Role of the teacher in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 221-243

  Urhahne, Detlef ^a   Schanze, Sascha ^b   Bell, Thorsten ^c   Mansfield, Amie ^d   Holmes, Jeff ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^d Education Development Center   (United States)

^e Discovery Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649156916     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690802516967     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Barton, R. (2005). Supporting teachers in making innovative changes in the use of computer-aided practical work to support concept development in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 345-365.
2. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9-21.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
4. Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Hernández-Leo, D., Dimitriadis, Y. A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Vega-Gorgojo, G., & Vaquero-González, L. M. (2004). Towards reusability and tailorability in collaborative learning systems using IMS-LD and grid services. International Journal on Advanced Technology for Learning, 1(3), 129-138.
5. Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., et al. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 23-41.
6. Christmann, E. P., & Badgett, J. L. (2003). A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on elementary students' academic achievement. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 15, 91-104.
7. Christmann, E. P., Badgett, J. L., & Lucking, R. (1997). Microcomputer-based computer-assisted instruction with differing subject areas: A statistical deduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3), 281-296.
8. Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 47-60). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers' views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-238.
11. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
12. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
13. European Commission. (2006). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006. Final report from head teacher and classroom teacher surveys in 27 European countries. Bonn, Germany: Empirica.
14. Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers' integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101(3), 261-315.
15. Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Advances in assessment models, methods, and practices. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 899-925). New York: Macmillan.
16. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2006). Situated expertise in integrating use of multimedia simulation into secondary school teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 701-732.
17. Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). COLLAGE: A collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 58-71.
18. Hickey, D. T., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., & Christie, M. A. T. (2003). Integrating curriculum, instruction, assessment, and evaluation in a technology-supported genetics learning environment. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 495-538.
19. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F.W. (2006). Collaboration scripts-A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.
20. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483-397.
21. Lakkala, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Teachers' pedagogical designs for technologysupported collective inquiry: A national case study. Computers & Education, 45, 337-356.
22. Linn, M. C., Clark, D. B., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87, 517-538.
23. Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Linn, M. C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313, 1049-1050.
25. Lou, Y. (2004). Understanding process and affective factors in small group versus individual learning with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(4), 337-369.
26. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Appolonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449-521.
27. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
28. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2006). Exploring mathematics through construction and collaboration. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 389-405). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
29. Piaget, J. (1926). The child's conception of the world. Paris: Alcan.
30. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, mathematics and science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 259-275.
31. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2005). Incorporating Internet resources into classroom practice: Pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary-school subject teachers. Computers & Education, 44, 1-34.
32. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
34. Schacter, J., & Fagnano, C. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 329-343.
35. Schwarz, C.V., & White, B.Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205.
36. Senkbeil, M., & Wittwer, J. (2007). Die Computervertrautheit von Jugendlichen und Wirkungen der Computernutzung auf den fachlichen Kompetenzerwerb [Computer familiarity of adolescents and impact of computer use on professional competence acquisition]. In PISAKonsortium
37. Deutschland (Ed.), PISA '06. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie [PISA '06. Results of the third international comparison study] (pp. 277-307). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
38. Shuell, T.J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726-764). New York: Macmillan.
39. Slotta, J.D. (2004). The web-based inquiry science environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In M.C. Linn, E.A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203-231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Slotta, J.D., Jorde, D., & Holmes, J. (under review). Learning from our peers in international exchanges: When is worth doing, and how can we help it succeed?
41. Smeets, E., & Mooij, T. (2001). Pupil-centred learning, ICT, and teacher behaviour: observations in educational practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 403-417.
42. Somekh, B., & Davies, R. (1991). Towards a pedagogy for information technology. The Curriculum Journal, 2(2), 153-170.
43. Susman, E.B. (1998). Cooperative learning: A review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(4), 303-322.
44. van Joolingen, W.R., de Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 111-119.
45. van Joolingen, W.R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A.W., Savelsbergh, E.R., & Manlove, S. (2005). CoLab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 671-688.
46. Vogel, J.J., Vogel, D.S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C.A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229-243.
47. Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacher. Educational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 15-31.
48. Voogt, J., Almekinders, M., van den Aker, J., & Moonen, B. (2005). A 'blended' in-service arrangement for classroom technology integration: Impacts on teachers and students. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 523-539.
49. Voogt, J., & Plomp, T. (2001). Innovative didactics with information and communication technology. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
50. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Webb, M. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: Implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705-735.
52. Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communication technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235-286.
53. Wessner, M., Schwabe, G., & Haake, J.M. (2004). Konzepte für den Lehrenden [Concepts for the teacher]. In J.M. Haake, G. Schwabe, & M. Wessner (Eds.), CSCL-Kompendium. Lehrund Handbuch zum computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen [CSCL-compendium. Text-and handbook of computer-supported cooperative learning] (pp. 184-190). München, Germany: Oldenbourg.
54. White, B.Y., & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
55. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307-320.
56. Williams, M., Linn, M.C., Ammon, P., & Gearhart, M. (2004). Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 189-206.
57. Wood, C. (2001). Users and abusers. Teaching ICT, 1(2), 8-10.