J. (2010). Role of the teacher in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 221-243
351. USDoE. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Washington D.C: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology
352. Valaitis, R., Sword, W. A., Jones, B., & Hodges, A. (2005). Problem-based learning online: Perceptions of health science students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10(3), 231-252
353. Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Review 41(2), 1-16
354. van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 671-688
355. van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., de Croock, M., & Paas, F. (2002). Redirecting learners’ attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11-37
356. VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal ofArtifi- cial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227-265
357. Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijks, H. G. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 263-3284
358. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thoughtand language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press
359. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development ofhigherpsychologicalprocesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
360. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space oflearning. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
361. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30
362. Weinberger, A., Ingo Kollar, I., Dimitriadis, Y., Makitalo-Siegl, K., & Fischer, F. (2009). Computer supported collaboration scripts. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & L. Montandon (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning. Principles and products. Springer
363. Weiss, G. & Dillenbourg P. (1999). What is ‘multi’ in multi-agent learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. New York: Elsevier Science
364. Weller, M., Pegler, C., & Mason, R. (2004). Use of innovative technologies on an e-learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 61-71
365. Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. London: Harper and Row
366. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987-995
367. Wiliam, D. (2010). The role of formative assessment in effective learning environments. In H. Dumont, D. Istance & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 135-159). OECD Publishing
368. Wilke, R. R., & Straits, W. J. (2001). Taking the mystery out ofinquiry: Strategiesfor college educators. Paper presented at the Lilly Conference, San Marcos, TX
369. Wilson, T., & Whitelock, D. (1998). Monitoring the on-line behaviour of distance learning students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 14, 91-99
370. Winer, L., & Cooperstock, J. (2002). The “intelligent classroom”: Changing teaching and learning with an evolving technological environment. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 253-266
371. Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397-410
372. Wise, J. C., Lee, S. H., Litzinger, T., Marra, R., & Palmer, B. (2004). A report on a four- year longitudinal study of intellectual development of engineering undergraduates. Journal of Adult Development, 11(2), 103-110
373. Wolpert, L. (2003). Causal belief and the origins of technology Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 361(1809), 1709-1719
374. Wu, D., & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal ofasynchronous learning networks, 8(2), 139-152
375. Young, M. F. D. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge
376. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice 41, 64-70
377. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2007). A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 211-235