Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 708-721

  Kollar, Ingo ^a   Fischer, Frank ^a   Slotta, James D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collaboration scripts; Computer supported collaborative learning; Inquiry learning; Internal scripts; Learning environments; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 36448973042     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Andrew G., and McMullen L.M. Interpersonal scripts in the anger narratives told by clients in psychotherapy. Motivation and Emotion 24 4 (2000) 271-284
2. In: Andriessen J., Baker M., and Suthers D. (Eds). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Kluwer book series on computer supported collaborative learning (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht
3. Baker M.J. Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In: Andriessen J., Baker M.J., and Suthers D. (Eds). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht 47-78
4. Baker M., and Lund K. Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13 (1997) 175-193
5. Bell P. Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In: Hall R., Miyake N., and Enyedy N. (Eds). Proceedings of the second international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL 1997) (1997), Toronto University Press, Toronto 10-19
6. Bell P. Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. In: Linn M.C., Davis E.A., and Bell P. (Eds). Internet environments for science education (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
7. Bell P., and Linn M.C. Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education 22 8 (2000) 797-817
8. van Bruggen J.M., Kirschner P.A., and Jochems W. External representations of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction 12 1 (2002) 121-138
9. Carr C.S. Using computer supported argument visualization to teach legal argumentation. In: Kirschner P.A., Buckingham Shum S.J., and Carr C.S. (Eds). Visualizing argumentation - Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (2003), Springer, London 75-96
10. Chi M.T.H., Bassok M., Lewis M.W., Reimann P., and Glaser R. Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13 (1989) 145-182
11. Cobb P. Reasoning with tools and inscriptions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 11 (2002) 187-216
12. In: Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Ed). PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (PISA 2000. Basic competences of students in an international comparison) (2001), Leske & Budrich, Opladen
13. Dillenbourg P. Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner P.A. (Ed). Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (2002), Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen 61-91
14. Dönmez P., Rosé C., Stegmann K., Weinberger A., and Fischer F. Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. In: Koschmann T., Suthers D., and Chan T.-W. (Eds). Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 125-134
15. Driver R., Newton P., and Osbourne J. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education 84 3 (2000) 287-312
16. Ertl F., Fischer F., and Mandl H. Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education 47 3 (2006) 289-315
17. Farrar M.J., and Goodman G.S. Developmental differences in the relation between scripts and episodic memory: do they exist?. In: Fivush R., and Hudson J. (Eds). Knowing and remembering in young children (1990), Cambridge University Press, New York 30-64
18. In: Fischer F., Kollar I., Mandl H., and Haake J.M. (Eds). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (2007), Springer, New York, NY
19. Fivush R. Learning about school: the development of kindergartners' school scripts. Child Development 55 (1984) 1697-1709
20. Ginsburg G.P. Rules, scripts and prototypes in personal relationships. In: Duck S.W. (Ed). Handbook of personal relationships (1988), Wiley, Chichester 23-39
21. Howe C., Tolmie A., Duchak-Tanner V., and Rattray C. Hypothesis testing in science: group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10 4 (2000) 361-391
22. de Jong T., and Ferguson-Hessler M.G.M. Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist 31 2 (1996) 105-113
23. Kaartinen S., and Kumpulainen K. Collaborative inquiry and the construction of explanations in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction 12 2 (2002) 189-212
24. ®©: a model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist 32 4 (1997) 221-235
25. Kneser C., and Ploetzner R. Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction 11 1 (2001) 53-83
26. Kollar I., Fischer F., and Hesse F.W. Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18 2 (2006) 159-185
27. Kolodner J.L. The roles of scripts in promoting collaborative discourse in learning by design. In: Fischer F., Kollar I., Mandl H., and Haake J.M. (Eds). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (2007), Springer, New York, NY 237-262
28. Leitão S. The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development 43 (2000) 332-360
29. Linn M.C., Shear L., Bell P., and Slotta J.D. Organizing principles for science education partnerships: case studies of students' learning about "Rats in Space" and "Deformed Frogs". Educational Technology, Research, and Development 47 2 (2004) 61-84
30. Marttunen M., and Laurinen L. Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science 29 2 (2001) 127-153
31. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations using scaffolded curriculum materials and assessments. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 2004. San Diego.
32. Munneke L., van Amelsvoort M., and Andriessen J. The role of diagrams in collaborative argumentation-based learning. International Journal of Educational Research 39 (2003) 113-131
33. O'Donnell A.M. Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In: O'Donnell A.M., and King A. (Eds). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 179-196
34. O'Donnell A.M., and Dansereau D.F. Scripted cooperation in student dyads: a method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In: Hertz-Lazarowitz R., and Miller N. (Eds). Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (1992), Cambridge University Press, New York 120-141
35. Palincsar A.S., and Brown A.L. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1 (1984) 117-175
36. Pea R. The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 3 (2004) 423-451
37. Perkins D.N. Person-plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning. In: Salomon G. (Ed). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (1993), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 88-110
38. Pfister H.-R., and Mühlpfordt M. Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: the learning protocol approach. In: Stahl G. (Ed). Proceedings of the conference on computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) (2002), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 581-589
39. Pfister H.-R., Müller W., and Mühlpfordt M. Lernprotokollunterstütztes Lernen - ein Vergleich zwischen unstrukturiertem und systemkontrolliertem diskursivem Lernen im Netz (Learning-protocol supported learning - a comparison between unstructured and system-controlled discoursive learning in the web). Zeitschrift für Psychologie 211 (2003) 98-109
40. Quintana C., Reiser B.J., Davis E.A., Krajcik J., Fretz E., Duncan R.G., et al. A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 3 (2004) 337-387
41. Reiser B.J., Tabak I., Sandoval W.A., Smith B.K., Steinmuller F., and Leone A.J. BGuiLE: strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In: Carver S.M., and Klahr D. (Eds). Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (2001), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 263-305
42. Reiserer M., Ertl B., and Mandl H. Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in desktop videconferencing. Effects of content schemes and cooperation scripts in peer-teaching settings. In: Stahl G. (Ed). Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (2002), Erlbaum, Boulder, CO 379-388
43. Resnick L.B., Salmon M., Zeitz C.M., Wathen S.H., and Holowchak M. Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction 11 3&4 (1993) 347-364
44. Sandoval W.A. Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 1 (2003) 5-51
45. Savelsbergh, E., van Joolingen, E., Sins, P., deJong, T., & Lazonder, A. Co-Lab, design considerations for a collaborative discovery learning environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), April 2004. Vancouver, Canada.
46. Schank R.C. Dynamic memory revisited (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY
47. Schank R.C., and Abelson R.P. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding (1977), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
48. Slotta J.D. The web-based inquiry science environment (WISE): scaffolding teachers to adopt inquiry and technology. In: Linn M.C., Bell P., and Davis E. (Eds). Internet environments for science education (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 203-232
49. Slotta J.D., and Linn M.C. How do students make sense of Internet resources in the science classroom?. In: Jacobson M.J., and Kozma R. (Eds). Learning the sciences of the 21st century (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
50. Stein N.L., and Albro E.R. The origins and nature of arguments: studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation. Discourse Processes 32 2 (2001) 113-133
51. Strijbos J.W., Martens R.L., Jochems W.M.G., and Broers N.J. The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research 35 (2004) 195-229
52. Suthers D.D., Toth E.E., and Weiner A. An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom. In: Hall R., Miyake N., and Enyedy N. (Eds). Proceedings of the second international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (1997), University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada 272-279
53. Tabak I. Synergy: a complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 3 (2004) 305-335
54. Toulmin S. The uses of argument (1958), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
55. Weinberger A., Ertl B., Fischer F., and Mandl H. Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science 33 1 (2005) 1-30
56. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. Knowledge convergence in computer-mediated learning environments: effects of collaboration scripts. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 2004. San Diego.
57. Weinberger A., Stegmann K., and Fischer F. Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In: Koschmann T., Suthers D.D., and Chan T.-K. (Eds). Computer supported collaborative learning: The next 10 years! (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 717-726