A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 235-244

  Quintana, Chris ^a   Zhang, Meilan ^a   Krajcik, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144476646     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Abbas, J., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2002). Middle School Children's Use of the ARTEMIS Digital Library. Paper presented at the 2002 ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Portland, OR.
2. American Association of School Librarians. (1998). Information literacy standards for student learning. Chicago: American Library Association.
3. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Airasian, P. W. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessment. New York: Longman.
4. Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The Knowledge Integration Environment: Theory and design. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference '95. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Black, R. S., Sileo, T. W., & Prater, M. A. (2000). Learning journals, self-reflection and university students' changing perceptions. Action in Teacher Education, 27(4), 71-89.
6. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
7. Bos, N. (2000). High school student' critical evaluation of scientific resources on the World Wide Web. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 161-173.
8. Brem, S. K., Russell, J., & Weems, L. (2001). Science of the Web: Student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191-213.
9. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprentice-ship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.
11. Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91-142.
12. Dreher, M. J. (1995). Sixth-grade researchers: Posing questions, finding information, and writing a report. Reading research report. Athens, GA: National Reading Center. (No. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED384104)
13. Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1990). Information problem-solving: The Big Six Skills approach to library & information skills instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Farstrup, A. E., & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.). (2002). What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15. Flavell, J. H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Huffman, J. L. (1999). Information-seeking strategies and science content understandings of sixth grade students using on-line learning environments. Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
18. Huffman, J. L., Wu, H., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of learners' science content understandings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3).
19. Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Problem solving. In E. E. Smith & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
20. Jukes, I. (2000). NetSaavy: Building information literacy in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
21. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Atlanta, GA.
22. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, K. M., Fredericks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Middle School Students' Initial Attempts at Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313-350.
23. Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 23-40.
24. Lin, X., Hmelo, C. E., & Kinzer, C. K. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62.
25. Linn, M. C., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). WISE Science. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 29-32.
26. Lumpe, A. T., & Butler, K. (2002). The information seeking strategies of high school science students. Research in Science Education, 32, 549-566.
27. McCormick, C. B. (2003). Metacognition and learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology volume 7: Educational Psychology (pp. 79-102). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
28. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
29. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Quintana, C. (2001). Symphony: A case study for exploring and describing design methods and guidelines for learner-centered design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
31. Quintana, C., Eng, J., Carra, A., Wu, H., & Soloway, E. (1999). Symphony: A case study in extending learner-centered design through process-space analysis. Paper presented at the Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI '99 Conference Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA.
32. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337-386.
33. Quintana, C., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (2003). Issues and approaches for developing learner-centered technology. In M. Zelkowitz (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol. 57, pp. 272-321). San Diego, CA: Academic.
34. Quintana, C., Wells, C., & Soloway, E. (2002). Symphony2: An extensible software infrastructure for developing scaffolded work environments. Paper presented at the ICLS 2002: International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Seattle, WA.
35. Quintana, C., & Zhang, M. (2004). The Digital IdeaKeeper: Extending digital library services to scaffold online inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
36. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and Conceptual Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry in Biology Classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Students' understanding of causal explanation and natural selection in a technology-supported inquiry curriculum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5-51.
38. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
39. Schwartz, D., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(2), 39-59.
40. Toth, E. E., Suthers, D., & Lesgold, A. (2002). "Mapping to know": The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86, 264-286.
41. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 75-104.
43. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.
44. Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397-410.
45. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1975). The Role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
46. Woodward, H. (1998). Reflective journals and portfolios: Learning through assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 415-426.
47. Zia, L. L. (2000, October). The NSF National Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Digital Library (NSDL) Program: A Progress Report. D-Lib Magazine, 6.
48. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64-70.