TPD as online collaborative learning for innovation in teaching

Online Learning Communities and Teacher Professional Development: Methods for Improved Education Delivery

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 230-246

  Laurillard, Diana ^a,b   Masterman, Elizabeth ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Centre for Neuroscience in Education   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650219879     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-780-5.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Agostinho, S. (2008). Learning Design Representations to Document, Model, and Share Teaching Practice. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies (pp. 1-19). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
2. Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Miller, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469. doi:10.1080/00131910500279551
3. Armstrong, V., & Curran, S. (2006). Developing a collaborative model of research using digital video. Computers & Education, 46(3), 336-347. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.015
4. Beetham, H. (2008). Review: Design for Learning programme phase 2. Unpublished report. Bristol: JISC.
5. Britain, S. (2004). A Review of Learning design: Concept, Specifications and Tools. A report for the JISC E-learning Pedagogy Programme. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/me-dia/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/learningdesigntoolsfinalreport.pdf
6. CEC. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
7. Comber, C., Watling, R., Lawson, T., Cavendish, S., McEune, R., & Paterson, F. (2002). Impact2: Learning at home and school: Case studies. Coventry, UK: Becta.
8. Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., & Kington, A. (2006). Variations in the work and lives of teachers: relative and relational effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 12(2), 169-192.
9. DfES. (2005). Five Year Strategy for Children and Learners. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/publications/5yearstrategy/
10. Dutton, W., Cheong, P. H., & Park, A. (2004). An Ecology of Constraints on e-Learning in Higher Education: The Case of a Virtual Learning Environment. Prometheus, 22(2), 131-149. doi:10.1080/0810902042000218337
11. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247-273. doi:10.1080/158037042000225245
12. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41(4), 397-420. doi:10.1016/j.com-pedu.2003.07.001
13. Hodkinson, P., & James, D. (2003). Transforming Learning Cultures in Further Education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55(4), 389-406. doi:10.1080/13636820300200236
14. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 205-226). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
15. JISC. (2004). Effective Practice with e-Learning. Higher Education Funding Council for England.
16. JISC. (2006). Background to the JISC Circular 1/06: Design for Learning Programme (briefing document). Bristol: JISC. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingoppor-tunities/funding_calls/2006/02/funding_01_06.aspx
17. JISC. (2007). Effective Practice with e-Assessment. Higher Education Funding Council for England.
18. Kennewell, S., & Morgan, A. (2003). Student teachers' experiences and attitudes towards using interactive whiteboards in the teaching and learning of young children. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Sydney, Australia.
19. Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 319-339. doi:10.1080/03075070600680786
20. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., & Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 211-224. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4
21. nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
22. Laurillard, D. (2008). The teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 139-154. doi:10.1080/03075070801915908
23. Laurillard, D., Oliver, M., Wasson, B., & Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing technology enhanced learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products (pp. 285-302). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
24. Lucas, L. (2008). Towards a Socio-cultural understanding of academics' experiences of linking research and teaching. Seminar given at the Oxford Learning Institute, University of Oxford, UK, May 29, 2008.
25. Masterman, E. (2008a). Activity Theory and the Design of Pedagogic Planning tools. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies (pp. 209-227). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
26. Masterman, L. (2008b). Phoebe Pedagogy Planner Project: Evaluation Report. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning Unit and Oxford University Computing Services. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/Phoebeevalu-ationreportsept08.pdf
27. Masterman, L., & Lee, S. (2005). Reusing learning materials in English Literature and Language: Perspectives from three universities. Egham, UK: Higher Education Academy English Subject Centre. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.english.heacademy.ac.uk/explore/projects/archive/technology/tech10.php
28. NCIHE. (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society. Summary Report (Document No. NCIHE/97/849). London: HMSO.
29. Oliver, M. (2002). Creativity and the curriculum design process: a case study. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/id153_Creativity_and_the_curriculum_de-sign_process_a_case_study
30. Oliver, M. (2003). Curriculum Design as acquired social practice: a case study. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
31. Salmon, G., Jones, S., & Armellini, A.(2008). Building institutional capability in e-learning design. ALT-J, 16(2), 95-109. doi:10.1080/09687760802315978
32. San Diego, J., Laurillard, D., Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Ljubojevic, D., Neumann, T., & Pearce, D. (2008). Towards a user-oriented analytical approach to learning design. ALT-J, 16(1), 15-29. doi:10.1080/09687760701850174
33. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1999). Kids As Informants: Telling Us What We Didn't Know or Confirming What We Knew Already? In A. Druin (Ed.), The Design of Children's Technology (pp. 27-50). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
34. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy and Technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., & Francis, R. (2006). Implementing a university e-learning strategy: Levers for change within academic schools. ALT-J, 14(2), 135-151. doi:10.1080/09687760600668503
36. Sharpe, R., & Oliver, M. (2007). Designing courses for e-learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 41-51). London: Routledge.
37. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Triggs, P., & John, P. (2004). From transaction to transformation: information and communication technology, professional development and the formation of communities of practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 426-439. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00101.x
39. Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235-286. doi:10.1080/14759390400200183
40. Weller, M., Pegler, C., & Mason, R. (2005). Use of innovative technologies on an e-learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 61-71. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.10.001
41. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Wolpert, L. (2003). Causal belief and the origins of technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 361(1809), 1709-1719.