Collaboration scripts - A conceptual analysis

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-185

  Kollar, Ingo ^a   Fischer, Frank ^a   Hesse, Friedrich W ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaboration scripts; Computer supported collaborative learning; Scaffolding; Scripts

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748818666     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Anderson, J.R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (Fifth edition). Worth Publishing: New York.
2. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193.
3. Bell, P. (2004). Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. In: Linn, M.C., Davis, E.A., & Bell, P. (eds.), Internet environments for science education. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, pp. 114-144.
4. Brehm, J.W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press: New York.
5. Carmien, S., Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Fischer, G. (in press). The interplay of internal and external scripts. A distributed cognition perspective. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J.M. (eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. Springer: New York.
6. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom : Conditions for productive small groups. Review Educational Research, 64(1), 1-15.
7. Cohen, E.G., & Lotan, R.A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120.
8. Derry, S.J., DuRussel, L.A., & O'Donnell, A.M. (1998). Individual and distributed cognitions in interdisciplinary teamwork: A developing case study and emerging theory. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 25-56.
9. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner, P.A. (ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL. Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen, pp. 61-91.
10. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (in press). Designing integrative scripts. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J.M. (eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. Springer: New York.
11. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
12. Dochy, F., Moerkerke, G., & Segers, M. (1999). The effect of prior knowledge on learning in educational practice: Studies using prior knowledge state assessment. Evaluation & Research in Education, 8, 345-367.
13. Dönmez, P., Rosé, C.P., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005). Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. In: Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., & Chan, T.-W. (eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 Years. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 125-134.
14. Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (in press). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education.
15. Ertl, B., Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2005). Effects of an individual's prior knowledge on collaborative knowledge construction and individual learning outcomes in videoconferencing. In: Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., & Chan, T.-W. (eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 Years. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 145-154.
16. Fabos, B., & Young, M. (1999). Telecommunication in the Classroom: Rhetoric versus Reality. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 217-260.
17. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualisation tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
18. Graesser, A.C., & Person, N.K. (1994). Question asking through tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
19. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437-469.
20. Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75-96.
21. Hron, A., Hesse, F.W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen [Structured collaboration in computer-supported collaborative learning], Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25, 56-69.
22. Hythecker, V.I., Dansereau, D.F., & Rocklin, T.R. (1988). An analysis of the processes influencing the structured dyadic learning environment. Educational Psychologist, 23(1), 23-37.
23. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Constructive conflict in schools. Journal of Social Issues, 50(1), 117-137.
24. King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK - TEL WHY ®©: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 221-235.
25. King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 57-74.
26. King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 33-39.
27. Kollar, I. (2001). Gewissheits- und Ungewissheitsorientierung beim kooperativen Lernen in Videokonferenzen - der Einfluss verschiedener Strukturierungsmaßnahmen. [Uncertainty orientation in video-mediated cooperative learning - effects of different structural supports]. Unpublished master thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
28. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J.D. (2005). Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools. In: Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., & Chan, T.-W. (eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 Years. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 331-340.
29. Lambiotte, J.G., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A.M., Young, M.D., Skaggs, L.P., Hall, R.P., & Rocklin, T.R. (1987). Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 424-430.
30. Larson, C.O., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A., Hythecker, V., Lambiotte, J.G., & Rocklin, T.R. (1984). Verbal ability and cooperative learning: Transfer of effects. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16(4), 289-295.
31. Larson, C.O., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A., Hythecker, V., Lambiotte, J.G., & Rocklin, T.R. (1985). Effects of metacognitive and elaborative activity on cooperative learning and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 342-348.
32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
33. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.
34. Miao, Y., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, H.U., & Harrer, A. (2005). CSCL Scripts: Modelling features and potential use. In: Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., & Chan, T.-W. (eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 Years. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 423-432.
35. Moore, J. L., & Rocklin, T. R. (1998). The distribution of distributed cognition: Multiple interpretations and uses. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 97-113.
36. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
37. Nuthall, G. (2000). The role of memory in the acquisition and retention of knowledge in science and social studies units. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 83-139.
38. O'Connaill, B., & Whittaker, S. (1997). Characterizing, predicting, and measuring video-mediated communication: A conversational approach. In: Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., & Wilbur, S.B. (eds.), Video-mediated communication. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 107-132.
39. O'Donnell, A.M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In: O'Donnell, A.M., & King, A. (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 179-196.
40. O'Donnell, A.M., & Dansereau, D.F. (1992). Scripted Cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In: Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Miller, N. (eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. Cambridge University Press: New York, pp. 120-141.
41. O'Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F., Hall, R.H., & Rocklin, T.R. (1987). Cognitive, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 431-437.
42. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
43. Pea, R.D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and design for education. In: Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 47-87.
44. Pea, R.D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
45. Perkins, D.N. (1993). Person-plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning. In: Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 88-110.
46. Pfister, H.-R., & Mühlpfordt, M. (2002). Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: The learning protocol approach. In: Stahl, G. (ed.), Proceedings of the conference on computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) 2002. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 581-589.
47. Plass, J.L., Chun, D., Mayer, R.E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visualizer and verbalizer learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 25-36.
48. Quintana, C., Reiser, B.J., Davis, E.A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R.G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337-387.
49. Reiser, B.J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273-304.
50. Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31, 115-121.
51. Rewey, K.L., Dansereau, D.F., Dees, S.M., Skaggs, L.P., & Pitre, U. (1992). Scripted cooperation and knowledge map supplements: Effects of the recall of biological and statistical information. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(2), 93-107.
52. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.
53. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241.
54. Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals' cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In: Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press: New York City, pp. 111-138.
55. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
56. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993/1994). Computer-support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
57. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R.S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
58. Schank, R.C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
59. Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
60. Schellens, T., van Keer, H., Valcke, M., & deWever, B. (2005). The impact of role assignment as scripting tool on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups. In: Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., & Chan, T.-W. (eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 Years. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 557-566.
61. Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 101-120.
62. Schwan, S. (1997). Media characteristics and knowledge acquisition in computer conferencing. European Psychologist, 2(3), 277-285.
63. Sherin, B., Reiser, B.J., & Edelson, C. (2004). Scaffolding analysis: Extending the scaffolding metaphor to learning artifacts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 387-421.
64. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24-33.
65. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C.D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219.
66. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10(3), 251-296.
67. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-335.
68. Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 261-312.
69. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
70. Vygotsky, L.S. (1992). Thought and language (rev. ed.). The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
71. Webb, N.M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
72. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
73. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89-100.