Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course

Instructional Science

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 115-152

  Hara, Noriko ^a   Bonk, Curtis Jay ^a   Angeli, Charoula ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive skills; Computer conferencing; Content analysis; Educational psychology; Metacognition; Online learning; Social interaction; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042727425     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1003764722829     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ahern, T.C., Peck, K. & Laycock, M. (1992). The effects of teacher discourse in computer-mediated discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research 8(3): 291-309.
2. Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L. & Hare, V.C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research 61(3): 315-343.
3. Barnes, S. & Greller, L.M. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in the organization. Communication Education 43(4): 129-142.
4. Berliner, D.C. (1987). But do they understand? in V. Richardson-Koehler, ed., Educator's Handbook: A Research Perspective, pp. 259-293. New York: Longman.
5. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook of Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.
6. Bonk, C.J. (1998, April). Pedagogical activities on the "Smartweb": electronically mentoring undergraduate educational psychology students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual convention, San Diego, CA.
7. Bonk, C.J., Daytner, K., Daytner, G., Dennen, V. & Malikowski, S. (1999). Online Mentoring of Preservice Teachers with Web-based Cases, Conversations, and Collaborations. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual convention, Montreal, Canada.
8. Bonk, C.J., Hansen, E.J., Grabner, M.M., Lazar, S. & Mirabelli, C. (1998). Time to "Connect": Synchronous and asynchronous case-based dialogue among preservice teachers. In C.J. Bonk & K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, pp. 289-314. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Bonk, C.J. & King, K.S. eds (1998). Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bonk, C.J., Malikowski, S., Angeli, C. & East, J. (1998). Web-based case conferencing for preservice teacher education: Electronic discourse from the field. Journal of Educational Computing Research 19(3): 267-304.
11. Bonk, C.J., Malikowski, S., Supplee, L. & Angeli, C. (1998). Holy COW: Scaffolding case-based "Conferencing on the Web" with preservice teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual convention, San Diego, CA.
12. Bonk, C.J. & Sugar, W.A. (1998). Student role play in the World Forum: Analyses of an Arctic learning apprenticeship. Interactive Learning Environments 6(1-2): 1-29.
13. Duffy, T.M., Dueber, B. & Hawley, C.L. (1998). Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In C.J. Bonk & K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, pp. 51-78. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Entwistle, N. & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 58: 258-265.
15. Feenberg, A. (1987). Computer conferencing and the humanities. Instructional Sciences 16: 169-186.
16. Grabowski, B., Suciati & Pusch, W. (1990). Social and intellectual value of computer-mediated communications in a graduate community. Educational and Training Technology International 27(3): 276-283.
17. Harasim, L.M. (1987). Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 16(2): 117-135.
18. Harasim, L.M. (1993). Global Networks: Computers and International Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.R. Kaye, ed., Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers, pp. 115-136. New York: Springer.
20. Hiltz, S.R. (1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. In L.M. Harasim, ed., Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment, pp. 133-183. New York: Praeger.
21. Howell-Richardson, C. & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer-mediated communication courses. Instructional Science 24: 47-69.
22. Iseke-Barnes, J.M. (1996). Issues of educational uses of the Internet: Power and criticism in communications and searching. Journal of Educational Computing Research 15(1): 1-23.
23. Kang, I. (1998). The use of computer-mediated communication: Electronic collaboration and interactivity. In C.J. Bonk & K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, pp. 315-337. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal 29(2): 303-323.
25. Kuehn, S.A. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education 43: 171-183.
26. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lehrer, R. (1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry, eds, Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp. 197-227. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Levin, J.A., Kim, H. & Riel, M.M. (1990). Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In L.M. Harasim, ed., Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment, pp. 185-214. New York, NY: Praeger.
29. Mason, R.I. (1990). Home Computing Evaluation: Use of CoSy on DT200, 1989. (CITE Report No. 99). England: The Open University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 541.)
30. Mowrer, D.E. (1996). A content analysis of student/instructor communication via computer conferencing. Higher Education 32: 217-241.
31. Newman, F.W. (1992). The prospects for classroom thoughtfulness in high school social studies. In C. Collins & J.N. Mangieri, eds, Teaching Thinking: An Agenda for the 21st Century, pp. 105-132. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist 21(1-2): 73-98.
33. Palincsar, A.S. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1(2): 117-175.
34. Phillips, A.F. & Pease, P.S. (1987). Computer conferencing and education: Complementary or contradictory concepts? The American Journal of Distance Education 1(2): 44-52.
35. Phillips, G.M., Santoro, G.M. & Kuehn, S.A. (1988). The use of computer mediated communication in training students in group problem-solving and decision making techniques. The American Journal of Distance Education 2(1): 38-51.
36. Rice, R.E. (1989). Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication systems. In J. Anderson, ed., Communication Yearbook, 12, pp. 436-476. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Rice, R. & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research 14: 85-108.
38. Riel, M. (1990). Cooperative learning across classrooms in electronic learning circles. Instructional Science 19: 445-466.
39. Riel, M. & Harasim, L. (1994). Research perspectives on network learning. Machine-Mediated Learning 4(2-3): 91-113.
40. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford.
41. Romiszowski, A. & Mason, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. In D. Jonassen, ed., Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 438-456. New York: Macmillan.
42. Salomon, G. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry, eds, Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp. 179-196. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
44. Schrage, M. (1990). Shared Minds: The Technologies of Collaboration. New York: Random House.
45. Schwandt, T.A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Shapard, J. (1990). Observations on cross-cultural electronic networking: Access to Japan. Whole Earth Review 69: 32-36.
47. Smolensky, M.W., Carmody, M.A. & Halcomb, C.G. (1990). The influence of task type, group structure, and extroversion on uninhabited speech in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 6: 261-272.
48. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, eds, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyper-personal interaction. Communication Research 23(1): 3-43.
50. Walther, J.B. & Tidwell, L.C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing 5(4): 355-378.
51. Yagelski, R.P. & Grabill, J.T. (1998). Computer-mediated communication in the undergraduate writing classroom: A study of the relationship of online discourse and classroom discourse in two writing classes. Computers and Composition 15: 11-40.
52. Zhu, P. (1998). Learning and mentoring: Electronic discussion in a distance learning course. In C.J. Bonk & K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, pp. 233-259. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.