The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration

Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3-19

  Dillenbourg, Pierre ^a   Järvelä, Sanna ^b   Fischer, Frank ^c  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaboration scripts; Collaborative learning; Learning technologies; Motivation; Self regulation; Shared knowledge; Technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892210019     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11-13.
2. Anderson, A. H., Smallwood, L., MacDonald, R., Mullin, J., Fleming, A., & O'Malley, C. (2000). Video data and video links in mediated communication: What do users value ? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 165-187.
3. Amseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 167-185.
4. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.
5. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instmctional Science, 33, 367-379.
6. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193.
7. Bauer, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). The educational research-practice interface revisited: A scripting perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 221-236.
8. Bielaczyk, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269-291). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Blumenfeld, P., Kempler, T., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37-40.
11. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Re\'iew, 54, 199-231.
12. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Burdett, J. (2003). Making groups work: University students' perceptions. International Education Journal, 4, 177-191.
14. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner, & D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning (pp. 161-178). London: Free Association Books.
16. Dickson, W. R, & Vereen, M. A. (1983). Two students at one microcomputer. Theory into Practice, 22, 296-300.
17. Dillenbourg, R (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In R A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
18. Dillenbourg, R (2005). Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 243-264). New York: Springer.
19. Dillenbourg, R, & Fischer, F. (2007). Basics of computer-supported collaborative learning. Zeitschrift ftir Bemfs- und Wirtschaftspadagogik, 21, 111-130.
20. Dillenbourg, R, & Jermann, R (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, Haake & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer supported communication of knowledge: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York: Springer.
21. Dillenbourg, R, & Tchounikine, R (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 1-13.
22. Dillenbourg, R, Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & R Reimann (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.
23. Donmez, R, Rose, C. R., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005, May). Supporting CSCL with automatic coipus analysis technology. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2005: The Next 10 Years, Taipei, Taiwan.
24. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., & Feltovich, J. (1996). Collaboration within and among minds: Mastering complexity, individually and in groups. In T. Koschman (Ed.), Computer systems for collaborative learning (pp. 25-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Fischer, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2006, April). Challenges of orchestrating computer-supported collaborative learning. Paper presented at the 87th. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, USA.
26. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning - the role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 405-441.
27. Fischer, F., Wecker, C., Schrader, J., Geijets, P. H., & Hesse, F. W. (2005, August). Use-inspired basic research on the orchestration of cognition, instruction and technology in the classroom. Paper presented at the SIG Invited Symposium "Instructional design and empirical research: Experiments and/or design experiments" at the 11th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Nicosia, Cyprus.
28. Fussell, S. R., Kraut, R. E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. In W. Kellogg & S. Whittaker (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (pp. 21-30). New York: ACM Press
29. Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2004). Undergraduate students' experiences of networked learning in UK higher education: A surveybased study. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning (pp. 91-121). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
30. Greenberg, S., & Fitchett, C. (2001). Phidgets: Easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets. In J. Marks & E. Mynatt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User inteiface Software and Technology (pp. 209-218). New York: ACM Press.
31. Haake, J. (2006, May). Editable chat logs: A concept for seamless integration of chat conversations and documents in shared workspaces. Paper presented at COOP 2006:7th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Carry-le-Rouet, France.
32. Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2005). Roles for software technologies in advancing research and theory in educational psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 1-24.
33. Hadwin, A., Oshige, M., Gress, G. Z., & Winne, P. (in press). Innovative ways for using gStudy to orchestrate and research social aspects of self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007. 06.007.
34. Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Jarvela, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computersupported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, N. Miyake & R. Hall (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 129-156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Hammond, M. (1999). Issues associated with participation in on line forums - the case of the communicative learner. Education and Infonnation Technologies, 4, 353-367.
36. Hickey, D. T., Moore, A. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2001). The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 38, 611-652.
37. Hoadley, C. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 203-212.
38. Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennett & G. Lynch, (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI'92) (pp. 119-125). New York: ACM Press.
39. Hurme, T-R., Merenluoto, K., Salonen, P., & Jarvela, S. (2007). Metacognition as shared process in networked mathematical problem solving. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B., 1997. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 234-241). New York: ACM Press.
41. Jarvela, S., & Hakkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning: The quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10, 1-22.
42. Jarvenoja, H., & Jarvela, S. (2005). How students describe the sources of their emotional and motivational experiences during the learning process: A qualitative approach. Learning and Instruction, 15, 465-480.
43. Jarvela, S., & Niemivirta, M. (2001). Motivation in context: Challenges and possibilities in studying the role of motivation in new pedagogical cultures. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in leaning contexts (pp. 105-127). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
44. Jarvela, S., & Volet, S. (2004). Motivation in real-life, dynamic and interactive learning environments: Stretching constructs and methodologies. European Psychologist, 9, 193-197.
45. Jarvela, S., Jarvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2007). Understanding dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46. Jarvela, S., Volet, S., & Jarvenoja, H. (2007). Motivation in collaborative learning: New concepts and methods for studying social processes of motivation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47. Jeong, H., & Chi, M. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35, 287-316.
48. Jermann, P., Soller, A., & Muhlenbrock, M. (2001). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of EuroCSCL (pp. 324-331). Maastricht, The Netherlands: McLuhan Institute.
49. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th edn.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50. Jones, A., & Isroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computersupported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44, 395-408.
51. Kaplan, F., Do Lenh, S., Bachour, K, Kao, G., Gault, C., & Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Interpersonal computers for higher education. In P. Dillenbourg, J. Huang & M. Cherubini (Eds.), Collaborative artefacts and interactive furniture (pp. 129-145). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
52. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
53. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159-185.
54. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 708-722.
55. Kuutti, K, & Kaptelinin, V. (1997). Rethinking cognitive tools: From augmentation to mediation. In P. Marsh, C. Nehaniv & B. Gorayska (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology (pp. 31-32). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
56. Makitalo, K, Hakkinen, P., Jarvela, S., & Leinonen, P. (2002). The mechanisms of common ground in the web-based interaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 247-265.
57. Manlove, S., Lazonder, A., & De Jong, T. (2005, April). Supporting collaborative self-regulation during online scientific inquiry learning. Paper presented at AERA 2005 Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
58. Nova, N., Girardin, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2005). "Location is not enough!": An empirical study of location-awareness in mobile collaboration. In H. Ogata & M. Sharpies (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 21-28). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
59. O'Donnell, A. N., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interactions in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-141). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
60. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for remote real-time work. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 362-368). Denver, CO: Academic Press.
61. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of "scaffolding" and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423-451.
62. Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2002). Be careful what you wish for: You may get it: Educational research in the spotlight. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 15-17.
63. Prante, T., Streitz, N. A., & Tandler, P. (2004). Roomware: Computers disappear and interaction evolves. IEEE Computer, 37, 47-54.
64. Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning, (pp. 69-97). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
66. Rose, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 237-271.
67. Russell, D., Streitz, N. A., & Winograd, T. (2005). Building disappearing computers. Communications of the ACM, 48, 42-28.
68. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-100.
69. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
70. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 957-975.
71. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract dyad representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321-354.
72. Singer, J., Marx, R., Krajick, J., & Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35, 165-178.
73. Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2007). Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research. Learning and Instruction, 17, 389-393.
74. Summers, J. J. (2006). Effects of collaborative learning in math on sixth graders individual goal orientations from a socio-constructivist perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 273-290.
75. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 183-218.
76. Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J., & Paolucci, M. (1995). Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In J. Greer (Ed,), AI-Ed 95, the 7th world conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 266-273) Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
77. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 305-335.
78. Ullmer, B., & Ishii, H. (2000). Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal, 393, 915-931.
79. Volet, S. E., & Karabenick, S. (2006). Help-seeking in cultural context. In S. Karabenick & R. Newman (Eds.), Help seeking in academic settings: Goals, groups and contexts, (pp. 117-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
81. Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2007). Fading scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of distributed monitoring. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of the CSCL 2007 (pp. 763-771). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
82. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
83. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computersupported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1-30.
84. Weiser, M. (1993). Ubiquitous computing. IEEE Computer, 26(10), 71-72.
85. De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2007). Applying multilevel modelling on content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of the impact of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups. Learning and Instruction, 17, 436-447.
86. Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J. C., Kumar, V., Hadwin, A. F., Lajoie, S. P., Azevedo, R. A., & Perry, N. E. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: The Learning Kit Project. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3, 105-113.