Beliefs about science: how does science instruction contribute?

Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 321-346

  Bell, Philip ^a   Linn, Marcia C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917403941     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203424964     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Bell, P. (1998). Designing for students' science learning using argumentation and classroom debate. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
2. Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The Knowledge Integration Environment: Theory and design. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL '95, Bloomington, IN(pp. 14-21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning on the Web in KIE. International Journal ofScience Education, Special Issue, 22(8),797-817.
4. Burbules, N. C. & Linn, M. C. (1991). Science education and the philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? International Journal of Science Education, J3(3), 227-241.
5. Carey, S. & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235-251.
6. Carey, S. & Smith, C. (1995). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies(pp. 39-55). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Caribiner International. (1999). [Film]. Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners. (Available from Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.)
8. Case, R., (1978). Implications ofdevelopmental psychology for the design ofeffective instruction. Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. New York: Plenum.
9. Cetina, K. N. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Champagne, A. (1998). Kill all the mosquitoes or cure malaria? American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]; Philadelphia, PA.
11. Chen, Z. and D. Klahr (1999). All other things being equal: Children's acquisition and transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development70: 1098-1120.
12. Clark, D. & Slotta, J. D. (in press). Interpreting evidence on the Internet: Sex, lies, and multimedia. International Journal ofScience Education, Special issue 22(8), 859-871.
13. Covington, M. V. (1984). The motive for self-worth. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Ed.) (pp. 78-114). New York: Academic Press.
14. Darwin, C. (1975). The origin of species(6th ed.). Franklin Center, PA: Franklin Library.
15. Davis, E. A. (1998). Scaffolding students' reflection for science learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
16. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK, Open University Press.
17. Eylon, B. S. & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review ofEducational Research58(3): 251-301.
18. Hsi, S. (1997). Facilitating knowledge integration in science through electronic discussion: The Multimedia Forum Kiosk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
19. Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction offormal operational structures. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20. Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1970). The early growth of logic in the child; Classification and seriation. New York, Humanities Press.
21. Jasanoff, S. (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
23. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., O'Loughlin, M., & with the assistance of L. Schauble (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills, (Developmental Psychology Series). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction ofscientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Lewis, E. L. & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching31(6): 657-677.
26. Linn, M. C. (1998). When good intentions and subtle stereotypes clash: The complexity of selection decisions. Educational Researcher, 27(9), 15-17.
27. Linn, M. C. (April 25, 1999). Controversy, the Internet, and deformed frogs: Making science accessible. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences annual meeting symposium (NAS '99: Washington, DC).
28. Linn, M. C., de Benedictis, T., & Delucchi, K. (1982). Adolescent reasoning about advertisements: Preliminary investigations. Child Development, 53, 1599-1613.
29. Linn, M.C. & Clark, H. (November, 1997). When are science projects learning opportunities? Research Matters-To the Science Teacher, National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
30. Linn, M. C., Clement, C., Pulos, S., & Sullivan, T. (1989). Scientific reasoning during adolescence: The influence of instruction in science knowledge and reasoning strategies. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 26(2),171-187.
31. Linn, M. C. & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Linn, M. C. & Pulos, S. (1983). Male-female differences in predicting displaced volume: Strategy usage, aptitude relationships, and experience influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 86-96.
33. Linn, M. C., Shear, L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J. D. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about 'rats in space' and 'deformed frogs.' Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(2),61-85.
34. Madhok, J. J. (1992). Effect of gender composition on group interaction. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 371-385). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California at Berkeley.
35. Madhok, J.. Longitudinal impact of a technology enhanced inquiry curriculum on views of science learning and science career choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
36. Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology: The science of the living world. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
37. Nersessian, N. J. (1989). Conceptual change in science and in science education. Synthese, 80, 163-183.
38. Piaget, J. (1968). Le Structuralisme. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.
39. Piaget, J. (1969). The child's conception of the world. Totowa, NJ, Littlefield, Adams & Co. Roth, K. J. (1989). Science education: It's not enough to 'do' or 'relate.' American Educator, 16-22, 46-48.
40. Sayre, A. (1975). Rosalind Franklin and DNA. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc.
41. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
42. Shear, L. (1998). When science learners are language learners: Designing linguistically aware instruction to teach science 'the knew way' Unpublished master's thesis. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
43. Siegler, R. S. & Richards, D. D. (1979). The development of time, speed, and distance concepts. Developmental Psychology15: 288-298.
44. Songer, N. B. (1989). Promoting integration of instructed and natural world knowledge in thermodynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
45. Strauss, S. (1977). Educational implications of V-shaped behavioural growth. [A position paper for the Ford Foundation], Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University.
46. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy ofscience, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
47. Tschirgi, J. E. (1980). Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development, 51, 1-10.
48. Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. (1968). The Double helix. New York: New American Library.
49. Wellesley College Center for Research on Women (1992). How schools shortchange girls (Executive Summary). Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, AAUW.