Scaffolding analysis: Extending the scaffolding metaphor to learning artifacts

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 387-421

  Sherin, Bruce ^a   Reiser, Brian J ^a   Edelson, Daniel ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043070685     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Beckwith, E. K., & Nelson, C. (1998). The ChemViz Project: Using a supercomputer to illustrate abstract concepts in chemistry. Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(6), 17-19.
2. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the Web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797-817.
3. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10, 333-356.
4. Buller, D. J. (1999). Function, selection, and design. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Cummins, R. (1999). Functions. In D. J. Buller (Ed.), Function, selection, and design (pp. 57-83). Albany: State University of New York Press.
7. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819-837.
8. diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. diSessa, A. A., Abelson, H., & Ploger, D. (1991). An overview of Boxer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(1), 3-15.
10. Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-Use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 355-385.
11. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391-450.
12. Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117-138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Guzdial, M. (1994). Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 1-44.
14. Guzdial, M. (1998). Technological support for project-based learning. ASCD Yearbook, 4(1), 47-71.
15. Hall, R., Kibler, D., Wenger, E., & Truxaw, C. (1989). Exploring the episodic structure of algebra story problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 223-283.
16. Hickey, D. T., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., & Christie, M. A. (1999). Advancing educational theory by enhancing practice in a technology-supported genetics learning environment. Journal of Education, 181, 25-55.
17. Jackiw, N. (2001). The Geometer's Sketchpad™ (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. Emeryville, CA: KCP Technologies, Inc.
18. Jackson, S. L., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. In ACM CHI '98 (pp. 187-194). New York: Addison-Wesley.
19. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In A. A. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J. L. Kolodner, & A. Ram (Eds.), International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1998 (pp. 16-22). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
20. Krajcik, J., Soloway, E., & Blumenfeld, P. (1998). Scaffolded technology tools to promote teaching and learning in science. ASCD Yearbook, 1998, 31-45.
21. Laborde, C., & Laborde, J. M. (1995). The case of Cabri-géomètre: Learning geometry in a computer-based environment. In D. Watson & D. Tinsley (Eds.), Integrating information technology into education (pp. 95-106). London: Chapman & Hall.
22. Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 781-796.
23. Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.
24. Papert, S. (1980), Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
25. Reiser, B., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Repenning, A. (1993). AgentSheets: A tool for building domain-oriented dynamic, visual environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder.
27. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 95-116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5-51.
30. Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 169-183). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Stone, C. A. (1998a). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364.
32. Stone, C. A. (1998b). Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 409-413.
33. Tabak, I., Smith, B. K., Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (1996). Combining general and domain-specific strategic support for biological inquiry. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Intelli gent tutoring systems: Third International Conference, ITS '96 (pp. 288-296). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Springer-Verlag.
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 171-202.
38. Williams, S. M., Burgess, K. L., & Bray, M. H. (1998). Technology and learning in Schools for Thought classrooms. ASCD Yearbook, 1998, 97-119.
39. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89-100.
40. Wright, L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review, 82, 139-168.