Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform

Educational Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 331-356

  Supovitz, Jonathan A ^a   Mayer, Daniel P ^a   Kahle, Jane B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044518829     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904800014003001     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arons, A. B. (1989). What science should we teach? In the Biological Science Curriculum Study (Ed.), A BSCS thirtieth anniversary symposium: Curriculum development for the year 2000 (pp. 13-20). Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
2. Mayer, D. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policy makers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 29-45.
3. McDermott, L. C. (1996). Physics by inquiry (2 Vols.). New York: John Wiley.
4. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
5. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
6. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Porter, A. C., Kirst, M. W., Osthoff, E. J., Smithson, J. L., & Schneider, S. A. (1993). Reform up close: An analysis of high school mathematics and science classrooms. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
8. Rogosa, D., & Saner, H. (1995). Longitudinal data analysis examples with random coefficient models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(2), 149-170.
9. Rogosa, D. R., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 726-748.
10. Seltzer, M. H., Frank, K. A., & Bryk, A. S. (1994). The metric matters: The sensitivity of conclusions about growth in student achievement to choice of metric. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1), 41-49.
11. Shields, P. M., Marsh, J., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). The SSI's impacts on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
12. Smylie, M. A. (1994). Redesigning teachers' work: Connections to the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 20, 129-177.
13. Vinovskis, M. A. (1996). An analysis of the concept and uses of systemic educational reform. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 53-85.
14. Weiss, I. R., Matti, M. C., & Smith, P. S. (1994). Report of the 1993 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
15. Willett, J. B. (1994). Measuring change more effectively by modeling individual change over time. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
16. Zucker, A. A., Shields, P. M., Adelman, N., & Powell, J. (1995). Evaluation of the National Science Foundation's Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI) program: Second-year report. Part I: Cross-cutting themes (SRI Project 3612). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.