Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed?

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-12

  Puntambekar, Sadhana ^a   Hübscher, Roland ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15944396939     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Limitations of Student control: Do students know when they need help? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 292-303). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
2. Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (1996, April 8-14). Designing an activity in the Knowledge Integration Environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New York.
3. Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2000). Designing Mildred: Scaffolding students' reflection and argumentation using a cognitive software guide. In S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 142-149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakaguwa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Saloman (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
6. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In J. G. Borkowski (Ed.), Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practice (pp. 81-132). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1975). From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3, 255-287.
8. Bruner, J. S. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21-34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cazden, C. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at home and at school. Stanford Papers and Reports in Child Language Development, 17, 1-19.
10. Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91-142.
11. Design-based research collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 4-8.
12. Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 355-385.
13. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391-450.
14. Fretz, E. B., Wu, H.-K., Zhang, B., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2002a, April 1-5). A further investigation of scaffolding design and use in a dynamic modeling tool Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans.
15. Fretz, E. B., Wu, H.-K., Zhang, B., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2002b). An investigation of software scaffolds supporting modeling practices. Research in Science Education, 32, 567-589.
16. Greenfield, P. M. (1999). Historical change and cognitive change: A two-decade follow-up study in Zinacantan, a Maya community in Chiapas, Mexico. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 92-98.
17. Guzdial, M., Hübscher, R., Nagel, K., Newstetter, W., Puntambekar, S., Shabo, A., et al. (1997). Integrating and guiding collaboration: Lessons learned in computer-supported collaborative learning research at Georgia Tech. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 91-100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS: A software tool for promoting self-regulated learning in networked collaborative learning environments [Special issue]. Evaluation Research in Education, 7, 313-334.
19. Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Teaching science through online, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the Knowledge Integration Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 839-857.
20. Hogan, D. M., & Tudge, J. (1999). Implications of Vygotsky's theory for peer learning. In A. M. O' Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 39-65). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Scaffolding the development of an inquiry-based (science) classroom. In S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 221-227): Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Hsi, S., & Hoadley, C. M. (1997). Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), 23-36.
23. Jackson, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 187-194). Los Angeles, CA: ACM.
24. Jackson, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Model-It: A design retrospective. In M. Jacobson & R. Kozma (Eds.), Advanced designs for the technologies of learning: Innovations in science and mathematics education (pp.77-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52, 57-66.
26. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (2003). Putting a student-centered Learning by Design™ curriculum into practice: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 485-547.
27. Lagemann, E. C. (2002). Useable knowledge in education: A memorandum for the Spencer Foundation Board of Directors (Memorandum). Chicago, IL: Spencer Foundation. Retrieved January 22, 2003, from http://www.spencer.org/ publications/useable_knowledge_report_ecl_a.htm
28. Land, S. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2001, April 10-14). Scaffolding reflection and revision of explanations during project-based learning: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.
29. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 13, pp. 171-194). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
30. Lepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., & O'Donnell-Johnson, T. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional issues and approaches (pp. 108-144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
31. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 103-126.
32. Linn, M. C. (1998, April 13-17). Using assessment to improve learning outcomes: Experiences from the Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE) and the Computer as Learning Partner (CLP). Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA.
33. Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., & Eylon, B. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction: Alternative views. In D. Berliner (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 438-490). Riverside, NJ: Macmillan.
34. Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Russell, E., Gomez, L. M., Reiser, B. J., & Edelson, D. C. (1998). The Progress Portfolio: Designing reflective tools for a class-room context. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 627-634). Los Angeles, CA: ACM.
35. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
36. Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh - A response to C. Addison Stone's "The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 370-373.
37. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
38. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science by design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42.
39. Puntambekar, S., Nagel, K., Hübscher, R., Guzdial, M., & Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Intragroup and intergroup: An exploration of learning with complementary collaboration tools. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 207-215). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Golan, R., Kyza, E. A., et al. (2002). Evolving a scaffolding design framework for designing educational software. In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 359-366). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Reid, D. K. (1998). Scaffolding: A broader view. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 386-396.
42. Reiser, B. J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In T. D. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Carrying forward the conversation: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 255-264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
43. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Roehler, L. R., & Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 6-42). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
45. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in sociocultural activity. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Rogoff, B. (1999). Thinking and learning in a social context. In J. Lave (Ed.), Everyday cognition: Development in social context (pp. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5-52.
48. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
49. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X. D., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. 2, pp. 183-213). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. (Eds.). (1989). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-Centered Design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st Century. Interactions, 1(2), 36-48.
52. Stone, C. A. (1998a). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364.
53. Stone, C. A. (1998b). Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 409-413.
54. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. (1997). Complementary roles of software-based scaf-folding and teacher-student interactions in inquiry learning. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 289-298). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
55. Tudge, J. (1990, April 16-20). Collaborative problem solving in the zone of proximal development. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Boston, MA.
56. Tudge, J. (2000). Theory, method, and analysis in research on the relations between peer collaboration and cognitive development. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 98-112.
57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. White, B., & Fredriksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.
60. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89-100.