Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning

Instructional Science

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-30

  Weinberger, Armin ^a   Ertl, Bernhard ^b   Fischer, Frank ^a   Mandl, Heinz ^b  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Computer supported collaborative learning; Cooperation scripts; CSCL; Discussion boards; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 14644420235     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Baker, M. & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13: 175-193.
2. Brooks, L.W. & Dansereau, D.F. (1983). Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processing. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 811-820.
3. Brown, A.L. & Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L.B. Resnick, ed., Knowing, Learning, and Instruction. Essays in the Honour of Robert Glaser, pp. 393-451. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Chan, C.K.K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science 29: 443-479.
5. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5: 121-152.
6. Chinn, C.A. & Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research 63: 1-49.
7. Clark, D., Weinberger A., Jucks, I., Spitulnik M. & Wallace, R. (2003). Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer supported collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice 4(1): 55-82.
8. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 64: 1-35.
9. Dansereau, D.F., Collins, K.W., McDonald, B.A., Holley, C.D., Garland, J.C., Diekhoff, G. & Evans, S.H. (1979). Development and evaluation of a learning strategy program. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 64-73.
10. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P.A. Kirschner, ed., Three Worlds of CSCL. Can We Support CSCL, pp. 61-91. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
11. Doise, W. (1990). System and metasystem in cognitive operations. In M. Carretero, M.L. Pope, P.R.J. Simons and J.I. Pozo, eds, Learning and Instruction: European Research in an International Context, pp. 125-139. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
12. Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Thibodeau Hardiman, P. & Mestre, J.P. (1992). Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(3): 307-331.
13. Ertl, B.M. (2003). Kooperatives Lernen in Videokonferenzen: Förderung von individuellem und gemeinsamem Lernerfolg durch external repräsentierte Strukturangebote [Cooperative learning in videoconferences: Facilitation of individual and collaborative learning outcome through externally represented structuring tools]. Doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians- University, Munich, Germany. Available at: http://edoc.ub.unimuenchen.de/ archive/00001227/01/Ertl_Bernhard_M.pdf.
14. Fischer, F. (2001). Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion. Analyse und Förderung in computerunterstützten Kooperationsszenarien [Collaborative knowledge construction. Analysis and facilitation in computer-supported collaborative scenarios]. Professorial dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
15. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C. & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12: 213-232.
16. Geyken, A., Mandl, H. & Reiter, W. (1998). Selbstgesteuertes Lernen mit Tele-Tutoring [Selfguided learning with tele-tutoring]. In R. Schwarzer, ed., Multimedia und TeleLearning [Multimedia and telelearning], pp. 181-196. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
17. Guzley, R.M., Avanzino, S. & Bor, A. (2001). Simulated computer-mediated / video-interactive distance learning: A test of motivation, interaction satisfaction, delivery, learning & perceived effectiveness. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6.
18. Herrenkohl, L.R. & Guerra, M.R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction 16: 433-475.
19. Hesse, F.W., Garsoffky, B. & Hron, A. (1997). Interfacedesign für computerunterstütztes kooperatives Lernen [Interface design for computer-supported cooperative learning]. In L.J. Issing and P. Klimsa, eds, Informationen und Lernen mit Multimedia (Information and learning with multimedia), 2nd ed., pp. 253-267. Weinheim: Beltz.
20. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B.K. & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction 17(4): 379-432.
21. Hron, A., Hesse, F.W., Reinhard, P. & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen [Structured cooperation in computer-supported collaborative learning]. Unterrichtswissenschaft 25(1): 56-69.
22. Hytecker, V.I., Dansereau, D.F. & Rocklin, T.R. (1988). An analysis of the processes influencing the structured dyadic learning environment. Educational Psychologist 23(1): 23-37.
23. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal 31: 338-368.
24. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A.M. O'Donnell & A. King, eds, Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, pp. 87-115. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Kollar, I., Fischer, F. & Hesse, F.W. (2003). Cooperation scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. In B. Wasson, R. Baggetun, U. Hoppe, and S. Ludvigsen, eds, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning - CSCL 2003, COMMUNITY EVENTS - Communication and Interaction, pp. 59-61. Bergen, NO: InterMedia.
26. Larson, C.O., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A.M., Hytecker, V.I., Lambiotte, J.G. & Rocklin, T.R. (1985). Effects of metacognitive and elaborative activity on cooperative learning and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10: 342-348.
27. Mandl, H., Gruber, H. & Renkl, A. (1996). Communities of practice toward expertise: Social foundation of university instruction. In P.B. Baltes and U. Staudinger, eds, Interactive Minds. Life-Span Perspectives on the Social Foundation of Cognition, pp. 394-411. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Nastasi, B.K. & Clements, D.H. (1991). Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practice. School Psychology Review 20: 110-131.
29. Nussbaum, E.M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G.M., Reynolds, R.E. & Bendixen, L.D. (2002). Enhancing the quality of online discussions. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
30. O'Donnell, A.M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A.M. O'Donnell and A. King, eds, Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, pp. 179-196. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. O'Donnell, A.M. & Dansereau, D.F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz Lazarowitz and N. Miller, eds, Interactions in Cooperative Groups. The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning, pp. 120-141. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32. Palincsar, A.S. & Herrenkohl, L.R. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A.M. O'Donnell and A. King, eds, Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, pp. 151-177. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Piaget, J. (1932/1965). Moral Judgment of the Child. New York: Free Press.
34. Reiser, B.J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In G. Stahl, ed., Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002, Boulder, USA, pp. 255-264. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Salomon, G. & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research 13(1): 89-99.
36. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann, ed., CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, pp. 249-268. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Scarr, S. & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development 54: 424-435.
38. Suthers, D.D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J.E.B. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D.D. Suthers, eds, Arguing to Learn. Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, pp. 27-46. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39. Suthers, D.D. & Hundhausen, C.D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings and K. Hakkarainen, eds, European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 577-592. Maastricht, NL: University of Maastricht.
40. Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo and B. Burge, eds, Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, pp. 361-384. Berlin: Springer.
41. Veerman, A.L. & Treasure-Jones, T. (1999). Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentation. In P. Coirier and J.E.B. Andriessen, eds, Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing, pp. 203-230. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
42. Webb, N.M. & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school. In A.M. O'Donnell and A. King, eds, Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, pp. 117-149. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Webb, N.M., Jonathan, D., Fall, T. & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology 87: 406-423.
44. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Available at: http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/00001120/ 01/Weinberger_ Armin.pdf.
45. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F. & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In G. Stahl, ed., Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002, Boulder, USA, pp. 573-574. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F. & Mandl, H. (2003). Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion in computervermittelter Kommunikation: Wirkungen von Kooperationsskripts auf den Erwerb anwendungsorientierten Wissens? [Collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication: Effects of cooperation scripts on acquisition of application-oriented knowledge]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 211(2): 86-97.
47. Weinberger, A. & Mandl, H. (2003). Computer-mediated knowledge communication. Special Issue: New Media in Education. Studies in Communication Sciences: 81-105.
48. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 92: 548-573.
49. Zhang, J. & Norman, D.A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 18: 87-122.