Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 211-224

  Kobbe, Lars ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^b   Dillenbourg, Pierre ^c   Harrer, Andreas ^d   Hämäläinen, Raija ^e   Häkkinen, Päivi ^e   Fischer, Frank ^b  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c EPFL   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Activities; Collaboration scripts; Collaborative learning; CSCL scripts; Group formation; Roles; Sequencing; Task distribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748864835     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In: J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. (Vol. 1) (pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593-604.
4. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
5. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
6. Dansereau, D. F., Collins, K. W., McDonald, B. A., Holley, C. D., Garland, J. C., Diekhoff, G., et al. (1979). Development and evaluation of a learning strategy program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 64-73.
7. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: P. A. Kirschner (ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, NL: Open Universiteit Nederland.
8. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In: F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
9. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. (eds.). (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
10. Haake, J. & Pfister, H. R. (2007). Flexible scripting in net-based learning groups. In: F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
11. Hamilton, R. J. (1997). Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 299-318.
12. Harrer, A., & Malzahn, N. (2006). Bridging the gap-towards a graphical modelling language for learning designs and collaboration scripts of various granularities. In: Kinshuk, R. Koper, P. Kommers, P. Kirschner, D. Sampson, & W. Didderen (eds.), Advanced learning technologies ICALT 2006 (pp. 296-300). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
13. Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4).
14. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 664-687.
15. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 338-368.
16. King, A. (2006). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In: F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
17. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. (2006). Computer-supported cooperation scripts-A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.
18. Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development (Karger), 43, 332-360.
19. MOSIL (2004). Framework for integrated learning. Retrieved January 13th, 2006, from http://www.iwm-kmrc.de/cossicle/resources/D23-05-01-F.pdf
20. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In: A. M. O'Donnell, & A. King (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. O'Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In: R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, & N. Miller (eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. (pp. 120-141). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1994). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
23. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
24. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.
25. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321-354.
26. Van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311-330.
27. Webb, N. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39.
28. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D. & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406-423.
29. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In: D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
30. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
31. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modelling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.