Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration

Science Learning and Instruction: Taking Advantage of Technology to Promote Knowledge Integration

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-340

  Linn, Marcia C ^a   Eylon, Bat Sheva ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886481688     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203806524     Document Type: Book

References (616)

1. Abell, S. K., Martini, M., & George, M. D. (2001). “That's what scientists have to do”: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1095-1109.
2. Abelson, H., & Sussman, G. (1985). Structure and interpretation of computer programs. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Abraham, M. R. (1998). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 513-524). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwers.
4. Agogino, A. M., & Linn, M. C. (1992). Retaining female engineering students: Will early design experiences help? [Viewpoint Editorial]. M. Wilson (Ed.). National Science Foundation Directions, 5(2), 8-9.
5. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259-303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2002). Middle grades science textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www. project2061.org/publications/textbook/mgsci/report/index.htm
8. American Association for the Advancement of Science, A. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. American Association of University Women (AAUW) Educational Foundation. (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: AAUW.
10. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
12. Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Simon, B., Wolfman, S. A., VanDeGrift, T., & Yasuhara, K. (2004). Experiences with a tablet PC based lecture presentation system in computer science courses. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. Norfolk, VA: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
13. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education 18(1), 53-85.
14. Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2005). Using static and dynamic visuals to represent chemical change at molecular level. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1269-1298.
15. Aronson, J. (Ed.). (2002). Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Ashburn, E. A., & Floden, R. E. (Eds.). (2006). Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267.
18. Bagno, E., & Eylon, B.-S. (1997). From problem-solving to a knowledge structure: An example from the domain of electromagnetism. The American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 726-736.
19. Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B.-S. (2008). Meeting the challenge of students' understanding of formulas in high-school physics: A learning tool. Physics Education, 43, 75-82. Available also at: Http://stacks.iop.org/0031-9120/43/75
20. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3), 175-193.
21. Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423.
22. Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C., & Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 272-281.
23. Barab, S., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (Eds.). (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24. Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70-102.
25. Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students' chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education, 89(1), 117-139.
26. Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2009). Identifying meta-clusters of students' interest in science and their change with age. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 999-1022.
27. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403-436.
28. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
29. Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the predinical years. New York: Springer.
30. Beck, S., Bertholle, L., & Child, J. (1961). Mastering the art of French cooking. New York: Knopf.
31. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use (Report No. 1). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine, and the University of Minnesota.
32. Beichner, R. (2000). Student-centered activities for large enrollment university physics (SCALE-UP). In Proceedings of the Sigma Xi forum "reshaping undergraduate science and engineering education: Tools for better learning" (pp. 43-52). Minneapolis, MN.
33. Beichner, R. J. (2008). The SCALE-UP project: A student-centered active learning environment for undergraduate programs. Invited white paper for the National Academy of Sciences: The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
34. Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 10-19). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
35. Bell, P. (2004a). Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 115-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Bell, P. (2004b). The educational opportunities of contemporary controversies in science. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 233-260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The knowledge integration environment: Theory and design. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL '95 (pp. 14-21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Bell, P., Hoadley, C., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 73-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., Feder, M. A., & National Research Council (NRC) (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
40. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.
41. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321-346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1986a). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63(1), 64-66.
43. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1986b). Revision of course materials on the basis of research on conceptual difficulties. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 12(2), 213-223.
44. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1987). Students' visualization of a chemical reaction. Education in Chemistry, 24(4), 117-120.
45. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1988). Theories, principles and laws. Education in Chemistry, 25(3), 89-92.
46. Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (1996). Strategies for remediating learning difficulties in chemistry. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 109-119). New York: Teachers College Press.
47. Ben-Zvi, R., & Silberstein, Y. (1986). Chemistry a challenge. Rehovot, Israel: The Weizmann Institute of Science.
48. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Billings-Gagliardi, S., & Mazor, K. M. (2007). Student Decisions about Lecture Attendance: Do Electronic Course Materials Matter? Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 82(10), S73-S76.
50. Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 235-258). New York: Worth Publishers.
51. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435-459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
54. Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K. R., Linn, M. C., et al. (2008, June 24). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
55. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
56. Bowyer, J. (1975). Science curriculum improvement study and scientific literacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
57. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
58. Bransford, J. D., Zech, L., Schwartz, D., Barron, B., Vye, N., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Fostering mathematical thinking in middle school students: Lessons from research. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 203-250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Braun, H., Coley, R., Jia, Y., & Trapani, C. (2009, May). Exploring what works in science instruction: A look at the eight-grade science classroom (Policy Information Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services (ETS).
60. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498.
61. Briggs, D., Alonzo, A., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 33-63.
62. Brook, A., Briggs, H., Bell, B., & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary students' understanding of heat: Full report. Leeds: CLIS Project.
63. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
65. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
66. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. In D. Kuhn (Ed.), Developmental Perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills (pp. 108-126). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
67. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
68. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological learning theory and the design of innovative environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L. Shauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Contributions of instructional innovation to understanding learning (pp. 289-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Bruner, J. S. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Buckley, B., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R., Gerlits, B., et al. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica: What do they learn? how do they learn? how do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 23-41.
72. Bumiller, E. (2010, April 26). We have met the enemy and he is PowerPoint [Electronic Version]. The New York Times. Retrieved August 12, 2010 from http://www.nytimes. com/2010/04/27/world/27powerpoint.html.
73. Burbules, N. C., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Response to contradiction: Scientific reasoning during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 67-75.
74. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
75. Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 89-111.
76. Cardall, S., Krupat, E., & Ulrich, M. (2008). Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 83(12), 1174-1178.
77. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
78. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235-251.
79. Case, R. (Ed.). (1978). Implications of developmental psychology for the design of effective instruction. New York: Plenum.
80. Case, R. (1980). Intellectual development from birth to adulthood: A neo-Piagetian interpretation. In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 37-72), Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
81. Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
82. Case, R. S., Griffin, S., & Kelly, W. (1999). Socioeconomic gradients in mathematical ability and their responsiveness to intervention during early childhood. In D. P. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Developmental health and the wealth of nations: Social, biological, and educational dynamics (pp. 125-152). New York: Guilford Press.
83. Casperson, J. M., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Using visualizations to teach electrostatics. American Journal of Physics, 74(4), 316-323.
84. Chall, J. S., & Squire, J. R. (1991). The publishing industry and textbooks. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 120-146). White Plains, NY: Longman.
85. Champagne, A. (1988). Kill all the mosquitoes or cure malaria, Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Philadelphia, PA.
86. Chang, H.-Y., & Quintana, C. (2006). Student-generated animations: supporting middle school students' visualization, interpretation and reasoning of chemical phenomena. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 71-77). Bloomington, Indiana: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
87. Chang, H.-Y., Shen, J., Chiu, J., Clark, D., Menekse, M., D'Angelo, C., et al. (2008). Improving the design and impact of interactive, dynamic visualizations for science learning. In International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ting a Learning World. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 221-228). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
88. ChanLin, L.-J. (2001). Formats and prior knowledge on learning in a computer-based lesson. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 409-419.
89. Chen, X. (1998). What kinds of teaching practices do faculty use in their undergraduate classes? Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences; Retrieved online from http://nces. ed.gov/das/epubs/2002209/what.asp.
90. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
91. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145-182.
92. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
93. Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. D. (1983). Network representation of child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 29-39.
94. Chi, M. T. H., & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Commentary on A. diSessa's “Toward an epistemology of physics”. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2/3), 249-260.
95. Chiu, J. L. (2006, April 9). Using powerful computer models to promote integrated understandings of chemical reactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
96. Chiu, J. L. (2010). Supporting students' knowledge integration with technology-enhanced inquiry curricula. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
97. Chiu, J., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Self-assessment and self-explanation for learning chemistry using dynamic molecular visualizations. In International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ting a Learning World: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 16-17). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
98. Chiu, J., & Linn, M. C. (in press). The role of self-monitoring in learning chemistry with dynamic visualization. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition and science education: Trends in current research. London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
99. Chiu, J. L., Zhang, H., Miller, D., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Comparing PhET and Molecular Workbench as visualizations to illustrate the features of fuels. VISUAL Annual report. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
100. Clancy, M., Titterton, N., Ryan, C., Slotta, J., & Linn, M. C. (2003). New roles for students, instructors, and computers in a lab-based introductory programming course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 132-136.
101. Clancy, M. J., & Linn, M. C. (1996). Designing Pascal solutions: Case studies with data structures (1st ed.). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
102. Clancy, M. J., & Linn, M. C. (1999). Patterns and pedagogy. Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Bulletin, 31(1), 37-42.
103. Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students' understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467-563.
104. Clark, D. B., D'Angelo, C. M., & Menekse, M. (2009). Initial structuring of online discussions to improve learning and argumentation: Incorporating students' own explanations as seed comments versus an augmented-preset approach to seeding discussions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 321-333.
105. Clark, D. B., & Jorde, D. (2004). Helping students revise disruptive experientially supported ideas about thermodynamics: Computer visualizations and tactile models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 1-23.
106. Clark, D. B., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Scaffolding knowledge integration through curricular depth. Journal of Learning Sciences, 12(4), 451-494.
107. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253-277.
108. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
109. Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. D., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., et al. (2010). Online learning environments, scientific argumentation, and 21st century skills. In B. Ertl (Ed.), E-collaborative knowledge construction: Learning from computer-supported and virtual environments (pp. 1-39). New York: IGI Global.
110. Clark, D. B., Varma, K., McElhaney, K., & Chiu, J. (2008). Design rationale within TELS projects to support knowledge integration. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 157-193). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
111. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257.
112. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
113. Collaborative e-Learning Structures (CeLS). http://www.mycels.net. Retrieved March 25, 2010, from http://www.mycels.net
114. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
115. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
116. Committee on Science and Technology Education. (1992). Tomorrow 98. Israel: Ministry of Education.
117. Cooke, N. J., & Breedin, S. D. (1994). Constructing naive theories of motion on the fly. Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 474-493.
118. Cooper, M. M., Cox, C. T., Jr., Nammouz, M., Case, E., & Stevens, R. (2008). An assessment of the effect of collaborative groups on students' problem-solving strategies and abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(6), 866-872.
119. Corliss, S., & Spitulnik, M. (2008). Student and teacher regulation of learning in technology-enhanced science instruction. In International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ting a Learning World. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 167-174). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
120. Coulson, D. (2002). BSCS Science: An inquiry approach-2002 evaluation findings. Annapolis, MD: PS International.
121. Crouch, C. H., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72(6), 835-838.
122. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.
123. Crouse, L., Schneps, M. H., Sadler, P. M., Private Universe Project, & Annenberg/CPB Math and Science Project. (1989). A private universe [teacher guide and video series]. Cambridge, MA: Private Universe Project, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
124. Davis, E. A. (2004a). Creating critique projects. In M. Linn, E. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 89-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
125. Davis, E. A. (2004b). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analysing teachers' knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 21-53.
126. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
127. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
128. Davis, E. A., & Miyake, M., (Eds.). (2004). Guest editors' introduction: Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems (Special Issue on Scaffolding). Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265-272.
129. Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651.
130. Davis, E. A., & Varma, K. (2008). Supporting teachers in productive adaptation. In Y. Kali, J. E. Roseman & M. C. Linn (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (pp. 94-122). New York: Teachers College Press.
131. Davis, K. S. (2003). "Change is hard": What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3-30.
132. del Pozo, R. M. (2001). Prospective teachers' ideas about the relationships between concepts describing the composition of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 353-371.
133. Department for Education and Employment. (2000). Science: The National Curriculum for England-Key Stages 1-4. London: The Stationery Office.
134. Derry, S. J., Seymour, J., Steinkuehler, C., Lee, J., & Siegel, M. A. (2004). From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: An evolving socio-technical design supporting community and collaborative learning in teacher education. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 256-295). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
135. deVries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103.
136. Dewey, J. (1901). Psychology and social practice (Vol. 11). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
137. diSessa, A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
138. diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
139. diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
140. diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why "conceptual ecology" is a good idea. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 29-60). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
141. diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293-331.
142. diSessa, A. A., & Minstrell, J. (1998). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. In J. G. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices (pp. 155-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
143. Dolan, K. (2008). Comparing modes of instruction: The relative efficacy of on-line and in-person teaching for student learning. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41(2), 387-391.
144. Dori, Y. J., Barak, M., & Adir, N. (2003). A Web-based chemistry course as a means to foster freshmen learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(9), 1084-1092.
145. Dory, E., Orad, Y., Orpaz, N., Angelmann, Y., Dayan, S., Harel, R., et al. (1989). Into the matter (In Hebrew). Maalot, Israel.
146. Driver, R. (1985). Changing perspectives on science lessons. In N. Bennett & C. Desforges (Eds.), Recent advances in classroom research, British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series, No. 2 (pp. 58-74). Edinburgh: Scottish Academy Press.
147. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
148. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
149. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
150. Dunbar, K. (1999). How scientists build models invivo science as a window on the scientific mind. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 85-99). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
151. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
152. Dussault, M., Sadler, P., Coyle, H., Gould, R., Reinfeld, E., Steel, S., et al. (2005). What do students (and teachers) understand about the universe? Using qualitative and quantitative assessments to inform and improve astronomy education efforts. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 37, 1210.
153. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.
154. Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2008). Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 31-52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
155. Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78-89.
156. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.) (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1017-1095). New York: Wiley.
157. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585-609.
158. Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technologysupported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
159. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquirybased learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391-450.
160. EduTube. (2008). What causes the different seasons (animation). Retrieved January 31, 2010, from http://www.edutube.org/en/video/what-causes-different-seasons-animation
161. Eldar, O., Eylon, B.-S., & Ronen, M. (in press). A metacognitive teaching strategy for pre-service teachers: Collaborative diagnosis of conceptual understanding in science. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition and science education: Trends in current research. London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
162. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103-127.
163. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
164. Estes, W. K. (1960). Learning theory and the new "mental chemistry." Psychological Review, 67(4), 207-223.
165. Eylon, B., Berger, H., & Bagno, E. (2008). An evidence based continuous professional development program on knowledge integration in physics: A study of teachers' collective discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 619-641.
166. Eylon, B.-S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58(3), 251-301.
167. Eylon, B.-S., Ronen, M., & Ganiel, U. (1996). Computer simulations as tools for teaching and learning: Using a simulation environment in optics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 5(2), 93-110.
168. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
169. Falk, J., & Drayton, B. (Eds.). (2009). Creating and sustaining online professional learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
170. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Learning by doing. Chemical Engineering Education, 37(4), 282-283.
171. Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84(5), 606-623.
172. Feldman, A., Konold, C., & Coulter, B. (2000). Network science, a decade later: The internet and classroom learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
173. Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. C., Stowe, K. A., & Showman, R. (2010). Translating expertise into effective instruction: The impacts of cognitive task analysis (CTA) on lab report quality and student retention in the biological sciences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1165-1185.
174. Fensham, P. (1994). Beginning to teach chemistry. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 14-28). London: Falmer.
175. Fensham, P. J. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for contextbased science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884-896.
176. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. L. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
177. Figlio, D. N., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2010). Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning (NBER Working Paper No. 16089). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
178. Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., et al. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1(1), 010103.
179. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405-441.
180. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643-658.
181. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
182. Ford, M. J., & Wargo, B. M. (2007). Routines, roles, and responsibilities for aligning scientific and classroom practices. Science Education, 91(1), 133-157.
183. Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2009). Enhancing students' understanding of the concept of "chemical bonding" by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 289-310.
184. Frederiksen, J., & White, B. (1992). Mental models and understanding: A problem for science education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 211-226). New York: Springer Verlag.
185. Gabel, D. L. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548-554.
186. Geir, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., et al. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922-939.
187. Geographic Data in Education (GEODE) Initiative. (2003). WorldWatcher: Overview. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www.worldwatcher.northwestern.edu/softwareWW. htm
188. Gerard, L. F., Bowyer, J. B., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Principal leadership for technologyenhanced science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 1-18.
189. Gerard, L. F., Spitulnik, M., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Teacher use of evidence to customize inquiry science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9): 1037-1063.
190. Gerard, L. F., Tate, E., Chiu, J., Corliss, S. B., & Linn, M. C. (2009). Computer support for collaborative learning. In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (Vol. 1, pp. 188-193). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
191. Gerard, L. F., Varma, K., Corliss, S. C., & Linn, M. C. (in press). A review of the literature on professional development in technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research.
192. Gilbert, J. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79.
193. Gildea, P. M., Miller, G. A., & Wurtenberg, C. L. (1990). Contextual enrichment by videodisc. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, & multimedia (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
194. Gobert, J. D., & Pallant, A. (2004). Fostering students' epistemologies of models via authentic model-based tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7-22.
195. Graesser, A. G., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 225-234.
196. Greene, J. (2007, June 7). Northgate High School anatomy students observe surgery at AGH [Electronic Version]. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Retrieved August 12, 2010 from http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_511146. html
197. Grigg, W., Lauko, M., & Brockway, D. (2006). The nation's report card: Science 2005 (NCES 2006-466). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
198. Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The Student laboratory and the science curriculum. New York: Routledge.
199. Guzdial, M., Turns, J., Rappin, N., & Carlson, D. (1995). Collaborative support for learning in complex domains. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning '95 (pp. 157-160). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
200. Hackbert, P. H. (2004). Building entrepreneurial teamwork competencies in collaborative learning via peer assessments. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 1(12), 39-52.
201. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
202. Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985a). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043-1055.
203. Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985b). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056-1065.
204. Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1998). Interpreting VASS dimensions and profiles for physics students. Science and Education, 7(6), 553-577.
205. Halsall, P. (1998). http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1859Faraday-forces.html. Retrieved January 28, 2010
206. Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note-taking: A critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15(3), 207-224.
207. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (Eds.). (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
208. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended?: A cognitivesociocultural view. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 407-427). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
209. Hays, T. (1996). Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on short-term and long-term comprehension. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 139-155.
210. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325-360.
211. Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627-636.
212. Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007). The change of science teachers personal knowledge about teaching models and modeling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1819-1846.
213. Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502, 504-506.
214. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158.
215. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
216. Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
217. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
218. Higgins, T. E. (2008). Through the eyes of professional developers: Understanding the design of learning experiences for science teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
219. Higgins, T. E., & Spitulnik, M. (2008). Supporting teachers' use of technology in science instruction through professional development: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 511-521.
220. Hilgard, E. R., & Bower, G. H. (1966). Theories of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
221. Hilton, M., & National Research Council (NRC). (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st Century Skills: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
222. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Derry, S. J., Woods, D., DelMarcelle, M., & Chernobilsky, E. (2005). From parallel play to meshed interaction: The evolution of the eSTEP system. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005: Computer support for collaborative learning: The next 10 years! (pp. 195-204). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
223. Hoadley, C. (2004). Fostering collaboration offline and online: Learning from each other. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. L. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 145-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
224. Hoadley, C. M., Hsi, S., & Berman, B. P. (1995). The multimedia forum kiosk and SpeakEasy. In Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 363-364). San Francisco, CA: ACM Press.
225. Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Teaching science through on-line, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 839-857.
226. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
227. Hoffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722-738.
228. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.
229. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
230. Holton, G. (2003). What historians of science and science educators can do for one another. Science & Education, 12(7), 603-616.
231. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
232. Horwitz, P., & Christie, M. (1999). Hypermodels: Embedding curriculum and assessment in computer-based manipulatives. Journal of Education, 181(2), 1-23.
233. Horwitz, P., & Tinker, R. (2001). Pedagogica to the rescue: A short history of hypermodels. @CONCORD, 5(1), 12-13.
234. Howe, A. (2002). Engaging children in science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
235. Howe, C., & Tolmie, A. (2003). Group work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from experts. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 51-72.
236. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Rattray, C. (2000). Hypothesis testing in science: Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 361-391.
237. Howe, K. (1998). The interpretive turn and the new debate in education. Educational Researcher, 27(8), 13-21.
238. Hsi, S. (1997). Facilitating knowledge integration in science through electronic discussion: The multimedia forum kiosk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
239. Hunt, E., & Minstrell, J. (1994). A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 51-74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
240. Hutchins, E. (2001). Distributed cognition. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (4th ed., pp. 2068-2072). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
241. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494-495.
242. Iles, A., Glaser, D., Kam, M., & Canny, J. (2002). Learning via distributed dialogue: Livenotes and handheld wireless technology [Electronic Version]. Retrieved March 25, 2010 from www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jfc/papers/02/IGKCcscl02.pdf.
243. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958/1972). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. New York: Basic Books.
244. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1969). The early growth of logic in the child. New York: Norton.
245. Israeli Ministry of Education. (1996). The Israeli national syllabus for junior high school (In Hebrew). Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of Education.
246. Israeli Ministry of Education. (1996). Science and technology curriculum for junior high schools (In Hebrew). Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of Education.
247. Izsak, A. (2004). Students' coordination of knowledge when learning to model physical situations. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 81-128.
248. Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 5, 43-46, 74-76.
249. Jeong, H., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35(4), 287-315.
250. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
251. Johnson, P. (1998). Progression in children's understanding of a 'basic' particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 393-412.
252. Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83.
253. Johnstone, A. H., & Percival, F. (1976). Attention breaks in lectures. Education in Chemistry, 13(2), 49-50.
254. Joseph, D. (2004). The practice of design-based research: Uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 235-242.
255. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002). Models and modeling in chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. D. Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 47-68). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
256. Justi, R., & van Driel, J. (2005). The development of science teachers' knowledge on models and modeling: Promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549-573.
257. Kafai, Y. B., Peppler, K. A., & Chapman, R. N. (Eds.). (2009). The computer clubhouse: Constructionism and creativity in youth communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
258. Kali, Y. (2002). Design Principles Database. Retrieved January 28, from http://www. edu-design-principles.org
259. Kali, Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge-building using the Design Principles Database. International Journal of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 187-201.
260. Kali, Y., Bos, N., Linn, M. C., Underwood, J., & Hewitt, J. (2002). Design principles for educational software. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, proceedings of CSCL. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
261. Kali, Y., Levin-Peled, R., Ronen-Fuhrmann, T., & Hans, M. (2009). The Design Principles Database: A multipurpose tool for the educational technology community. Design Principles & Practices: An International Journal, 3(1): 55-65.
262. Kali, Y., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Technology-enhanced support strategies for inquiry learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. V. Merriënboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 145-161). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
263. Kali, Y. & Linn, M. C. (2009). Designing effective visualizations for elementary school science. Elementary School Journal, 109(5): 181-198.
264. Kali, Y., Linn, M. C., & Roseman, J. E. (Eds.). (2008). Designing coherent science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
265. Kali, Y., & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 369-391.
266. Kali, Y., Orion, N., & Mazor, E. (1997). Software for assisting high school students in the spatial perception of geological structures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45(1), 10-21.
267. Kali, Y., & Ronen, M. (2005). Design principles for online peer-evaluation: Fostering objectivity. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005: Computer support for collaborative learning: The next 10 years! (pp. 247-251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
268. Kali, Y., & Ronen-Fuhrmann, T. (2007). How can the design of educational technologies affect graduate students' epistemologies about learning? In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2007: Mice, minds and society (pp. 320-322). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
269. Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., et al. (2005). Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. In Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 531-540). Portland, OR: ACM.
270. Kanari, Z., & Millar, R. (2004). Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in scientific investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 748-769.
271. Karplus, R., & Thier, H. D. (1971). SCIS: The science curriculum improvement study. New York: Macmillan.
272. Kehoe, C., Stasko, J., & Taylor, A. (2001). Rethinking the evaluation of algorithm animations as learning aids: An observational study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(2), 265-284
273. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
274. Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science program measure up? Findings from Project 2061's Curriculum Review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522-549.
275. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303-323.
276. Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
277. Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1989). Developmental differences in scientific discovery processes. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 109-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
278. Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661-667.
279. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Illustrating principled design: The early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization. Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 161-180.
280. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. In J. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings of AI-ED 95: World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 421-428). Washington, DC: AACE.
281. Kokkotas, P., Vlachos, I., & Koulaidis, V. (1998). Teaching the topic of the particulate nature of matter inprospective teachers' training courses. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 291-303.
282. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2005). Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: The next 10 years! (pp. 331-340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
283. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computersupported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning & Instruction, 17(6), 708-721.
284. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
285. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntembakar, S. (2003). Putting a student-centered learning by Design™ Curriculum into Practice: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-548.
286. Kolodner, J. L., Gray, J. T., & Fasse, B. B. (2003). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in Learning by Design™ classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3(2), 119-170.
287. Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
288. Koschmann, T., Myers, A. C., & Feltovich, P. J. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 227-264.
289. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and eficence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
290. Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-143.
291. Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Modelling students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 121-145). Dordrecht: Springer.
292. Kozma, R. B. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
293. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283-315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
294. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313-350.
295. Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
296. Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students' understanding of chemical concepts. In Y. S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yanny & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science: International perspective on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 117-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
297. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483-497.
298. Kraus, P. A. (1997). Promoting active learning in lecture-based courses: Demonstrations, tutorials, and interactive tutorial lectures. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation with Lillian C. McDermott, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9736313), University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
299. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., O'Loughlin, M., & Schauble, L. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
300. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
301. Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. L. (1979). College teaching. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings and implications (pp. 70-93). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Pub. Corp.
302. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 525-544.
303. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65-99.
304. Larson, E. (2006). Thunderstruck. New York: Random House.
305. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
306. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
307. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. In R. Pea & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp. 29-129). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
308. Laverty, D. T., & McGarvey, J. E. B. (1991). A constructivist approach to learning. Education in Chemistry, 28(4), 99-102.
309. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
310. Leach, J., Hind, A., & Ryder, J. (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions about the epistemology of science in high school classrooms. Science Education, 87(3), 831-848.
311. Lee, C. D. (1997). Bridging home and school literacies: Models for culturally responsive teaching, a case for African American English. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.), A handbook for literacy educators: Research on teaching the communicative and visual arts (pp. 334-345). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
312. Lee, C. D. (2009). Cultural influences on learning. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 239-251). New York: Routledge.
313. Lee, H.-S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2009). How does technology-enhanced inquiry instruction with visualizations impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71-90.
314. Lee, H.-S., Liu, O. L., & Linn, M. C. (in press). Validating measurement of knowledge integration in science using multiple-choice and explanation items. Applied Measurement in Education.
315. Lee, H. S., & Songer, N. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923-948.
316. Lee, V. R. (2010a). Adaptations and continuities in the use and design of visual representations in US middle school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1099-1126.
317. Lee, V. R. (2010b). How different variants of orbit diagrams influence students' explanations of the seasons. Science Education, 94(6), 985-1007.
318. Leighton, H. B. (1984). The lantern slide and art history. History of Photography, 8(2), 107-119.
319. Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (2002). Learning conversations in museums. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
320. Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1991). Indicators of transformational leadership in the everyday problem solving of school administrators. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(3), 221-244.
321. Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40(1), 1-18.
322. Lesgold, A. M. (1984). Acquiring expertise. In J. R. Anderson, & Kosslyn, S. M. (Ed.), Tutorials in learning and memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower (pp. 31-60). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
323. Lewis, C. (1995). Educating hearts and minds: Reflections on Japanese preschool and elementary education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
324. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement? The Case of Lesson Study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
325. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The case of elementary science instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(5), 313-331.
326. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: How research lessons improve Japanese education. American Educator, 22(4), 12-17, 50-52.
327. Lewis, C. C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: RBS, Inc.
328. Lewis, E. L. (1996). Conceptual change among middle school students studying elementary thermodynamics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 5(1), 3-31.
329. Lewis, S. E., & Lewis, J. E. (2008). Seeking effectiveness and equity in a large college chemistry course: An HLM investigation of Peer-Led Guided Inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 794-811.
330. Lewis, E. L., & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657-677.
331. Lewis, E. L., Stern, J., & Linn, M. C. (1993). The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding. Educational Technology, 33(1), 45-58.
332. Liben, L. S., Kastens, K. A., & Stevenson, L. M. (2002). Real-world knowledge through real-world maps: A developmental guide for navigating the educational terrain. Developmental Review, 22(2), 267-322.
333. Light, R. J. (1990). Explorations with students and faculty about teaching, learning, and student life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
334. Light, R. J. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
335. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123-1135.
336. Linn, M. C. (1980a). Free-choice experiences: How do they help children learn? Science Education, 64(2), 237-248.
337. Linn, M. C. (1980b). Teaching children to control variables: Some investigations using free choice experiences. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Toward a theory of psychological development within the Piagetian framework (pp. 673-697). Windsor, Berkshire, England: National Foundation for Educational Research Publishing Company.
338. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.
339. Linn, M. C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In K. G. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 265-294). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
340. Linn, M. C. (2003). Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727-758.
341. Linn, M. C. (2005). WISE design for lifelong learning-Pivotal Cases. In P. Gärdenfors & P. Johansson (Eds.), Cognition, education and communication technology (pp. 223-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
342. Linn, M. C., Bell, P., & Davis, E. A., (2004). Specific design principles: Elaborating the scaffolded knowledge integration framework. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 315-340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
343. Linn, M. C., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J., Zhang, H., & McElhaney, K. (2010). Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations? In A. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 239-262). New York: Routledge.
344. Linn, M. C., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J., Zhang, H., & McElhaney, K. (2010). Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations? In A. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 239-262). New York: Routledge.
345. Linn, M. C., & Clancy, M. J. (1992a). Can experts' explanations help students develop program design skills? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(4), 511-551.
346. Linn, M. C., & Clancy, M. J. (1992b). The case for case studies of programming problems. Communications of the ACM, 35(3), 121-132.
347. Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517-538.
348. Linn, M. C., Clement, C., Pulos, S., & Sullivan, T. (1989). Scientific reasoning during adolescence: The influence of instruction in science knowledge and reasoning strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2): 171-187.
349. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.). (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
350. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A. & Eylon, B.-S. (2004). The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 29-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
351. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (1996). Lifelong science learning: A longitudinal case study. In Proceedings of Cognitive Science Society, 1996 (pp. 597-602). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
352. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2000). Knowledge integration and displaced volume. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(4), 287-310.
353. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 511-544). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
354. Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
355. Linn, M. C., Husic, F., Slotta, J., & Tinker, R. (2006). Technology enhanced learning in science (TELS): Research Programs. Educational Technology, 46(3), 54-68.
356. Linn, M. C., & Kessel, C. (1996). Success in mathematics: Increasing talent and gender diversity among college majors. In J. Kaput, A. Schoenfeld & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 101-144). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
357. Linn, M. C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313(5790), 1049-1050.
358. Linn, M. C., Lewis, C., Tsuchida, I., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Beyond fourth-grade science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese students diverge? Educational Researcher, 29(3), 4-14.
359. Linn, M. C., & Muilenburg, L. (1996). Creating lifelong science learners: What models form a firm foundation? Educational Researcher, 25(5), 18-24.
360. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479-1498.
361. Linn, M. C., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). WISE science. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 29-32.
362. Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1993). How do students make sense of science? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 47-73.
363. Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., & Eylon, B. S. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In R. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 438-490). Riverside, NJ: Macmillan.
364. Linn, M. C., & Thier, H. D. (1975). The effect of experiential science on the development of logical thinking in children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(1), 49-62.
365. Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913-945.
366. Liu, O. L., Lee, H.-S., & Linn, M. C. (2010a). Multifaceted assessment of inquiry-based science learning. Educational Assessment, 15(2), 69-86.
367. Liu, O. L., Lee, H.-S., & Linn, M. C. (2010b). An investigation of teacher impact on student inquiry science performance using a hierarchical linear model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 807-819.
368. Liu, O. L., Lee, H. S., Hofstetter, C., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Assessing knowledge integration in science: Construct, measures and evidence. Educational Assessment, 13(1), 33-55.
369. Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Reiser, B. J., Gomez, L. M., Edelson, D. C., & Russell, E. (1997). The progress portfolio: Promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments. In R. Hall, N. Miyake & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 176-185). Toronto, Ontario: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
370. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
371. Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2006). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. American Journal of Physics, 74(2), 118-122.
372. Lundberg, M., Levin, B., & Harrington, H. (Eds.). (1999). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
373. Madhok, J. J. (2006). The longitudinal impact of an eighth grade inquiry curriculum on students' beliefs and achievement in science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation with J. Slotta & M. C. Linn-Advisors, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3228414).
374. Margel, H. (1999). About fibers (In Hebrew). Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.
375. Margel, H., Eylon, B., & Scherz, Z. (2004). “We actually saw atoms with our own eyes”: Conceptions and convictions in using the Scanning Tunneling Microscope in junior high school. Journal of Chemical education, 81(4), 558-566.
376. Margel, H., Eylon, B.-S., & Scherz, Z. (2006). From textiles to molecules-teaching about fibers to integrate students' macro-and microscale knowledge of materials. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 1552.
377. Margel, H., Eylon, B., & Scherz, Z. (2008). A longitudinal study of junior high school students' conceptions of the structure of materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 132-152.
378. Masnick, A. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Error matters: An initial exploration of elementary school children's understanding of experimental error. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4(1), 67-98.
379. Mathison, M. A. (1996). Writing the critique, a text about a text. Written Communication, 13(3), 314-354.
380. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(4), 256-265.
381. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
382. Mazzei, P. (2008). Using evolution as a context to promote student understanding of nature of science. Unpublished Master's Thesis, submitted in partial fulfillment of Master's of Arts degree in Education, University of California, Berkeley.
383. McDermott, L. C. (1991). Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned -Closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59(4), 301-315.
384. McDermott, L. C. (2001). Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: Physics education research-The key to student learning. American Journal of Physics, 69(11), 1127-1137.
385. McDermott, L. C. (2006). Preparing K-12 teachers in physics: Insights from history, experience, and research. American Journal of Physics, 74(9), 758-762.
386. McElhaney, K., & Linn, M. C. (2010, May 4). What can students learn by comparing rather than isolating variables? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Denver, CO.
387. McElhaney, K. W. (2010). Making controlled experimentation more informative in inquiry investigations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
388. McElhaney, K. W., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Impacts of students' experimentation using a dynamic visualization on their understanding of motion. In International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ting a learning world. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 51-58). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
389. McLelland, C. V. (2006). The nature of science and the scientific method. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
390. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
391. Metcalf, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Model-It: A design retrospective. In J. M. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced design for technologies of learning (pp. 77-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
392. Metz, K. E. (2000). Young children's inquiry in biology. Building the knowledge bases to empower independent inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 3-13). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
393. Metz, K. E. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219-290.
394. Millar, R. (1990). Making sense: What use are particles to children? In P. Lijnse, P. Licht, W. d. Vos & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles (pp. 283-293). Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
395. Miyahara, K. (2007). The impact of the lantern slide on art-history lecturing in Britain. British Art Journal, Autumn.
396. Mokros, J. R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 369-383.
397. Muller, R. A. (2010). Physics and technology for future presidents: An introduction to the essential physics every world leader needs to know. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
398. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O'Connor, K. M., et al. (1999). Trends in mathematics and science study: International mathematics report. Boston, MA: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
399. Nakhleh, M. B., Samarapungavan, A., & Saglam, Y. (2005). Middle school students' beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 581-612.
400. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). http://nces.ed.gov/. Retrieved March 23, 2010
401. National Educational Goals Panel. (1998). Ready schools: A report of the goal 1 ready schools resource group. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
402. National Geographic Society (U.S.). Berwald, J., Guazzotti, S. A., & Fisher, D. (2007). Focus on earth science California, Grade 6. Princeton, NJ: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co.
403. National Research Council (NRC). (1999). Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
404. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
405. National Research Council (NRC). (2000). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
406. National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
407. National Research Council (NRC). (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
408. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. London: Cambridge University Press.
409. Nicole, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473.
410. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
411. Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study. Science Education, 62, 273-281.
412. Nuffield Curriculum Centre/Foundation, & The University of York. (2006). Twenty-first century science (curriculum suite). London: Oxford University Press.
413. Nussbaum, J. (1985). The Earth as a cosmic body. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 170-192). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
414. Nussbaum, J. (1998). History and philosophy, philosophy of science and the preparation for constructivitist teaching: The case of particle theory. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 165-192). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
415. Nussbaum, J. (2000). The structure of matter: Vacuum and particles. Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.
416. Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accomodation: toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183-200.
417. O'Sullivan, C. Y., Lauko, M. A., Grigg, W. S., Qian, J., & Zhang, J. (2003). The nation's report card: Science 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
418. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2000). Living narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
419. Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45-61.
420. Odubunmi, O., & Balogun, T. A. (1991). The effect of laboratory and lecture teaching methods on cognitive achievement in integrated science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 213-224.
421. Old Computers Online Database. (2009). http://oldcomputers.net/macportable.html. Retrieved June 2, 2010, from http://oldcomputers.net/macportable.html
422. Osborne, J., Black, P., Smith, M., & Meadows, J. (1990). Space project research report: Light. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
423. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
424. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
425. Pallant, A., & Tinker, R. (2004). Reasoning with atomic-scale molecular dynamic models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 51-66.
426. Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147-165.
427. Papert, S. (1968). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
428. Pea, R., Wulf, W. A., Elliott, S. W., & Darling, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
429. Pedone, R., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001). The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 29(2), 214-221.
430. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
431. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B., Gallagher, L., Korbak, C., & Lopez-Prado, B. (2008). Is alignment enough? Investigating the effects of state policies and professional development on science curriculum implementation. Science Education, 93(4), 656-677.
432. Petrosino, A. J., Martin, T., & Svihla, V. (Eds.). (2007). Developing student expertise and community: Lessons from how people learn: New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 108). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
433. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1991). Students' alternative frameworks (3rd ed.). Federal Republic of Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel/Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften.
434. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed.). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education.
435. PhET. (2010). http://phet.colorado.edu/. Retrieved July 10, 2010
436. Piaget, J. (1964). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
437. Piaget, J. (1970a). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Orion Press.
438. Piaget, J. (1970b). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
439. Pinker, S. (2010, June 10). Mind over mass media [Electronic version]. The New York Times. Retrieved August 12, 2010 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/ opinion/11Pinker.html?_r=1&ref=intelligence.
440. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
441. Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
442. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (1998). The design diary: A tool to support students in learning science by design. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 98) (pp. 35-41). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
443. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Golan, R. D., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337-386.
444. Rainie, L., & Hitlin, P. (2005). The internet at school. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
445. Razel, M., & Eylon, B.-S. (1986). Developing visual language skills: The Agam Program. Journal of Visual and Verbal Languaging, 6(1), 49-54.
446. Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
447. Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory Physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 212-224.
448. Reid, F. (2001). The stage lighting handbook (stage and costume). London, UK: A & C Black.
449. Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 1-34.
450. Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273-304.
451. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahway, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
452. Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (Eds.). (2002a). Building virtual communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
453. Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2002b). Community building with and for teachers at the Math Forum. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities (pp. 60-95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
454. Richland, L. E., Linn, M. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). Chapter 21: Instruction. In F. T. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 555-583). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
455. Ridgeway, D. (1971). CHEM study-Its background-Its influence-Its revisions. Canadian Chemical Education, 6, 5-9.
456. Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 669-692.
457. Rogers, M. P., Abell, S., Lannin, J., Wang, C.-Y., Musikul, K., Barker, D., et al. (2007). Effective professional development in science and mathematics education: Teachers' and facilitators' views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 507-532.
458. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
459. Ronen-Fuhrmann, T., & Kali, Y. (2009). Characterizing and instructing design knowledge in the context of educational technology design. In Proceedings of the 4th Chais conference on instructional technologies research, 2009 (In Hebrew) (pp. 168-176). Raanana: The Open University.
460. Roseman, J. E., Kesidou, S., Stern, L., & Caldwell, A. (1999). Heavy books light on learning: AAAS Project 2061 evaluates middle grades science textbooks. Science Books and Films, 35(6), 243-247.
461. Roseman, J. E., Linn, M. C., & Koppal, M. (2008). Characterizing curriculum coherence. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (pp. 13-38). New York: Teachers College Press.
462. Roth, K. (1991). Reading science texts for conceptual change. In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alverman (Eds.), Science learning processes and applications (pp. 48-63). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
463. Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., et al. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (statistical analysis report NCES 2006-011). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
464. Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521-562.
465. Rubin, A., & Doubler, S. J. (2009). The role of representations in shaping a community of scientific inquiry online. In J. Falk & B. Drayton (Eds.), Creating and sustaining online professional learning communities (pp. 153-174). New York: Teachers College Press.
466. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S.-P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students' scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583-608.
467. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessments: An update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1045-1063.
468. Russell, J., & Kozma, R. (2005). Assessing learning from the use of multimedia chemical visualization software. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 299-332). London: Kluwer.
469. Sadler, P. M. (1992). The initial knowledge state of high school astronomy students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
470. Sadler, T., Barab, S., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391.
471. Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education Review, 26(4), 387-409.
472. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2007). Incorporating scientific argumentation into inquirybased activities with online personally-seeded discussions. The Science Scope, 30(6), 43-47.
473. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448-484.
474. Sampson, V. D., & Clark, D. B. (2011). Comparison of more and less successful groups in collaboration. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 63-97.
475. Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372.
476. Saxe, G. B. (1999). Cognition, development, and cultural practices. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 83, 19-35.
477. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
478. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1998). Web knowledge forum: User guide. Santa Cruz, CA: Learning in Motion.
479. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today's children tomorrow's society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274-289). New York: Guildford.
480. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
481. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Hewitt, J., & Webb, J. (1996). Constructive learning from texts in biology. In K. M. Fischer & M. Kirby (Eds.), Relations and biology learning: The acquisition and use of knowledge structures in biology (pp. 44-64). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
482. Schank, P., & Kozma, R. (2002). Learning chemistry through the use of a representationbased knowledge building environment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 253-279.
483. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
484. Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
485. Schaps, E. (2003). Creating a school community. Creating Caring Schools, 60(6), 31-33.
486. Schaps, E., Battistich, V., & Solomon, D. (2004). Community in school as key to student growth: Findings from the child development project. In J. Zins, R. Weissberg, M. Wang & H. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 189-205). New York: Teachers College Press.
487. Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (1996). Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
488. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., et al. (Eds.). (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
489. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1996). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education: U.S. National Research Center for the Third International Mathematics Science Study, Michigan State University.
490. Schmidt, W. H., Raizen, S. A., Britton, E. D., Bianchi, L. J., & Wolfe, R. G. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school science. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
491. Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher eanctments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 283-312.
492. Schneps, M. H., & Sadler, P. M. (1989). A private universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
493. Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
494. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
495. Seethaler, S., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Genetically modified food in perspective: An inquirybased curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1765-1785.
496. Shakhashiri, B. Z. (1985). Chemical demonstrations (Vol. 2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
497. Shear, L., Bell, P., & Linn, M. (2004). Partnership models: The case of the deformed frogs. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 289-314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
498. Shen, J., & Linn, M. C. (in press). A Technology-enhanced unit of modeling static electricity: Integrating scientific explanations and everyday observations. International Journal of Science Education
499. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
500. Sherin, B., Reiser, B. J., & Edelson, D. C. (2004). Scaffolding analysis: Extending the scaffolding metaphor to learning artifacts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 387-421.
501. Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71(1), 26-35.
502. Simon, B., Anderson, R., Hoyer, C., & Su, J. (2004). Preliminary experiences with a tablet PC based system to support active learning in computer science courses. In Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on innovation and technology in computer science education. Leeds, United Kingdom: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
503. Sinapuelas, M. (2010). Performance predictors: A study of introductory chemistry students' circumstances and their influence on students' study strategies and performance. Unpublished Dissertation Proposal, University of California, Berkeley.
504. Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2005). America's lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
505. Sisk-Hilton, S. (2009). Teaching and learning in public: Professional development through shared inquiry. Columbia, NY: Teachers College Press.
506. Skamp, K. (1999). Are atoms and molecules too difficult for primary children? School Science Review, 81, 87-96.
507. Skoog, G. (1979). Topic of evolution in secondary school biology textbooks: 1900-1977. Science Education, 63(5), 621-640.
508. Skoog, G. (2005). The emphasis on human evolution in the high school biology textbooks of the 20th century and the current state science standards. Science and Education, 14(3-5), 395-422.
509. Slator, B. M. (2006). Electric worlds in the classroom: Teaching and learning with role-based computer games. New York: Teachers College Press.
510. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
511. Slotta, J., & Aleahmad, T. (2002). Integrating handheld technology and web-based science activities. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2002 (Vol. 1, pp. 25-30). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
512. Slotta, J. D. (2004). The web-based inquiry science environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203-232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
513. Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 261-289.
514. Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing the ontological nature of conceptual physics: A contrast of experts and novices. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 373-400.
515. Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2000). The knowledge integration environment: Helping students use the internet effectively. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 193-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
516. Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2009). WISE science: Web-based inquiry in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
517. Smith, J. P., III, diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowlege in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.
518. Snyder, L., Aho, A. V., Linn, M. C., Packer, A., Tucker, A., Ullman, J., et al. (1999). Be FIT! Being fluent with information technology. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
519. Sokoloff, D. R., & Thornton, R. K. (2004). Interactive lecture demonstrations in introductory physics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
520. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. ACM Interactions, 1(2), 36-48.
521. Songer, N., Lee, H. S., & McDonald, S. (2003). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87(4), 490-516.
522. Songer, N. B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms-A case of kids as global scientists. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(4), 297-327.
523. Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128-150.
524. Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761-784.
525. Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459-480.
526. Spitulnik, M. W., & Linn, M. C. (2007). Professional development and teachers' curriculum customizations: Supporting science in diverse middle schools (MODELS Report). University of California, Berkeley.
527. Sprott, J. C. (1991). Physics to the people. The Physics Teacher, 29, 212-213.
528. Steinkuehler, C. (2008). Massively multiplayer online games as an educational technology: An outline for research. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 48(1), 10-21.
529. Stern, J. L., & Kirkpatrick, D. H. (1991). Computer as lab partner project. Chemunications Newsletter, VI 1(2), 1, 14-15.
530. Stern, L., & Roseman, J. (2004). Can middle school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538-568.
531. Stieff, M. (2005). Connected chemistry: A novel modeling environment for the chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(489-493).
532. Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighthgrade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States (NCES 1999-074). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
533. Stipek, D., Salmon, J. M., Givvin, K. B., Kazemi, E., Saxe, G., & MacGyvers, V. L. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 465-488.
534. Strauss, S. (2005). Teaching as a natural cognitive ability: Implications for classroom practice and teacher education. In D. B. Pillemer & S. H. White (Eds.), Developmental psychology and social change: Research, history, and policy (pp. 368-388). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
535. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211-231). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
536. Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331-356.
537. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.
538. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning, procedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 577-584). Maastrict, The Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht.
539. Svihla, V., Ryoo, K., Sato, E., Swanson, H., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Measuring cumulative learning across disciplines. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 252-259). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
540. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-335.
541. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. J. (1997). Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding and teacher-student interactions in inquiry learning. In R. Hall, N. Miyake & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning '97 (pp. 289-298). Toronto, Canada.
542. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Software-realized inquiry support for cultivating a disciplinary stance. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 307-355.
543. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143-1144.
544. Tal, T., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Urban schools teachers enacting projectbased science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 722-745.
545. Tarbuck, E. J., & Lutgens, F. K. (2008). Earth science (12th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
546. Tate, E. D. (2009). Asthma in the community: Designing instruction to help students explore scientific dilemmas that impact their lives. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
547. Taylor, R. (Ed.). (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
548. Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaborations? In L. B. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Situated cognition and technologically supported environments (pp. 361-384). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
549. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
550. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
551. The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation. (2007). http://www.woodrow. org/teachers/ci/faraday/lect1.html. Retrieved September 10, 2010
552. Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 228-351.
553. Tinker, R. (2008). Forward. In Y. Kali, J. E. Roseman, & M. C. Linn (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (pp. vii-x). New York: Teachers College Press.
554. Tinker, R., & Staudt, C. (2009). The greenhouse effect @ Concord (pp. 12-13). Concord, MA: Concard Consortium.
555. Tinker, R., & Xie, Q. (2008). Applying computational science to education: The Molecular Workbench paradigm. Computing in Science and Engineering, 10(5), 24-27.
556. Titterton, N., Lewis, C. M., & Clancy, M. J. (2010). Experiences with lab-centric instruction. Computer Science Education, 20(2), 79-102.
557. Topping, K. J. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (Vol. 1, pp. 55-87), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
558. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
559. Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and understanding. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
560. Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instruction materials on elementary school students' ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 149-173.
561. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Chelshire, CT: Graphics Press.
562. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247-262.
563. Tweney, R. D. (1991). Faraday's notebooks: The active organization of creative science. Physics Education, 26, 301-306.
564. Tyson, H. (1997). Overcoming structural barriers to good textbooks. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
565. Tyson-Bernstein, H., & Woodward, A. (1991). Nineteenth century policies for twentyfirst century practice: The textbook reform dilemma. In P. G. Altbach, G. P. Kelly, H. G. Petrie & L. Weis (Eds.), Textbooks in American society (pp. 91-104). New York: State University of New York Press.
566. University of Maryland Physics Education Research Group. (Fall 2002). 'Class discussion: the president-for-life of mistake-avoidance strategies,' available online at: http://www. physics.umd.edu/perg/ILD/ILD_01_Motion_Graphs.pdf
567. Van Dijk, L. A., Van Der Berg, G. C., & Van Keulen, H. (2001). Interactive lectures in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 15-28.
568. van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1255-1272.
569. Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59(10), 891-897.
570. van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159-190.
571. van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse: developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209-228.
572. VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227-265.
573. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31(1), 3-62.
574. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., et al. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Five years of evaluations. In G. McCalla, C. K. Looi, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 678-685). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
575. Varma, K., & Linn, M. C. (in press). Using interactive technology to support students' understanding of the greenhouse effect and global warming. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
576. Varma, K., Husic, F., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Targeted support for using technologyenhanced science inquiry modules. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 341-356.
577. Varma, K., Gerard, L., Liu, O. L., Corliss, S., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Comparison of two professional development programs on student learning. Paper to be presented at the 2011 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
578. Vos, P., & Kuiper, W. (2005). Trends (1995 -2000) in the TIMSS mathematics performance assessment in the Netherlands. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(2), 141-154.
579. Vosniadou, S., (Ed.) (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York, Routledge.
580. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
581. Watson, M., & Ecken, L. (2003). Learning to trust: Transforming difficult elementary classrooms through developmental discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
582. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middleschool mathematics. In A. M. O'Donnell, & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. (pp. 117-149). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
583. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369-395.
584. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. M. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
585. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007b). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416-426.
586. Weinberger, A., Clark, D., Häkkinen, P., Tamura, Y., & Fischer, F. (2007a). Argumentative knowledge construction in online learning environments in and across different cultures: A collaboration script perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 68-79.
587. Weizmann Institute of Science. (2009). MATMON curriculum. Retrieved January 1, 2010, from http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/menu/groups/index.html
588. Wells, L. B. (2010). Designing teacher practices to capitalize on online science assessments. Unpublished Master's thesis, submitted in partial fulfillment of Master's of Arts degree in Education, University of California, Berkeley.
589. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
590. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artificial Intelligence 42, 99-157.
591. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
592. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (2000). Technological tools and instructional approaches for making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education (pp. 321-359). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
593. White, B. Y., Shimoda, T. A., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development. The International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(2), 1-33.
594. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. New York: The Falmer Press.
595. Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance Learning. Science, 322(5902), 682-683.
596. Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (in press). An introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
597. Williams, M. (2008). Moving technology to the center of instruction: How one experienced teacher incorporates a web-based environment over time. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 316-333.
598. Williams, M., Linn, M. C., Ammon, P., & Gearhart, M. (2004). Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 189-206.
599. Wilson, C., Taylor, J., Kowalski, S., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects of inquirybased and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning and argumentation: A randomized control trial. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276-301.
600. Winerip, M. (2010, July 18). A popular principal, wounded by government's good intentions [Electronic version]. The New York Times. Retrieved September 10, 2010 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/education/19winerip.html.
601. WISE (1998). wise.berkeley.edu. Retrieved February 10, 2010
602. Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 267-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
603. Xie, Q., & Tinker, R. (2006). Molecular dynamics simulations of chemical reactions for use in education. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 77-83.
604. Yacoubian, H. A., & BouJaoude, S. (2010). The effect of reflective discussions following inquiry-based laboratory activities on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1229-1250.
605. Yang, E.-M., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 329-349.
606. Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Penuel, W. R. (2006). Using handheld computers to support improved classroom assessment in science: Results from a field trial. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 142-155.
607. Yayon, M., Margel, H., & Scherz, Z. (2001). From elements to complex structure. Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.
608. Yayon, M., & Scherz, Z. (2008). The return of the black box. Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 541-543.
609. Zhang, Z. (2010, March 22). Promote learning with dynamic visualizations: Drawing and selection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, PA.
610. Zhang, Z., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Using drawings to support learning from dynamic visualizations. In International perspectives in the learning sciences: Creating a learning world. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 161-162). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
611. Zhang, Z., & Linn, M. C. (2010). How can selection and drawing support learning from dynamic visualizations? In K. Gomez, L. Lyons & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, pg. 165-166). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
612. Zilag, Y., Orpaz, N., Ben-Zvi, N., Dory, E., Novick, S., Robinfeld, S., et al. (1980). Chemistry and electricity. Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of Education.
613. Zohar, A. (2006). The nature and development of teachers' metastrategic knowledge in the context of teaching higher order thinking. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 15(3), 331-377.
614. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
615. Zohar, A., & Peled, B. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low-and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 337-353.
616. Zucker, A. A. (2008). Transforming schools with technology: How smart use of digital tools helps achieve six key education goals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.