Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning

Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 31-51

  Dweck, Carol S ^a   Master, Allison ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920645807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203831076     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125.
2. Beer, J. S. (2002). Implicit self-theories of shyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1009-1024.
3. Biddle, S., Wang, J., Chatzisaray, N., & Spray, C. M. (2003). Motivation for physical activity in young people: Entity and incremental beliefs about athletic ability. Journal ofSports Sciences, 21, 973-989.
4. Binet, A. (1973). Les idees modernes sur les enfants [Modern ideas on children]. Paris: Flammarion. (Original work published 1909)
5. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263.
6. Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social- cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 X 2 achieve¬ment goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666-679.
7. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
8. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
9. Dweck, C. S., Mangels, J., & Good, C. (2004). Motivational effects on attention, cognition, and performance. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrated perspectives on intellectualfunctioning (pp. 41-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Good, C., Dweck, C. S., & Rattan, A. (2006). Talking about genius: The impact of genius as natural versus genius as effort-based on students’ reactions to difficult math problems. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New York.
11. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
12. Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599-615.
13. Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.
14. Kamins, M., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835-847.
15. Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social-cognitive-neuroscience model. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75-86.
16. Martocchio, J. J. (1994). Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, selfefficacy, and learning in training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 819-825.
17. Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61, 192-203.
18. Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Intelligence praise can undermine motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52.
19. Niiya, Y., Crocker, J., & Bartmess, E. N. (2004). From vulnerability to resilience: Learning orientations buffer contingent self-esteem from failure. Psychological Science, 15, 801-805.
20. Nussbaum, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Self-theories and self-esteem maintenance. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
21. Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 23, 141-157.
22. Raven, J. C. (1976). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Psychologists Press.
23. Rhodewalt, F. (1994). Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality, 62, 67-85.
24. Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Selfand Identity, 1, 313-336.
25. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Intelligence, competence, and expertise. In A. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), The handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 15-30). New York: Guilford Press.
26. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415.