Learning through discussions

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 73-93

  Ellis, Robert A ^a   Calvo, Rafael ^a   Levy, David ^a   Tan, Kelvin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31844434825     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0729436032000168504     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Biggs JB, (1999) Teaching for quality learning at university Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press
2. Chou, CC. (2001). Formative evaluation of synchronous CMC systems for a learner-centred online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12: 173–192.
3. Cope C, (2000) Educationally critical aspects of the experience of learning about the concept of an information system Unpublished thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
4. Crawford, K, Gordon, S, Nicholas, J, and Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: the perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4: 331–345.
5. Dowling C, (1999 December) Talking in class: The roles of software agents and other participants in the social construction of knowledge within online learning environments Responding to Diversity: The 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane99/papers/papers.htm
6. Dutt-Doner, KM, and Powers, SM. (2000). The use of electronic communication to develop alternative avenues for classroom discussion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8: 153–172.
7. Entwistle N, Ramsden P, (1983) Understanding student learning London: Croom Helm
8. Feenberg, A. (1987). Computer conferencing and the humanities. Instructional Science, 16: 169–186.
9. Harasim L, (1989) Online education: A new domain In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.) Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 50–62) New York: Pergamon Press
10. Hazel, E, Prosser, M, and Trigwell, K. (2002). Variation in learning orchestration in university biology courses. International Journal of Science Education, 24: 737–751.
11. Hounsell D, (1987) Essay writing and the quality of feedback In J. Richardson, M. Eysenck, & W. Piper (Eds.) Student learning: research in education & cognitive psychology (pp. 109–119) Milton Keynes, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press
12. Kiesler, S, Siegel, J, and McGuire, TW. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39: 1123–1134.
13. Kremers, M. (1988). Sherman Hill meets ENFI: An inquiry and a retrospective. Computers and Composition, 5: 69–77.
14. Laurillard D, (1993) Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology London: Routledge
15. Laurillard D, (2002) Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge
16. Marton F, Booth S, (1997) Learning and awareness Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
17. Marton, F, and Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 4–11.
18. Marton, F, and Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 115–127.
19. Pask, G. (1976). Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 12–25.
20. Prosser M, (2000) Evaluating the new technologies: A student learning focused perspective (Uniserve Science May Workshop). Unpublished manuscript
21. Prosser, M, and Millar, R. (1989). The ‘how’ and ‘what’ of learning physics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4: 513–528.
22. Prosser M, Trigwell K, (1999) Understanding learning & teaching: The experience in higher education Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press
23. Prosser, M, Hazel, E, and Waterhouse, F. (2000). Students' experiences of studying physics concepts: The effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15: 61–74.
24. Ramsden P, (1992) Learning to teach in higher education London: Routledge
25. Salmon G, (2001) E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online London: Kogan Page
26. Selfe, CL, and Meyer, PR. (1991). Testing claims for online conferences. Written Communication, 8: 163–198.
27. Svensson, L. (2002). Discursive evaluation in a distributed learning community. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18: 308–322.
28. Trigwell, K, and Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers' approach to teaching. Higher Education, 32: 77–87.