Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 538-568

  Stern, Luli ^a   Roseman, Jo Ellen ^b  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b AAAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIFE SCIENCES; MIDDLE SCHOOLS; SCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH;

ECOLOGY; NATURAL SCIENCES; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

CURRICULA;

EID: 4344578210     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20019     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W., & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understanding and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.
2. Agnes, M.E. (Ed.) (2001). Webster's New World College Dictionary (4th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
3. AAAS. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. AAAS. (2001a). Atlas for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. AAAS. (2001b). Project 2061 AAAS science textbook conference [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Author.
7. AAAS. (2004). Resources for science literacy: Curriculum materials. New York: Oxford University Press. Manuscript in preparation.
8. Anderson, C., Sheldon, T., & Dubay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on college nonmajors' conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 761-776.
9. Anderson, C.W. & Smith, E. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), The educator's handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84-111). New York: Longman.
10. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (1997). Education update. Vol. 39, No. 1.
11. Ball, D.L. & Cohen, D.K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25, 8-14.
12. Ball, D.L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18, 401-423.
13. Barker, M. & Carr, M. (1989). Teaching and learning about photosynthesis. Part 1: An assessment in terms of students' prior knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 49-56.
14. Bell, B. & Brook, A. (1984). Aspects of secondary students' understanding of plant nutrition. Leeds, United Kingdom: University of Leeds Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
15. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (1999). Middle School Science & Technology. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
16. Bishop, B. & Anderson, C. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
17. Brearton, M.A. & Shuttleworth, S. (1999, Winter). Racing a comet. Journal of Staff Development, 20, 30-33.
18. Caldwell, A. & Stern, L. (2000, April). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061' Curriculum Evaluation Study: Earth Science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
19. Carlsson, B. (2002a). Ecological understanding: 1. Ways of experiencing photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 681-699.
20. Carlsson, B. (2002b). Ecological understanding: 2. Transformation - A key to ecological understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 701-715.
21. Champagne, A., Gunstone, R., & Klopfer, L. (1985). Instructional consequences of students' knowledge about physical phenomena. In L. West & A.L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 61-90). London: Academic Press.
22. Driver, R., Sqires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London/New York: Routledge.
23. Eaton, J.F., Anderson, C.W., & Smith, E.L. (1984). Student preconceptions interfere with learning: Case studies of fifth-grade students. Elementary School Journal, 64, 365-379.
24. Education Market Research. (1998). Elementary and middle-school science market: Teaching methods, materials used and needed, and market size. Rockaway Park, NY: Author.
25. Feltovich, P.J., Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., & Anderson, D.K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-531). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., & Jay, E. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799-822.
27. Hammrich, P. (1997, March). Teaching for excellence: Using Project 2061 Benchmarks for more effective science instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL.
28. Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 655-675.
29. Johnstone, A.H. & Wham, A.J.B. (1982). The demands of practical work. Education in Chemistry, 19, 71-73.
30. Kesidou, S. (2001). Aligning curriculum materials with national science standards: The role of Project 2061's curriculum-materials analysis procedure in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 47-65.
31. Kesidou, S. & Roseman, J. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522-549.
32. Kesidou, S. & Roseman, J. (2003). Project 2061 analysis of middle school science textbooks: A response to Holliday. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 535-543.
33. Kulm, G. & Grier, L. (1998). Mathematics curriculum materials reliability study. Washington, DC: AAAS, Project 2061.
34. Leach, J., Driver, R., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996a). Children's ideas about ecology: 2. Ideas found in children aged 5-16 about the cycling of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 19-34.
35. Leach, J., Driver, R., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996b). Children's ideas about ecology: 3. Ideas found in children aged 5-16 about the interdependency of organisms. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 129-141.
36. Lee, O., Eichinger, D., Anderson, C.W., Berkheimer, G.D., & Blakeslee, T.D. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 249-270.
37. Lynch, S. (1999, March). Using Project 2061's curriculum analysis to evaluate educational software: Novice teachers' responses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
38. McDermott, L. (1991). Millican Lecture 1990. What we teach and what is learned - Closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301-315.
39. McNeill, K.L., Lizotte, D.J., Harris, C.J., Scott, L.A., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2003, March). Using backward design to create standards based middle school inquiry-oriented chemistry curriculum and assessment materials. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
40. National Educational Goals Panel. (1994). Data volume for the National Education Goals Report (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
41. NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. NRC. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
44. Project 2061. [Database of analytical reports on middle school curriculum materials in science.] Available: http://www.project2061.org/tools/textbook/ mgsci/INDEX.HTM
45. Renner, J.W., Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., & Marek, E.A. (1990). Understanding and misunderstandings of eighth graders of four physics concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 35-54.
46. Renner, J.W. & Marek, E.A. (1990). An educational theory base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 241-246.
47. Roseman, J. (1997). Implementing benchmarks and standards: Lessons from Project 2061. The Science Teacher, 64, 26-29.
48. Roseman, J., Kesidou, S., & Stern, L. (1996, October). Identifying curriculum materials for science literacy: A Project 2061 evaluation tool. Paper distributed at the NRC colloquium "Using standards to guide the evaluation, selection, and adaptation of instructional materials," Washington, DC. Available: www.project2061.org/newsinfo/research/roseman/ roseman1.htl
49. Roth, K. (1997). Food for plants: Student text and teacher's guide. Institute for Research on Teaching. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
50. Roth, K. (2001, February). Student-focused curriculum materials development: The case of "Food for Plants." Paper presented at the AAAS Project 2061 Science Textbook Conference, Washington, DC.
51. Roth, K. & Anderson, C. (1987). The power plant: Teacher's guide to photosynthesis (Occasional Paper No. 112). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, The Institute for Research on Teaching, College of Education.
52. Sadler, P.M. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 265-296.
53. Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., & Raizen, S. (1997). Executive summary. A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, U.S. National Research Center.
54. Schneps, M.H., & Sadler, P.M. (1988). A private universe. Program 2. Biology: Lessons pulled from thin air [videotape]. New York: Annenberg/CPB.
55. Shiland, T.W. (2003). Comment: Aiming precisely at standards that are not there: Kinetic molecular theory, scientific theories, and national standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 824-826.
56. Shulman, L. (1986). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
57. Simpson, W.D. & Marek, E.A. (1988). Understandings and misconceptions of biology concepts held by students attending small high schools and students attending large high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 361-374.
58. Smith, E. & Anderson, C. (1986, April). Alternative conceptions of matter cycling in ecosystems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
59. Smith, E.L., Blakeslee, T., & Anderson, C.W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 111-126.
60. Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J., & Anderson, D. (1994). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R.B. Ruddell & M.R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 602-616). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. (Reprinted from the tenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1988). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J., & Anderson, D. (1994). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R.B. Ruddell & M.R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 602-616). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. (Reprinted from the tenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1988). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Stavy, R. (1991). Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 305-313.
63. Stavy, R., Eisen, Y., & Yaakobi, D. (1987). How students aged 13-15 understand photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 105-115.
64. Stern, L. & Ahlgren, A. (2002). Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 889-910.
65. Stern, L. (2003). Reply: Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Fidelity to national standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 827-834.
66. Stern, L. & Roseman, J. (2001). Textbooks alignment. The Science Teacher, 68, 52-56.
67. Strike, K. & Posner, G.S. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. West & A.L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211-231). New York: Academic Press.
68. Thagard, P. (1992). Analogy, explanation, and education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 537-544.
69. Tyson, H. (1997, July). Overcoming structural barriers to good textbooks. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Education Goals Panel.
70. Tyson-Bernstein, H. (1988). America's textbook fiasco: A conspiracy of good intentions. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
71. Wandersee, J.H. (1985). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students' misconceptions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 581-597.
72. White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Palmer Press.
73. Wise, K.C. & Okey, J.R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 419-435.