Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 175-193

  Baker, M ^a   Lund, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Collaborative problem solving; Computer mediated communication; Dialogue; Reflection; Speech act theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031516256     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00019.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baker, M. (1994) A Model for Negotiation in Teaching-Learning Dialogues. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5, 2, 199-254.
2. Baker, M. & Bielaczyc, K. (1995) Missed opportunities for learning in collaborative problem-solving interactions. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (ed. J Greer) pp. 210-217. American Association for Computers in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
3. Baker, M.J. & Lund, K. (1996) Flexibly Structuring the Interaction in a CSCL Environment. In Proceedings of the EuroAIED Conference (eds. P. Brna, A. Paiva & J. Self) pp. 401-407, Ediçoes Colibri, Lisbon.
4. Baker, M.J. (1996) Argumentation et co-construction des connaissances. Interaction et Cognitions, 1, 2/3, 157-191.
5. Bental, D. & Brna, P. (1995) Enabling Abstractions: Key Steps in Building Physics Models. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (ed. J. Greer) pp. 162-169. American Association for Computers in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
6. Brown, A. (1987) Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms. In Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding (eds. F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe) pp. 65-116. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
7. Bunt, H.C. (1989) Information dialogues as communicative action in relation to partner modelling and information processing. In The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue (eds M.M. Taylor, F. Néel & D.G. Bouwhuis) pp. 47-74. Elsevier Sciences Publishers, Amsterdam.
8. Bunt, H.C. (1995) Dialogue Control Functions and Interaction Design. In Dialogue and Instruction, Modeling Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (eds. R.J. Beun, M. Baker & M. Reiner.) pp. 197-214. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
9. Chi, M.T.H. & VanLehn, K.A. (1991) The Content of Physics Self-Explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 1, 69-105.
10. Clark, H & Brennan, S. (1991) Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (eds. L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasley) pp. 127-149. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.
11. Cohen, P.R. (1984) The Pragmatics of Referring and the Modality of Communication. Computational Linguistics, 10, 2, 97-124.
12. Collins, A. & Brown, J.S. (1988) The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems (eds. H. Mandl & A. Lesgold) pp. 1-18, Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. Devi, R., Tiberghien, A, Baker, M. & Brna, P. (1996) Modelling students' construction of energy models in physics. Instructional Science, 24, 259-293.
14. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M.J., Blaye, A. & O'Malley, C. (1995) The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In Learning in Humans and Machines (eds. H. Spada & P. Reimann) pp. 189-205. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. Edmondson, W. (1981) Spoken Discourse: A model for analysis. Longman, London.
16. Good, D.A. (1989) The Viability of Conversational Grammars. In Human Factors in Information Technology 4, The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue (eds. M.M. Taylor, F. Néel, D.G. Bouwhuis) pp. 121-134. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
17. Grize, J.B. (1996) Une explication ne prouve rien. Proceedings of Explication '96: Troisiémes journées Explication, pp. 287-291. INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
18. Grosz, B.J. & Sidner, C. (1986) Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 3, 175-204.
19. Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D. & Norman, D.A. (1986). Direct Manipulation Interfaces. In User Centered System Design, New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction (eds. D.A. Norman & S.W. Draper) pp. 87-124. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ.
20. Lund, K., Baker, M.J. & Baron, M. (1996) Modelling dialogue and beliefs as a basis for generating guidance in a CSCL environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (eds. C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & A. Lesgold) pp. 206-214. Montreal.
21. Lund, K. (1997) Processus cognitifs et interactionnels dans le travail de groupe en mathématiques et physique. http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~lund/DRED/
22. Megalakaki, O. & Tiberghien, A. (1995) Corpus de dialogues de trois groupes d'élèves résolvant une séquence de problèmes mettant en jeu une activité de modélisation. COAST Research Report CR-10/95.
23. Mavarech, Z.R. & Light, P.H. (1992) Peer-based interaction at the computer: looking backward, looking forward. Learning and Instruction, 2, 3, 275-280.
24. Moeschler, J. (1985) Argumentation et Conversation. Crédif-Hatier, Paris.
25. Okamoto, T., Inaba, A. & Hasaba, Y. (1995) The Intelligent Learning Support System on the Distributed Cooperative Environment. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (ed. J. Greer) p. 588. American Association for Computers in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
26. Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M. & Teasley, S.D. (1991) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.
27. Sadock, J.M. (1994) Toward a grammatically realistic typology of speech acts. In Foundations of Speech Act Theory (ed. S.L. Tsohatzidis) pp. 393-406. Routledge, London.
28. Suchman, L. (1994) Speech Acts and Voices. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 3, 1, 85-95.
29. Tiberghien, A. (1994) Modeling as a basis for analyzing teaching-learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 4, 1, 71-87.
30. Tiberghien, A. & de Vries, E. (1997) Relating characteristics of teaching situations to learner activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 3, 163-174.
31. Webb, N.M. (1991) Task Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematical Learning in Small Groups. Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 5, 366-389.
32. Winograd, T. (1988) A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1, 3-30.