Making authentic science accessible to students

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 923-948

  Lee, Hee Sun ^a   Songer, Nancy Butler ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; STUDENT;

EID: 0344530959     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690305023     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AHRENS, C. D. (1994) Meteorology Today (New York: West Publishing Company).
2. AULT, C. R., Jr. (1994) Research on problem solving: earth science. In D. L. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (New York: Macmillan), 269-283.
3. BARRON, B. J. S., SCHWARTZ, D. L., VYE, N. J., MOORE, A., PETROSINO, A., ZECH, L., BRANSFORD, J. D. and THE COGNITION AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP AT VANDERBILT (1998) Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271-311.
4. BELL, P. and LINN, M. C. (2000) Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.
5. BLUMENFELD, P. C., SOLOWAY, E., MARX, R. W., KRAJCIK, J. S., GUZDIAL, M. and PALINCSAR, A. (1991) Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 369-398.
6. BRANSFORD, J. D. and SCHWARTZ, D. L. (1999) Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
7. BRANSFORD, J. D., VYE, N. J., ADAMS, L. T. and PERFETTO, G. A. (1989) Learning skills and acquisition of knowledge. In A. Lesgold and R. Glaser (eds), Foundations for a psychology of education (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 199-249.
8. BRANSFORD, J. D., BROWN, A. L. and COCKING, R. R. (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
9. BROWN, J. S., COLLINS, A. and DUGUID, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
10. BROWN, A., ASH, D., RUTHERFORD, M., NAKAGAWA, K., GORDON, A. and CAMPIONE, J. C. (1993) Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed Cognition: Psychological and Educational Considerations (New York: Cambridge University Press), 188-228.
11. BYBEE, R. W. (2000) Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell and E. H. van Zee (eds), Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science), 20-46.
12. CHI, M. T. H., LEWIS, M. W., REIMANN, P. and GLASER, R. (1989) Self-explanations: how students study and examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
13. CLEMENT, J. (1991) Nonformal reasoning in experts and in science students: the use of analogies, extreme cases, and physical intuition. In J. Voss, D. Perkins and J. Segan (eds), Informal Reasoning and Education (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 345-362.
14. COGNITION AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP AT VANDERBILT (CTGV) (1992) The Jasper Series as an example of anchored instruction: theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.
15. DAVIS, E. A. and LINN, M. C. (2000) Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
16. DEBOER, G. E. (1991) A History of Ideas in Science Education (New York: Teachers College Press).
17. DEWEY, J. (1938) Experience and Education (New York: Macmillan).
18. EDELSON, D. C. (1998) Realizing authentic science learning through the adaptation of scientific practice. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (eds), International Handbook of Science Education (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 317-331.
19. EDELSON, D. C. (2001) Learning-for-use: a framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
20. EDELSON, D. C., GORDIN, D. N. and PEA, R. D. (1999) Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391-450.
21. GOLDMAN, S. R., PETROSINO, A. J., SHERWOOD, R. D., GARRISON, S., HICKEY, D., BRANSFORD, J. D. and PELLEGRINO, J. W. (1996) Anchoring science instruction in multimedia learning environments. In S. Voniadou, E. DeCorte, R. Glaser and H. Handl (eds), Interactional Perspectives on the Design of Technology-supported Learning Environments (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 257-284.
22. GREENO, J. G. (1997) On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
23. GREENO, J. G. (1998) The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
24. KARPLUS, R. (1977) Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Education, 14(2), 169-175.
25. KRAJCIK, J., BLUMENFELD, P. C., MARX, R. W., BASS, K. M. and FREDERICKS, J. (1998) Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(34), 313-350.
26. KRAJCIK, J., BLUMENFELD, P. C., MARX, R. and SOLOWAY, E. (2000) Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell and E. H. van Zee (eds), Inquiring into inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science), 283-315.
27. KUHN, D. (1989) Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689.
28. KUHN, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
29. LAVE, J. and WENGER, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
30. LEWIS, E. L. and LINN, M. C. (1994) Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657-677.
31. LINN, M. C. (1982) Theoretical and practical significance of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(9), 727-742.
32. LINN, M. C. and MUILENBURG, L. (1996) Creating lifelong science learners: what models from a firm foundation? Educational Researcher, 25(5), 18-24.
33. LINN, M. C. and SONGER, N. B. (1991) Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: what are appropriate cognitive demands? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 885-918.
34. LOWE, R. (1988) 'Reading' scientific diagrams: characterising components of skilled performance. Research in Science Education, 18, 112-122.
35. LOWE, R. K. (1993) Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram. Learning and Instruction, 3, 157-179.
36. LOWE, R. K. (1996) Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11(4), 377-397.
37. MILLAR, R. and DRIVER, R. (1987) Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-62.
38. MOKROS, J. R. and TINKER, R. F. (1987) The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 369-383.
39. NACHMIAS, R. and LINN, M. C. (1987) Evaluations of science laboratory data: the role of computer-presented information. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 491-506.
40. NRC (NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL) (1996) National Science Education Standards (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
41. NRC (NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL) (2000) Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
42. PALINCSAR, A. S. and BROWN, A. L. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
43. PEA, R. D. (1994) Seeing what we build together: distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285-299.
44. PERKINS, D. N. and SALOMON, G. (1989) Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25.
45. SCARDAMALIA, M. and BEREITER, C. (1991) Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
46. SCARDAMALIA, M. and BEREITER, C. (1994) Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
47. SCHWAB, J. J. (1962) The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab and P. F. Brandwein (eds), The Teaching of Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 3-103.
48. SONGER, N. B. (1996) Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms: a case of kids as global scientists. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(4), 297-327.
49. SONGER, N. B. (1998) Can technology bring students closer to science? In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (eds), International Handbook of Science Education (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 333-348.
50. SONGER, N. B., LEE, H.-S. and KAM, R. (2002) Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: what are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128-150.
51. SONGER, N. B., and SAMSON, P. J. (2000) Internet-enabled multimedia that supports inquiry understandings in middle school digital learning environments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Seattle, WA).
52. SPITULNIK, M. W., STRATFORD, S., KRAJCIK, J. and SOLOWAY, E. (1998) Using technology to support students' artifact construction in science. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (eds), International Handbook of Science Education (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 363-381.
53. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
54. WHITE, B. Y. (1993) ThinkerTools: causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1-100.
55. WHITE, B. Y. and FREDERIKSEN, J. R. (1998) Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
56. WHITE, B. Y. and FREDERIKSEN, J. R. (2000) Metacognitive facilitation: an approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In J. Minstrell and E. H. van Zee (eds), Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science), 331-370.