Dialogue, argumentation and education: History, theory and practice

Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-293

  Schwarz, Baruch B ^a   Baker, Michael J ^b   Resnick, Lauren B ^c   Schantz, Faith ^c  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969240605     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781316493960     Document Type: Book

References (540)

1. Andriessen, J. & Coirier, P. (1999). Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing. University of Amsterdam Press.
2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M. J. & Suthers, D. (Eds.) (2003). Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Baker, M. J., Andriessen, J. & Järvelä, S. (Eds.) (2013). Affective Learning Together:Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning (New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction Series). London: Routledge.
4. Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education. Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research Series: Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_5
5. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2014). Argue with me: Developing thinking and writing through dialog. Bronxville, NY: Wessex Press.
7. Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I. & Säljö, R. (Eds.) (2010). Learning Across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices (New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction Series). London: Routledge.
8. Muller Mirza, N. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Eds.) (2009). Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices. New York: Springer.
9. Schwarz, B. B., Dreyfus, T. & Hershkowitz, R. (Eds.) (2009). Transformation of Knowledge through Classroom Interaction (New Perspectives in Learning and Instruction Series). London: Routledge.
10. Abu-Zayd, N. H. (2008). ‘Trial of thought: modern inquisition in Egypt’. In W. B. Drees and P. S. van Koningsveld (eds.), The Study of Religion and the Training of Muslim Clergy in Europe: Academic and Religious Freedom in the 21st Century (pp. 153-73). Leiden University Press. With an Appendix by Mona Zulficar, ‘My testimony on the case of Abu Zayd’ (pp. 174-8).
11. Aikins, J. W., Bierman, K. L. & Parker, J. G. (2005). Navigating the transition to junior high school: the influence of pre-transition friendship and self-system characteristics’. Social Development, 14(1), 42-60.
12. Al-Alwâni, T. J. (1986/1995). Islam: Conflit d’opinions. Pour une éthique du désaccord(trans. from the 3rd edn. of Adab al-ikhtilâl fî al-islâm [1986] by I. Benmahdjoub and M. Messaoudi). Paris: Al-Qalam.
13. Alexander, R. J. (2001). Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
14. Alexander, R. J. (2005). Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. London:Dialogos.
15. Allen, A. (2002). ‘Power, subjectivity, and agency: between Arendt and Foucault’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 10(2), 131-49.
16. Amigues, R. (1988). ‘Peer interaction in solving physics problems: socio-cognitive confrontation and metacognitive aspects’. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 141-58.
17. Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Waggoner, M. & Nguyen, K. (1998). ‘Intellectually stimulating story discussions’. In J. Osborn and F. Lehr (eds.), Literacy for All(pp. 170-86). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Andriessen, J. (2006). ‘Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computersupported collaborative learning environments’. In R. K. Sawyer (ed.), The Learning Sciences (pp. 443-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Andriessen, J. & Baker, M. J. (2015). ‘Arguing to learn’. In R. K. Sawyer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd edn., pp. 439-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Andriessen, J. & Coirier, P. (eds.). (1999). Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
21. Andriessen, J. & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). ‘Argumentative design’. In N. Muller-Mirza and A.-N. Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices (pp. 145-174). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. Andriessen, J., Baker, M. J. & Suthers, D. (eds.). (2003). Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
23. Andriessen, J., Baker, M. J. & van der Puil., C. (2011). ‘Socio-cognitive tension in collaborative working relations’. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (eds.), Learning Across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices(New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction Series) (pp. 222-42). London:Routledge.
24. Applebee, A. N. (1996). Curriculum as Conversation: Transforming Traditions of Teaching and Learning. University of Chicago Press.
25. Arendt, H. (1954/2006). ‘The crisis of education’. In H. Arendt, Between Past and Future. London: Penguin.
26. Arendt, H. (1998/1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
27. Arzarello, F. (2008). ‘The proof in the 20th century’. In P. Boero (ed.), Theorems in Schools: From History, Epistemology and Cognition to Classroom Practices(pp. 43-64). Rotterdam: Sense.
28. Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D. & Robutti, O. (2008). ‘The transition to formal proof in geometry’. In P. Boero (ed.), Theorems in Schools: From History, Epistemology and Cognition to Classroom Practices (pp. 307-424). Rotterdam:Sense.
29. Asterhan, C. S. C. (2012). ‘Facilitating classroom argumentation with computer technology’. In R. Gillies (ed.), Pedagogies: New Developments in the Learning Sciences (pp. 105-29). New York: Nova Science.
30. Asterhan, C. S. C. (2013). ‘Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation: conceptualization and quantitative assessment’. In M. Baker, J. Andriessen & S. Jarvela (eds.), Affective Learning Together (pp. 251-72). London: Routledge.
31. Asterhan, C. S. C. (2015). ‘Introducing online dialogues in collocated classrooms: if, why and how’. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan & S. Clarke (eds.), Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue (pp. 205-18). Washington, DC: AERA.
32. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Babichenko, M. (2015). ‘The social dimension of learning through argumentation: effects of human presence and discourse style’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 740-55.
33. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Eisenmann, T. (2011). ‘Introducing synchronous e-discussions in co-located classrooms: a study on the experiences of “active” and “silent” secondary school students’. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2169-77.
34. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Rosenberg, H. (2015). ‘The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher student interactions in Facebook: the teacher perspective’. Computers & Education, 85, 134-48.
35. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). ‘The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626-39.
36. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2009a). ‘Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue’. Cognitive Science, 33, 374-400.
37. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2009b). ‘Transformation of robust misconceptions through peer argumentation’. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus & R. Hershkowitz (eds.), Guided Transformation of Knowledge in Classrooms (pp. 159-72). London: Routledge.
38. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2010). ‘Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 259-82.
39. Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). ‘Argumentation for learning: well-trodden paths and unexplored territories’. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164-87.
40. Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B. & Butler, R. (2009). ‘Inhibitors and facilitators of peer interaction that supports conceptual learning: the role achievement goal orientations’. In N. A. Taatgen and H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahaw, NJ:Erlbaum.
41. Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B. & Cohen-Eliyahu, N. (2014). ‘Outcome feedback during collaborative learning: contingencies between feedback and dyad composition’. Learning & Instruction, 34(4), 1-10.
42. Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B. & Gil, J. (2012). ‘Guiding computer-mediated discussions in the classroom: epistemic and interactional human guidance for small-group argumentation’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 375-97.
43. Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J.M. (1997). Observing Interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Baker, M. J. (2003). ‘Computer-mediated interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions’. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
45. Baker, M. J. (1999a). ‘Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge’. In N.M. Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (eds.) Argumentation and Education:Theoretical Foundations and Practices (pp. 127-44). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
46. Baker, M. J. (1999b). ‘Intersubjective and intrasubjective rationalities in pedagogical debates’. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus & R. Hershkowitz (eds.), Transformation of Knowledge Through Classroom Interaction (New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction) (pp. 145-58). London: Routledge.
47. Baker, M. J. (1999c). ‘Argumentation and constructive interaction’. In P. Coirier and J. Andriessen (eds.), Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing (pp. 179-202). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
48. Baker, M. J. (2002). ‘Forms of cooperation in dyadic problem-solving’. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 16(4-5), 587-620.
49. Baker, M. J. (2015). ‘The integration of pragma-dialectics and collaborative learning research:dialogue, externalisation and collective thinking’. In F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (eds.), Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp. 175-99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Baker, M. J. & Lund, K. (1997). ‘Promoting reflective interactions in a computersupported collaborative learning environment’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 13, 175-93.
51. Baker, M. J. & Séjourné, A. (2007). ‘L’élaboration de connaissances chez les élèves dans un débat médiatisé par ordinateur’. In A. Specogna (ed.), Enseigner dans l’interaction (pp. 81-111). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
52. Baker, M. J., Andriessen J. E. B. & Järvelä, S. (2013). Affective Learning Together: Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning. London: Routledge.
53. Baker, M. J., Bernard, F. X. & Dumez-Féroc, I. (2012). ‘Integrating computersupported collaborative learning into the classroom: the anatomy of a failure’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 161-76.
54. Baker, M. J., Hansen, T., Joiner, R. & Traum, D. (1998). ‘Grounding’ for Intersubjectivity and Learning (Rep. No. CR-15/98). Lyon, France: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
55. Baker, M. J., Hansen, T., Joiner, R. & Traum, D. (1999a). ‘The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks’. In P. Dillenbourg (ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches(pp. 31-63). Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
56. Baker, M. J., Quignard, M., Lund, K. & Séjourné, A. (2003). ‘Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate’. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments:Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp. 11-20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
57. Baker, M. J., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M. & Quignard, M. (2007). ‘Rainbow: a framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 315-57.
58. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
59. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. C. Emerson and M.Holquist, trans. V. W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
60. Bakhtine, M. (1929/1977). Le Marxisme et la Philosophie du Langage [Marxism and Philosophy of Language] (1st edn., Voloshinov, Leningrad, 1929). Paris:Minuit.
61. Balacheff, N. (1991) ‘The benefits and limits of social interaction: the case of mathematical proof’. In A. Bishop, S. Mellin-Olson & J. van Doormolen (eds.), Mathematics Knowledge: Its Growth through Teaching (pp. 173-92). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
62. Bar-On, D. (2010). ‘Storytelling and multiple narratives in conflict situations: from the TRT Group in the German-Jewish context to the dual-narrative approach of PRIME’. In G. Salomon & E. Cairns (eds.), Handbook on Peace Education(pp. 199-212). New York: Psychology Press.
63. Barnes, D. (1976). From Communication to Curriculum. Harmondsworth, UK:Penguin Education.
64. Barnes, D. (2008). ‘Exploratory talk for learning’. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (eds.), Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes. (pp. 1-17). London: Sage.
65. Barnlund, D. C. (1975). Public and Private Self in Japan and the United States:Communicative Styles of Two Cultures. Tokyo: Simul.
66. Barron, B. J. S. (2000). ‘Achieving coordination in collaborative problem solving groups’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403-36.
67. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., et al. (1998). ‘Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem and projectbased learning’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271-311.
68. Barth, E. M. & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logic and Argumentation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
69. Bartolini-Bussi, M., Boero, P., Ferri, F., Garuti, R. & Mariotti, M. A. (1997). ‘Approaching geometry theorems in context’. In E. Pehkonen (ed.), Proceedings of 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 180-95). Lahti: University of Helsinki.
70. Barzilai, S. & Zohar, A. (2012). ‘Epistemic thinking in action: evaluating and integrating online sources’. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39-85.
71. Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M. & Dorph, R. (2015). ‘The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation’. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590-1612.
72. Battistoni, R. M. & Hudson, W. E. (eds.). (1997). Experiencing Citizenship: Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Political Science. Washington: American Association for Higher Education.
73. Bauman, Z. (1988). ‘Strangers: the social construction of universality and particularity’. Telos, 78, 7-42.
74. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M. V., Goldberger, N. R. & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books.
75. Bell, P. (1997). ‘Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups’. In R. Hall, N. Miyake & N. Enyedy (eds.), Proceedings of CSCL’97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 10-19). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
76. Bell, P. & Linn, M. C. (2000). ‘Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE’. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.
77. Berkeley. (1715/2006). Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. London: Longman.
78. Berland, L. K. & Hammer, D. (2012). ‘Framing for scientific argumentation’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 68-94.
79. Berland, L. K. & Lee, V. R. (2012). ‘Pursuit of consensus: disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation’. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12). DOI:10.1080/09500693.2011.645086.
80. Berland, L. K. & Reiser, B. J. (2011). ‘Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation’. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216.
81. Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond Learning. Democratic Education for a Human Future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
82. Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). The Beautiful Risk of Education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
83. Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press.
84. Blattberg, C. (2003). ‘Patriotic, not deliberative, democracy’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6(1), 155-74.
85. Blau, I. & Caspi, A. (2008). ‘Do media richness and visual anonymity influence learning? A comparative study using Skype. In Y. Eshet, A. Caspi & N. Geri (eds.), Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 18-24). Ra’anana, Israel: Open University of Israel.
86. Blaye, A. (1990). ‘Peer interaction in solving a binary matrix problem: possible mechanisms causing individual progress’. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett & H. F. Friedrich (eds.), Learning and Instruction, Vol. 2. London:Pergamon.
87. Bloch, M. (1914/1995). ‘Critique historique et critique du temoignage’. In M. Bloch, Histoire et Historiens: Texts Gathered by Etienne Bloch (pp. 8-16). Paris:Armand Colin.
88. Bloch, M. (1941). Apologie pour l’histoire ou Métier d’historien. Paris: Armand Colin.
89. Blondheim, M. & Blum-Kulka, S. (2001). ‘Literacy, orality, television: mediation and authenticity in Jewish conversational arguing, 1-2000 CE’. Communication Review, 4, 511-40.
90. Boero, P., Garuti, R. & Lemut, E. (2007). ‘Approaching theorems in grade VIII:some mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures, and conditions suitable to enhance them’. In P. Boero (ed.), Theorems in schools: From History, Epistemology and Cognition to Classroom Practices(pp. 251-66). Rotterdam: Sense.
91. Bouchard, R. (1988). ‘La conversation-palimpseste’. In J. Cosnier, N. Gelas & C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni (eds.), Échanges sur la conversation (pp. 105-21). Paris:CNRS.
92. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Langage et pouvoir symbolique. [Language and Symbolic Power]. Paris: Points Essais.
93. Bowen, J. (1981). A History of Western Education, Vol. 3: The Modern West. New York: St. Martin’s.
94. Brem, S. & Rips, L. (2000). ‘Explanation and evidence in informal argument’. Cognitive Science, 24, 573-604.
95. Brennan, S. E. & Lockridge, C. B. (2006). ‘Computer-mediated communication:a cognitive science approach’. In K. Brown (ed.), ELL 2, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edn., pp. 775-80). Oxford: Elsevier.
96. Brennan, S. E., Galati, A. & Kuhlen, A. K. (2010). ‘Two minds, one dialog: coordinating speaking and understanding’. In B. H. Ross (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 53 (pp. 301-44). New York: Academic Press.
97. Breuer, M. (2003). The Tents of Torah: The Yeshiva, Its Structure and History. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History.
98. Britt, M. & Aglinskas, C. (2002). ‘Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information’. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485-522.
99. Buber, M. (1923). Ich und Du. Leipzig: Insel-Verlag.
100. Burbules, N. (1993). Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. New York:Teachers College Press.
101. Burbules, N. & Rice (1991). ‘Dialogue across differences: continuing the conversation’. Harvard Educational Review, 61(4), 393-416.
102. Butera, F. & Mugny, G. (1995). ‘Conflict between incompetencies and influence of a low-expertise source in hypothesis testing’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457-62.
103. Butler, R. (2000). ‘What learners want to know: the role of achievement goals in shaping seeking, learning and interest’. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance (pp. 11-194). San Diego: Academic Press.
104. Buty, C. & Plantin, C. (2008). Argumenter en classe de sciences: Du débat à l’apprentissage [Arguing in the Science Classroom: From Debate to Learning]. Lyon: INRP.
105. Cameron, D. (1998). ‘Language, gender and discourse: a review’. Signs: Journal of Women, Culture and Society, 23(4), 945-73.
106. Carmien, S., Kollar, I., Fischer, G. & Fischer, F. (2007). ‘The interplay of internal and external scripts: a distributed cognition perspective’. In F. Fischer, I, Kollar, H., Mandl & J. Haake (eds.), Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge: Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives(pp. 303-26). New York: Springer.
107. Carnevale, P. J. & Probst, T. (1998). ‘Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1300-9.
108. Carugati, F. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). ‘Learning and instruction: socialcognitive perspectives’. In James D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn., Vol. 13, pp. 670-6). Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
109. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning (2nd edn.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
110. Cazden, C., Bond, J. T., Epstein, A. S., Matz, R. D. & Savignon, S. J. (1977). ‘Language assessment: where, what and how’. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 8: 83-91.
111. Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M. & Lavancher, C. (1994). ‘Eliciting selfexplanations improves understanding’. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-77.
112. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D. & de Leeuw, N. (1994). ‘From things to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts’. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
113. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T. & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). ‘Learning from tutoring’. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
114. Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2010). ‘Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: case studies in science classrooms’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230-84.
115. Chinn, C. A. & Brewer, W. F. (1998). ‘An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-54.
116. Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C. & Waggoner, M. A. (2001). ‘Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion’. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378-411.
117. Chinn, C. A., O’Donnell, A. M. & Jinks, T. S. (2000). ‘The structure of discourse in collaborative learning’. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77-97.
118. Chiu, M. M. (2004). ‘Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: how to improve student problem solving and time ontask’. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 365-99.
119. Clark, D. B. & Sampson, V. (2008). ‘Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 293-321.
120. Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A. & Erkens, G. (2007). ‘Analytical frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments’. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 343-74.
121. Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). ‘Grounding in communication’. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 127-49). Washington, DC: APA.
122. Clark, H. H. & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). ‘Contributing to discourse’. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-94.
123. Clarke, S. (2015). ‘The right to speak’. In L. B. Resnick, S. C. S. Asterhan & S. Clarke (eds.), Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue(pp. 167-80). Washington, DC: AERA.
124. Cobb, P. & Bauersfeld, H. (eds.). (1995). The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning:interaction in Classroom Cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K. & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). ‘Participating in classroom mathematical practices’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1-2), 113-64.
126. Cohen, J. (1998). ‘Democracy and liberty’. In J. Ellster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy(pp. 185-231). Cambridge University Press.
127. Cohen, L. J. (1992). An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
128. Cohen-Elyahu, N. (2011). ‘Dyadic interactions and Conceptual Change: The case of Proportional Reasoning’. PhD thesis. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
129. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
130. Coleman, E. B. (1998). ‘Using explanatory knowledge during problem solving in science’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 387-427.
131. Coleman, J. S. (1988). ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), S95-120.
132. Condorcet, J.-A.-N. (1955/1795). Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind, trans. June Barraclough. New York: Noonday Press.
133. Copleston, F. (1950). A History of Philosophy, Vol. II: Medieval Philosophy. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
134. Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the Black Box of Classroom Practice: Change without Reform in American Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
135. Darnon, C. & Butera, F. (2007). ‘Learning or succeeding? Conflict regulation with mastery or performance goals’. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 145-52.
136. Darnon, C., Butera, F. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). ‘Achievement goals in social interactions: learning within mastery vs. performance goals’. Motivation & Emotion, 31, 61-70.
137. Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S. M., Panuzzo, N. & Butera, F. (2006). ‘Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 766-76.
138. de Vries, E., Lund, K. & Baker, M. (2002). ‘Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue:explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 63-103.
139. Derrida, J. (1982). ‘Difference’. In Margins of Philosophy (pp. 1-17). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
140. Dewey, J. (1910). Democracy and Education. New York: Prometheus Books.
141. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
142. Dewey, J. (1938) Experience and Education. New York: Collier/Macmillan.
143. Diderot, D. (1769). D’Alembert’s Dream. Trans. by I. C. Johnston. Available online at: http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key= olbp15890.
144. Dieudonné, J. (1989). A History of Algebraic and Differential Topology 1900-1960. Basel: Birkhaüser.
145. Dillenbourg, P. (ed.). (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier.
146. Dillenbourg, P. (ed.). (2002). ‘Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design’. In P. A. Kirschner (ed.), Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
147. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A. & O’Malley, C. (1996). ‘The evolution of research on collaborative learning’. In E. Spada & P. Reimann (eds.), Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science(pp. 189-211). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
148. DiSessa, A. (1988). ‘Knowledge in pieces’. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (eds.), Constructivism in the Computer Age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
149. DiSessa, A., Gillespie, N. M. & Esterly, J. B. (2004). ‘Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force’. Cognitive Science, 28, 843-900.
150. Doise, W. & Mugny, G. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellect. Oxford:Pergamon.
151. Doise, W., Mugny, G. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1975). ‘Social interaction and the development of logical operations’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 367-83.
152. Dominicy, M. (2015). Perelman et l’école de Bruxelles [Perelman and the Brussels School]. Available online at: http://digitheque.ulb.ac.be/fileadmin/user_ upload/Web_Bibliotheques/images/bibliotheques/BECS/Perelman/Marc_Dominicy_Article_Perelman.pdf.
153. Doosje, B. & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). ‘Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-48.
154. Douek, N. (1999). ‘Argumentation and conceptualisation in context: a case study on sun shadows in primary school’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 89-110.
155. Douek, N. (2008) ‘Some remarks about argumentation and proof’. In P. Boero (ed.), Theorems in Schools: From History, Epistemology and Cognition to Classroom Practices. Rotterdam: Sense.
156. Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). ‘Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms’. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
157. Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. S. & Tanguay, D. (2012). ‘Argumentation and proof in the mathematics classroom’. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (eds.), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (New ICMI Study Series 15, pp. 349-67). New York: Springer Science.
158. Duschl, R. & Osborne, J. (2002). ‘Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education’. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
159. Duval, R. (1998). ‘Geometry from a cognitive point of view’. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (eds.), Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century:An ICMI Study (pp. 37-62). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
160. Dweck, C. (1986) ‘Motivational processes affecting learning’. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-8.
161. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
162. Ellsworth. E. (1989). ‘Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy’. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-325.
163. Engle, R. A. & Conant, F. R. (2002). ‘Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom’, Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
164. Ennis, R. H. (1989). ‘Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research’. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
165. Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education(Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research Series). New York:Springer.
166. Erduran, S., Osborne, J. F. & Simon, S. (2004). ‘Enhancing the quality of argument in school science’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
167. Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
168. Felton, M. & Kuhn, D. (2001). ‘The development of argumentative discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32, 135-53.
169. Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M. & Gilabert, S. (2009). ‘Deliberation versus dispute:the impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom’. Informal Logic, 29, 417-46.
170. Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. & Rojas-Drummond, S. M. (2002). ‘Reconceptualising “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning’. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36, 40-54.
171. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
172. Fischbein, E. & Kedem, I. (1982). ‘Proof and certitude in the development of mathematical thinking’. In A. Vermandel (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education(pp. 128-31). Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen.
173. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H. & Haake, J. (eds.). (2007). Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge: Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives. New York: Springer.
174. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K. & Wecker, C. (2013). ‘Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning’. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56-66.
175. Fishkin, J. S. & Luskin, R. C. (2005). ‘Experimenting with a democratic ideal:deliberative polling and public opinion’. Acta Politica, 40(3), 284-98.
176. Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing Teacher Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
177. Ford, M. J. (2008). ‘Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning’. Science Education, 92, 404-23.
178. Ford, M. J. (2012). ‘A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning’. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207-45.
179. Foucault, M. (1972). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon Books.
180. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
181. Friedman, M. (1988). '“For the miracles”: the prosperity of the Torah world (Yeshivot and Kollels) in Israel’. In I. Etkes (ed.), Yeshivot and Battei Midrash(pp. 431-42). Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History.
182. Frijters, S., ten Dam, G. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2008). ‘Effects of dialogic learning on value-loaded critical thinking’. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 66-82.
183. Funkenstein, A. (1989). ‘Collective memory and historical consciousness’. History & Memory 1(1). 5-26.
184. Gadamer, H.-G. (1971/1995). Langage et vérité [Language and Truth]. Paris:Gallimard.
185. Galston, W. (1995). ‘Liberal virtues and the formation of civic character’. In M. A. Glendon & D. Blankenhorn (eds.), Seedbeds of Virtue. New York: Madison Books.
186. Galston, W. (1998). ‘Civic education in the liberal state’. In A. Oxenberg Rorty (ed.), Philosophers on Education (pp. 470-80). London: Routledge.
187. Galton, M., Simon, B. & Croll, P. (1980). Inside the Primary School (the ORACLE Project). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
188. Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Wall. D. & Pell, A. (1999). Inside the Primary Classroom: 20 Years On. London: Routledge.
189. Garcia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S. & Felton, M. (2013). ‘The effect of argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse’. Science Education, 97(4), 497-523.
190. Garuti, R., Boero, P. & Lemut, E. (1998). ‘Cognitive unity of theorems and difficulties of proof’. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (eds.), Proceedings of 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2 (pp. 345-52). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Stellenbosch University Press.
191. Garuti, R., Boero, P., Lemut, E. & Mariotti, M. A. (1996). ‘Challenging the traditional school approach to theorems: a hypothesis about the cognitive unity of theorems’. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (eds.), Proceedings of 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol. 2, pp. 113-20). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia Press.
192. Gilbert, N. & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
193. Gillies, R. M. (2004). ‘The effects of communication training on teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning’. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 257-79.
194. Gillies, R. M. (2009). Evidence-Based Teaching: Strategies That Promote Learning. Rotterdam:Sense.
195. Ginzburg, C. (1999). History, Rhetoric and Proof. Boston: University Press of New England.
196. Giroux, H. (2008). Against the Terror of Neoliberalism: Beyond the Politics of Greed. Boulder, CO.: Paradigm Publishers, University of British Columbia Press.
197. Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey Press.
198. Giroux, H. (1994). ‘Border pedagogy and the politics of postmodernism’. In P. McLaren (ed.), Postmodernism, Post-colonialism and Pedagogy (pp. 37-64). Albert Park, Victoria, Australia: James Nicholas.
199. Glachan, M. & Light, P. (1982). ‘Peer interaction and learning: can two wrongs make a right?’ In G. Butterworth & P. Light (eds.), Social Cognition: Studies in the Development of Understanding (pp. 238-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
200. Glassner, A. & Schwarz, B. B. (2014). ‘Learning argumentation practices in school with a graphical synchronous discussion tool’. In L. Shedletsky (ed.), Cases on Teaching Critical Thinking through Visual Representation Strategies(pp. 418-45).
201. Glassner, A. & Schwarz, B. B. (2005). ‘The antilogos ability to evaluate information supporting arguments’. Learning and Instruction, 15, 353-75.
202. Godsay, S., Henderson, W., Levine, P. & Littenberg-Tobias, J. (2012). State Civic Education Requirements, Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
203. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Doubleday.
204. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
205. Golanics, J. D. & Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). ‘Enhancing collaborative online argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructions’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 167-80.
206. Goldberg, T. (2013). '“It’s in my veins”: identity and disciplinary practice in students’ discussions of a historical issue’. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 33-64.
207. Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B. & Porat, D. (2008). ‘Living and dormant collective memories as contexts of history learning’. Learning & Instruction, 18(3), 223-37.
208. Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B. & Porat, D. (2011). ‘Changes in narrative and argumentative writing by students discussing “hot” historical issues’. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 185-217.
209. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A. & Manning, F. (2013). ‘Research and development of multiple source comprehension assessment’. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman & J. F. Rouet (eds.). Reading - From Words to Multiple Texts (pp. 180-99). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
210. Greeno, J. G., Benke, G., Engle, R. A., Lachapelle, C. & Wiebe, M. (1998). ‘Considering conceptual growth as change in discourse practices’. In M. A. Gernsbacher and S. J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 442-7). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
211. Gregg, M. & Leinhardt, G. (2002). ‘Learning from the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute: documenting teacher development’. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 553-87.
212. Grize, J.-B. (1982). De la logique à l’argumentation [From Logic to Argumentation]. Geneva: Librairie Droz.
213. Grize, J.-B. (1996). Logique naturelle et communications. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
214. Guerrini, J.-C. & Majcherczak, E. (1999). L’argumentation au pluriel: polyphonie, valeurs, points de vue [Argumentation in the Plural: Polyphony, Values and Viewpoints]. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
215. Guiller, J., Ross, A. & Durndell, A. (2008). ‘Peer interaction and critical thinking:face-to-face or online discussion?’ Learning and Instruction, 18, 187-200.
216. Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
217. Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2002). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
218. Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
219. Habermas, J. (1984-1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols. Boston: Beacon Press.
220. Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. F. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
221. Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
222. Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R. & Schwarz, B. B (2000). ‘The role of surprise and uncertainty in promoting the need to prove in computerized environments’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1&2), 127-50.
223. Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R. & Schwarz, B. B (2002). ‘Between task design and students’ explanations in geometrical activities’. Canadian Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2, 529-52.
224. Halbwachs, M. (1925/1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (originally published in Les Travaux de L’Année Sociologique. Paris:F. Alcan, 1925).
225. Halldén, O. (1994). ‘On the paradox of understanding history in an educational setting’. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck & C. Stainton (eds.), Teaching and Learning in History (pp. 27-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
226. Halmos, P. R. (1985). I Want to Be a Mathematician - An Automathography in Three Parts. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
227. Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
228. Hamburger, Y. A. & Ben Artzi, E. (2000). ‘The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet’. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441-9.
229. Hamesse, J. (1999). ‘The scholastic model of reading’. In G. Cavallo & R. Chartier (eds.), A History of Reading in the West (pp. 103-19). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
230. Hanna, G. (1995). ‘Challenges to the importance of proof’. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15, 42-50.
231. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2002). ‘Revision of achievement goal theory: necessary and illuminating’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562-75.
232. Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
233. Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1991). ‘Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity’. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 331-48). Washington, DC: APA.
234. Hedge, L. (1830). Elements of Logick; or, a Summary of the General Principles and Different Modes of Reasoning. Buffalo, NY: Phinney and Company.
235. Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson (1962). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
236. Henningsen, M. & Stein, M. K. (1997). ‘Mathematical tasks and student cognition:classroom-based factors that support or inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning’. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-49.
237. Herrenkohl, L. R. & Guerra, M. R. (1998). ‘Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade’. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431-73.
238. Herring, S. C. (2004). ‘Computer-mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching online behavior’. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling & J. H. Gray (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338-76). New York: Cambridge University Press.
239. Herring, S. C. (2011). ‘Computer-mediated conversation: introduction and overview’. Language@ Internet 8; available at: www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Herring.
240. Hershkowitz, R. (1990). ‘Psychological aspects of learning geometry’. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (eds.), Mathematics and Cognition (pp. 70-95). Cambridge University Press.
241. Hess, D. & Avery, P. (2008). ‘Discussion of controversial issues as a form and goal of democratic education’. In J. Arthur, I. Davis and C. Hahn (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy (pp. 506-18). London:Sage.
242. Hicks, S. R. C. (2004). Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Tempe, AZ: Scholargy Press.
243. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., et al. (1996). ‘Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: the case of mathematics’. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12-21.
244. Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M. & Vedder, P. (2007). ‘Exploring the links between students’ engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom’.
245. Hofer, B. K. (2004). ‘Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process:thinking aloud during online searching’. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43-55.
246. Hofstede, G. (2011). ‘Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context’. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1); availavle online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
247. Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M. & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). ‘Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 791-806.
248. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K. & Pressley, M. (1999). ‘Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions’. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379-432.
249. Horton, M. (1998). The Long Haul: An Autobiography. New York: Teachers College Press.
250. Howe, C. (2009). ‘Collaborative group work in middle childhood: joint construction, unresolved contradiction and the growth of knowledge’. Human Development, 52(4), 215-39.
251. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V. & Rattray, C. (2000). ‘Hypothesis testing in science: group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge’. Learning and Instruction, 10, 361-91.
252. Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Cress, U. & Giovis, C. (2000). ‘Implicit and explicit dialogue structuring in virtual learning groups’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 53-64.
253. Hynd, C. & Alvermann, D. E. (1986). ‘The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts’. Journal of Reading, 29(5), 440-6.
254. Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos J. P. & Simpson, A. (2007) ‘Modeling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3-21.
255. Iordanou, K. (2010). ‘Developing argument skills across scientific and social domains’. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 293-27.
256. Iordanou, K. (2013). ‘Developing face-to-face argumentation skills: does arguing on the computer help?’ Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 292-320.
257. Iordanou, K. & Constantinou, C. P. (2014). ‘Developing pre-service teachers’ evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues’. Learning and Instruction, 34, 42-57.
258. Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Miller, B. W., Kim I., et al. (2011). ‘Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions’. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 194-230.
259. Jaffe, A. & Quinn, F. (1993). ‘Theoretical mathematics: towards a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics’. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 29, 1-13.
260. Jeong, A. & Joung, S. (2007). ‘Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels’. Computers & Education, 48, 427-45.
261. Jermann, P. & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). ‘Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL scenario’. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (eds.), Arguing to Learn:Confronting Cognitions in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments(pp. 205-26). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
262. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). ‘Thinking about theories or thinking with theories? A classroom study with natural selection’. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 51-61.
263. Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (1975). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperation, Competition, and Individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
264. Johnson, D. W. & Johnsson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
265. Jonassen, D. H. & Kim, B. (2010). ‘Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines’. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 58(4), 439-57.
266. Jones, K. (2000). ‘Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: students’ interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1-2), 55-85.
267. Kapur, M. (2008). ‘Productive failure’. Cognition & Instruction, 26, 379-424.
268. Kedem, O. (1999). '“Temporarily definitive”: the planning, development, production and educational implementation of a series of films and its effects on students’ conceptions and views regarding the nature of science’. PhD dissertation. University of Salford, UK.
269. Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C. M. & Resnick, L. B. (2000). ‘Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues’. Cognition and instruction, 18(1), 53-81.
270. Keil, F. C. (2006). ‘Explanation and understanding’. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 227-54.
271. Keith, S. & Martin, M. E. (2005). ‘Cyber-bullying: creating a culture of respect in a cyber world’. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 13(4), 224-8.
272. Kennedy, K. (ed.) (2004). Citizenship Education and the Modern State. London:Routledge Falmer.
273. Kienhues, D., Bromme, R. & Stahl, E. (2008). ‘Changing epistemological beliefs: the unexpected impact of a short-term intervention’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 545-65.
274. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. W. (1984). ‘Social psychological aspects of computermediated communication’. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-34.
275. Kim, I.-H., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. & Archodidou, A. (2007). ‘Discourse patterns during children’s collaborative online discussions’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 333-70.
276. Kincheloe, J. L. & Steinberg, S. (1997). Changing Multiculturalism: New Times, New Curriculum. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
277. King, A. & Rosenshine, B. (1993). ‘Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction’. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(2), 127-48.
278. Kingery, J. N., Erdley, C. A. & Marshall, K. C. (2011). ‘Peer acceptance and friendship as predictors of early adolescence’ adjustment across the middle school transition’. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 57(3), 215-43.
279. Klahr, D. & Nigam, M. (2004). ‘The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning’. Psychological Science, 15, 661-7.
280. Kleine Staarman, J. & Mercer, N. (2010). ‘The guided construction of knowledge:talk between teachers and students’. In K. Littleton, C. Wood & J. Kleine Staarman (eds.), International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp. 75-104). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
281. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1992). ‘The couch, the cathedral, and the laboratory: on the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science’. In A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 113-38). University of Chicago Press.
282. Kollar, I., Fischer, F. & Slotta, J. D. (2007). ‘Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning’. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708-21.
283. Kontopodis, M. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2016). ‘Educational settings as interwoven socio-material orderings: an introduction’. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(1), 1-12.
284. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E. & Siegel, J. (2002). ‘Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work’. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (eds.), Distributed Work(pp. 137-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
285. Krummheuer, G. (1995) ‘The ethnography of argumentation’. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (eds.), The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
286. Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
287. Kuhn, D. (1999). ‘A developmental model of critical thinking’. Educational Researcher, 28, 16-25.
288. Kuhn, D. & Crowell, A. (2011). ‘Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking’. Psychological Science, 22, 545-52.
289. Kuhn, D. & Udell, W. (2003). ‘The development of argument skills’. Child Development, 74(5), 1245-60.
290. Kuhn, D. & Udell, W. (2007). ‘Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument’. Thinking and Reasoning, 13, 90-104.
291. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R. & Weinstock, M. (2000). ‘The development of epistemological understanding’. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309-28.
292. Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L. & Khait, V. (2014). Argue with Me: Developing Thinking and Writing through Dialog. Bronxville, NY: Wessex Press.
293. Kuhn, D., Wang, Y. & Li, L. (2011). ‘Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and values of argumentive discourse’. Discourse Processes, 48, 26-49.
294. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M. & Flaton, R. (1994). ‘Historical reasoning as theory:evidence coordination’. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (eds.), Cognitive and instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 377-402). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
295. Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K. & Shaenfield, D. (2008). ‘Arguing on the computer: a microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment’. Child Development, 79, 1310-28.
296. Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A. & Zavala, J. (2013). ‘Developing norms of argumentation: metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence’, Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456-96.
297. Laborde, C. (1995). ‘Designing tasks for learning geometry in computer-based environment, the case of Cabri-géomètre’. In L. Burton & B. Jaworski (eds.), Technology in Mathematics Teaching: A Bridge between Teaching and Learning (pp. 35-68). London: Chartwell-Bratt.
298. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge University Press.
299. Lampert, M. (1990a). ‘Connecting inventions with conventions’. In L. P. Steffe & T. Wood (eds.), Transforming Children’s Mathematics Education (pp. 253-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
300. Lampert, M. (1990b). ‘When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: mathematical knowing and teaching’. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29-63.
301. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
302. Lee, C. D. (2007). Culture, Literacy and Learning: Taking Bloom in the Midst of the Whirlwind. New York: Teachers College Press.
303. Lee, P. J. (2005). ‘Putting principles into practice: Understanding history’. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (eds.), How Students Learn:History in the Classroom (pp. 29-78). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
304. Lee, P. J. & Ashby, R. (2000). ‘Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7-14'. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas and S. Wineburg (eds.), Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives (pp. 199-222). New York: New York University Press.
305. Leman, P. J. (2010). ‘Gender, collaboration and children’s learning’. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (eds.), Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction (pp. 216-39). London: Routledge.
306. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
307. Levstik, L. S. (2000). ‘Articulating the silences: teachers’ and adolescents’ conceptions of historical significance’. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas & S. Wineburg (eds.), Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives (pp. 284-305). New York: New York University Press.
308. Light, P. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1989). ‘Social context effects in learning and testing.’ In A. Gellatly, D. Rogers & J.-A. Sloboda (Eds.). Cognition and Social Worlds (pp. 99-112). Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, University Press.
309. Limón, M. (2001). ‘On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal’. Learning & Instruction, 11, 357-80.
310. Lin, T-Z., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Baker, A. R., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., et al. (2015). ‘Less is more: teachers’ influence during peer collaboration’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 609.
311. Littleton, K. & Howe, C. (eds.) (2010). Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction. London: Routledge.
312. Lulle, R. (c. 1280). The Book of Blaquerne [Le livre de l’ami et de l’aimé, trans. G. Levis Mano and J. Palau, 1953.
313. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The Two Sexes: Growing Up Apart, Coming Together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
314. Maltz, D. & Borker, R. (1982). ‘A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication’. In: J. Gumperz (ed.), Language and Social Identity (pp. 281-312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
315. Mariotti, M. A. (2001). ‘Introduction to proof: the mediation of a dynamic software environment’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1&2), 25-53.
316. Mason, L. & Bromme, R. (2010). ‘Situating and relating epistemological beliefs into metacognition: studies on beliefs about knowledge and knowing’. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 1-6.
317. Mason, L. & Scirica, F. (2006). ‘Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding’. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492-509.
318. Matusov, E. (1996). ‘Intersubjectivity without agreement’. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(1), 25-45.
319. McCarthy-Young, K. & Leinhardt, G. (1998). ‘Writing from primary documents: a way of knowing in history’. Written Communication, 15(1), 25-68.
320. McLaren, P. (2015). Pedagogy of Insurrection. New York: Peter Lang.
321. Means, M. L. & Voss, J. F. (1996). ‘Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels’. Cognition & Instruction, 14, 139-79.
322. Megill, A. (1989). ‘Recounting the past: “description,” explanation, and narrative in historiography’. American Historical Review, 94, 627-53.
323. Mehan, H. (1977), ‘Students’ formulating practices and instructional strategies’. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 285, 451-75.
324. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
325. Meloth, M. S. & Deering, P. D. (1999). ‘The role of the teacher in promoting cognitive processing during collaborative learning’. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp. 235-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
326. Mercer, N. (1996). ‘The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom’. Learning & Instruction, 6, 359-75.
327. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London:Routledge.
328. Mercer, N. (2008). ‘The seeds of time: why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33-59.
329. Mercer, N. & Hodgkinson, S. (eds.) (2008). Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes. London: Sage.
330. Mercer, N. & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London: Routledge.
331. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R. & Dawes, L. (1999). ‘Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom’. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111.
332. Mercer, N., Dawes, R., Wegerif, R. & Sams, C. (2004). ‘Reasoning as a scientist:ways of helping children to use language to learn science’. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 3, 367-85.
333. Mevarech, Z. R. & Light, P. (1992). ‘Peer-based interaction at the computer: looking backward, looking forward’. Learning and Instruction, 2 (3), 275-80.
334. Michaels, S. (1999). ‘A pedagogy for multiliteracies: circle up time in the investigators club as a case in point’. Unpublished manuscript, Jacob Hiatt Center for Urban Education, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
335. Michaels, S, O’Connor C. & Resnick, L. B., (2008). ‘Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 283-97.
336. Michaels, S, O’Connor, C. & Hall, M. W., with Resnick, L. B. (2002). Accountable Talk: Classroom Conversation That Works (3 CD-ROM set). University of Pittsburgh.
337. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A. & Middleton, M. (2001). ‘Performance-approach goals:good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?’ Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
338. Miller, M. (1987). ‘Argumentation and cognition’. In M. Hickman (ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought (pp. 225-49). San Diego:Academic Press.
339. Miyake, N. (1986). Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science, 10, 151-177.
340. Moscovici, S. & Zavalloni, M. (1969). ‘The group as a polarizer of attitudes’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-35.
341. Muller Mirza, N. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2009). Argumentation and Education:Theoretical Foundations and Practices. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
342. Muntigl, P. & Turnbull, W. (1998). ‘Conversational structure and facework in arguing’. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 225-56.
343. Naess, A. (1966). Communication and Argument: Elements of Applied Semantics. London: Allen and Unwin.
344. Newcomb, A. F. & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). ‘Children’s friendship relations: a metaanalytic review’. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306-47.
345. Newell, A. & Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
346. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). ‘Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance’. Psychological Review, 91, 328-46.
347. Nisan, M. & Shalif, Y. (2006). ‘The sense of the worthy as a motivation for studying: the case of the Yeshiva. Interchange, 37(4), 363-94.
348. Nonnon, E. (1996). ‘Activités argumentatives et élaboration de connaissances nouvelles: le dialogue comme espace d’exploration. [Argumentative activities and elaboration of new knowledge: dialogue as a space of exploration]’. Langue Française, 112, 67-87.
349. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M. & Chizari, M. (2012). ‘Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL):a synthesis of 15 years of research’. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79-106.
350. Nussbaum, E. M. (2005). ‘The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation’. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 286-313.
351. Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). ‘Using argumentation vee diagrams (AVDs) for promoting argument/counter-argument integration in reflective writing’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 549-65.
352. Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). ‘Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education’. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 84-106.
353. Nussbaum, E. M. & Bendixen, L. M. (2003). ‘Approaching and avoiding arguments:the role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits’. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 573-95.
354. Nussbaum, E. M. & Edwards, O. V. (2013). ‘Critical questions and argument stratagems: a framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices.’ Journal of the Learning Sciences.
355. Nussbaum, E. M. & Kardash, C. M. (2005). ‘The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 157-69.
356. Nussbaum, E. M. & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). ‘Argument and conceptual engagement’. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 384-95.
357. Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M. & Poliquin, A. (2008). ‘Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning’. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977-99.
358. Nystrand, M. & Gamoran, A. (1991). ‘Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement’. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-90.
359. O’Connor, M. C., Godfrey, L. & Moses, R. P. (1998). ‘The missing data point:negotiating purposes in classroom mathematics, science’. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (eds.), Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science (pp. 89-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
360. Ochs, E. & Jacoby, S. (1997). ‘Down to the wire: the cultural clock of physicists and the discourse of consensus’. Language in Society, 26(4), 479-506.
361. Ochs, E., Gonzales, P. & Jacoby, S. (1996). ‘When I come down I’m in a domain state: talk, gesture, and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists’. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 328-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
362. Oh, S. C. & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). ‘Scaffolding argumentation during problem solving’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95-105.
363. Osborne, J. (2010). ‘Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse’. Science, 328, 463-8.
364. Palincsar, A. & Brown, A. (1984). ‘Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities’. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-75.
365. Paul, R. (1990). Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
366. Pauli, C. & Reusser, K. (2015). ‘Discursive cultures of learning in (everyday) mathematics teaching: a video-based study on mathematics teaching in German and Swiss classrooms’. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan & C. Clarke (eds.), Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue(pp. 181-93). Washington, DC: AERA.
367. Pedemonte, B. (2007). ‘How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analyzed’? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 23-41.
368. Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
369. Perkins, D. N., Farady, M. & Bushey, B. (1991). ‘Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence’. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & J. W. Segal (eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education (pp. 83-105). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
370. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social Interaction and Cognitive Development in Children. London: Academic.
371. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). The Architecture of Social Relationships and Thinking Spaces for Growth. In C. Psaltis, A. Gillespie & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (eds.), Social Relations in Human and Societal Development (pp. 51-70). Basingstokes (Hampshire, UK): Palgrave Macmillan.
372. Pintrich, P. R. & Garcia, T. (1991). ‘Students’ goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom’. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Goals and Self-Regulatory Processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
373. Plantin, C. (1996). L’Argumentation. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
374. Plantin, C. (2005). L’argumentation - Histoire, théories, perspectives. [Argumentation -History, Theories, Perspectives]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
375. Plantin, C. (2011). Les bonnes raisons des émotions. Principes et méthode pour l’étude du discours émotionné. [The Good Reasons of Emotions: Principles and Method for the Study of Emotional Discourse]. Berne: Peter Lang.
376. Pólya, G. (1948) How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. New York: Doubleday.
377. Pólya, G. (1954) Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vol. I: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, and Vol. II: Patterns of Plausible Inference. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
378. Pontecorvo, C. & Girardet, H. (1993). ‘Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics’. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3-4), 365-95.
379. Pontefract, C. & Hardman, F. C. (2005). ‘The discourse of classroom interaction in Kenyan primary schools’. Comparative Education, 41(1), 87-106.
380. Porsch, T. & Bromme, R. (2011). ‘Effects of epistemological sensitization on source choices’. Instructional Science, 39(6), 805-19.
381. Prusak, N., Hershkowitz, R. & Schwarz, B. B. (2012). ‘From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 19-40.
382. Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., King, K. & Teppo, A. (2005). ‘Advancing mathematical activity: a practice-oriented view of mathematical thinking’. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 51-73.
383. Rav, Y. (1999). ‘Why do we prove theorems?’ Philosophia Mathematica, 7, 5-41.
384. Reisman, A. (2012). ‘Reading like a historian: a document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools’. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86-112.
385. Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C. & Clarke, S. (2015). Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC: AERA.
386. Salmon, M., Michaels, S. & O’Connor, C. (2010). ‘How (well structured) talk builds the mind’. In D. Preiss & R. Sternberg (eds.), Innovations in Educational Psychology: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Human Development(pp. 163-94). New York: Springer.
387. Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H. & Holowchak, M. (1993). ‘Reasoning in conversation’. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347-64.
388. Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C. & Kuo, L. (2007). ‘Teaching and learning argumentation’. Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449-72.
389. Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A. & Kim, S. (2001). ‘Influence of oral discussion on written argument’. Discourse Processes, 32(2-3), 155-75.
390. Rigotti, E. & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). ‘Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource’. In N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices (pp. 9-66). New York: Springer.
391. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
392. Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford University Press.
393. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, And Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
394. Roschelle, J. (1992). ‘Learning by collaborating: converging conceptual change’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-76.
395. Rosebery, A., Warren, B. & Conant, F. (1992). ‘Appropriating scientific discourse:findings from language minority classrooms’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61-94.
396. Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
397. Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M., Mason, R. A. & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). ‘Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478-93.
398. Rummel, N. & Spada, H. (2005). ‘Learning to collaborate: an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-41.
399. Rummel, N., Spada, H. & Hauser, S. (2009). ‘Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 69-92.
400. Sabine, G. H. (1966). A History of Political Theory. London: George G. Harrap.
401. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
402. Sandoval, W. (2003). ‘Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51.
403. Sarason, S. B. (1971). Revisiting the Culture of School and the Problem of Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
404. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, K. (1994). ‘Computer support for knowledge-building communities’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-83.
405. Schellens, T., van Keer, H., de Wever, B. & Valcke, M. (2007). ‘Scripting by assigning roles: does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?’ International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 225-46.
406. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N. & McLaren, B. M. (2010). ‘Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state-of-the-art’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43-102.
407. Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., Perret-Clermont, A.-N. & Grossen, M. (1992). ‘The construction of adult child intersubjectivity in psychological research and in school’. In M. V. Cranach, W. Doise & G. Mugny (eds.), Social Representations and the Social Bases of Knwledge, Swiss Psychological Society (Vol. 1, pp. 69-77). Berne: Hogrefe & Hube.
408. Schuitema, J., Ten Dam, G. & Veugelers, W. (2008). ‘Teaching strategies for moral education: a review’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 69-89.
409. Schwarz, B. B. (2003). ‘Collective reading of multiple texts in argumentative activities’. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 133-51.
410. Schwarz, B. B. (2009). ‘Argumentation and learning’. InMuller-Mirza and A.-N. Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices(pp. 91-126). New York: Springer Verlag.
411. Schwarz, B. B. (2011). '“Hevruta” learning in Lithuanian yeshivas: recurrent learning of Talmudic issues’. In I. Etkes, T. El’or, M. Heyd & B. B. Schwarz (eds.), Education and Religion: Authority and Autonomy (pp. 279-308). ST. Louis, MO: Magness.
412. Schwarz, B. B. (2014). ‘Authoritative or authoritarian voices in traditional learning in Jewish institutions’. In A. Iannacone & T. Zittoun (eds.), Activities of Thinking in Social Spaces (pp. 129-46). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
413. Schwarz, B. B. (2015). ‘Discussing argumentative texts as a traditional Jewish learning practice’. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C., Asterhan & S. Clarke (eds.), Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue (pp. 153-62). Washington, DC: AREA.
414. Schwarz, B. B. & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2010). ‘Argumentation and reasoning’. In K. Littleton, C. Wood and J. Kleine Staarman (eds.), International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp. 137-76). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
415. Schwarz, B. B. & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2011). ‘E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: a nascent practice’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 395-442.
416. Schwarz, B. B. & Baker, M. J. (2015). ‘Sur l’adéquation des théories de l’argumentation aux sciences de l’apprentissage et les fondements d’une théorie de « l’argumentissage »'. In N. Muller-Mirza & C. Buty (eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 269-322). Berne: Peter Lang.
417. Schwarz, B. B. & Caduri, G. (2016). ‘Novelties in the use of social networks by leading teachers in their classes’. Computers and Education, 102, 35-51.
418. Schwarz, B. B. & De Groot, R. (2007). ‘Argumentation in a changing world’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 297-313.
419. Schwarz, B. B. & Glassner, A. (2003). ‘The blind and the paralytic: fostering argumentation in social and scientific domains’. In J. Andriessen, M. J. Baker & D. Suthers (eds.) Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments (pp. 227-60). Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
420. Schwarz, B. B. & Glassner, A. (2007). ‘The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 449-78.
421. Schwarz, B. B. & Goldberg, T. (2013). '“Look who’s talking”: identity and emotions as resources to historical peer reasoning’. In M. J. Baker, J. E. B. Andriessen & S. Järvelä (eds), Affective Learning Together (pp. 272-91). London: Routledge.
422. Schwarz, B. B. & Linchevski, L. (2007). ‘The role of task design and of argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction: the case of proportional reasoning’. Learning & Instruction, 17(5), 510-31.
423. Schwarz, B. B. & Prusak, N. (2016). ‘The importance of multi-modality in mathematical argumentation’. In F. Paglieri (ed.), The Psychology of Argument:Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion: Studies in Logic and Argumentation. London: College Publications.
424. Schwarz, B. B. & Shahar, N. (in press). ‘Combining the dialogic and the dialectic:putting argumentation into practice for classroom talk’. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.
425. Schwarz, B. B., Ben-David Kolikant, Y. & Mishenkina, M. (2012). '“Co-alienation” mediated by common representations in synchronous discussions’. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 216-31.
426. Schwarz, B. B., Hershkowitz, R. & Prusak, N. (2010). ‘Argumentation and mathematics’. In C. Howe & K. Littleton (eds.), Educational Dialogues:Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction (pp. 115-41). London:Routledge.
427. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y. & Biezuner, S. (2000). ‘Two “wrongs” may make a right… if they argue together!’ Cognition & Instruction, 18(4), 461-94.
428. Schwarz, B. B., de Groot, R., Mavrikis, M. & Dragon, T. (2015). ‘Learning to learn together with CSCL tools’. international Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 10(3), 239-71.
429. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J. and Ilya, M. (2003) ‘Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 219-56.
430. Schwarz, B. B., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Trognon, A. & Marro, P. (2008). ‘Learning processes within and between successive activities in a laboratory context’. Pragmatics and Cognition, 16(1), 57-87.
431. Schwarz, B. B., Schur, Y., Pensso, H. & Tayer, N. (2011). ‘Perspective taking and argumentation for learning the day/night cycle’. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 113-38.
432. Sekiguchi, Y. (2002). ‘Mathematical proof, argumentation, and classroom communication:from a cultural perspective’. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 21, 11-20.
433. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as Communicating. Cambridge University Press.
434. Sfard, A. & Linchevski, L. (1994). ‘The gains and pitfalls of reification - the case of algebra’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 191-228.
435. Shane-Sagiv, C. (2011). ‘Effort after meaning in the history classroom’. PhD thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
436. Shayer, M. & Adey, P. (1993). ‘Accelerating the development of formal operational thinking in high school pupils. IV: Three years on after a two-year intervention’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 351-66.
437. Shor, I. (1992). Empowering Education. University of Chicago Press.
438. Shor, I. (1999). Education Is Politics: Critical Teaching across Differences (K-12), Vol. 1. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton-Cook/Heinemann.
439. Shor, I. & Freire, P. (1987). A Pedagogy for Liberation: Dialogues on Transforming Education. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
440. Sinatra, G. M. & Broughton, S. H. (2011). ‘Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science: the promise of refutation text’. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 374-93.
441. Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford University Press.
442. Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., van Joolingen, W. R. & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2011). ‘Effects of face-to-face versus chat communication on performance in a collaborative inquiry modeling task’. Computers & Education, 56(2), 379-87.
443. Sitri, F. (2003). L’objet du débat: La construction des objets de discours dans des situations argumentatives orales [The Object of Debate: The Construction of Discursive Objects in Situations of Oral Argumentation]. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.
444. Sivashanker, K. (2013). ‘Cyberbullying and the digital self’. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(2), 113-15.
445. Skinner, B. F. (1961). ‘Teaching machines’. Scientific American, 205, 90-112.
446. Slakmon, B. (2015). ‘The emergence of the dialogic dimension in the philosophy classroom’. PhD thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
447. Slakmon, B. & Schwarz, B. B. (2014). ‘Disengaged students and dialogic learning:the role of CSCL affordances’. International Journal of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 157-83.
448. Sofer-Vital, S., Schwarz, B. B. & Butler, R. (2012). ‘Achievement goals, argumentation and conceptual change in science’. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Change, University of Trier, Germany.
449. Sohmer, R. E. (2000). '“A page so big no one can fall off”: apprenticeship as the architecture of intersubjectivity in an after-school science program for inner city middle school students’. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 928.
450. Solomon, Y. & O’Neill, J. (1998). ‘Mathematics and narrative’. Language and Education, 12(3), 210-21.
451. Stampfer, S. (1995). The Lithuanian Yeshiva in Its Emergence. Jerusalem: Merkaz Zalman Shazar [in Hebrew].
452. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015). Stanford University.
453. Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (2012). ‘Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment’. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297-323.
454. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (2007). ‘Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421-47.
455. Stein, N. L. & Albro, E. R. (2001). ‘The origins and nature of arguments: sStudies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation’. Discourse Processes, 32(2-3), 113-33.
456. Stein, N. L. & Miller, C. A. (1993). ‘A theory of argumentative understanding:relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning’. Argumentation, 7(2), 183-204.
457. Stokoe, E. H. (2000). ‘Towards a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse’. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 552-63.
458. Suler, J. (2004). ‘The online disinhibition effect’. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321-6.
459. Suthers, D. D. (2003). ‘Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry’. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments(pp. 27-46). Dodrecht: Kluwer.
460. Suthers, D. D. & Weiner, A. (1995). ‘Groupware for developing critical discussion skills’. Available online at: www-cscl95.indiana.edu/suthers.html.
461. Takano, Y. & Osaka, E. (1999). ‘An unsupported common view: comparing Japan and the US on individualism/collectivism’. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(3), 311-41.
462. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
463. Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
464. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). ‘The impact of accountability on judgment and choice:toward a social contingency model’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-76.
465. Thompson, P. (2012). ‘Both dialogic and dialectic: “translation at crossroads”'. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 90-101.
466. Thorley, N. R. & Treagust, D. F. (1987). ‘Conflict within dyadic interactions as a stimulant for conceptual change in physics’. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 203-16.
467. Thurston, W. P. (1994). ‘On proof and progress in mathematics’. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30, 161-77.
468. Tiruneh, D., Verburgh, A. & Elen, J. (2014). ‘Effectiveness of critical thinking instruction in higher education: a systematic review of intervention studies’. Higher Education Studies, 4(1), 1-17.
469. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
470. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R. & Janik, R. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning (2nd edn.). New York: Macmillan.
471. Toulouse, E. (1910). Henri Poincaré (source biography in French), University of Michigan Historic Math Collection.
472. Trognon, A. (1993). ‘How does the process of interaction work when two interlocutors try to resolve a logical problem?’ Cognition and Instruction, 11(3-4), 325-45.
473. Trognon, A. (1999). 'Éléments d’analyse interlocutoire [Elements of Interlocutionary Analysis]’. In M. Gilly, J.-P. Roux & A. Trognon (eds.), Apprendre dans l’interaction [Learning in Interaction] (pp. 69-94). Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
474. Trognon, A. & Batt, M. (2003). ‘Comment représenter le passage de l’intersubjectif à l’intrasubjectif? [How to represent the passage from the intrasubjective to the intersubjective?]’. L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 32(3), 399-436.
475. Van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J. & Kanselaar, G. (2007). ‘Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: how dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams.’ Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 485-521.
476. Van Der Puil, C., Andriessen, J. & Kanselaar, G. (2004). ‘Exploring relational regulation in computer-mediated (collaborative) learning interaction: a developmental perspective’. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(2), 183-95.
477. Van Drie, J. & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). ‘Historical reasoning: towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past’. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87-110.
478. van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
479. van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (2003). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press.
480. van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., et al. (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht:Springer.
481. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkenmans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Background and Contemporary Developments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
482. Van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B. & Paas, F. (2009). ‘Uncovering cognitive processes: different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction’. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 325-31.
483. von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J. & Simon, S. (2008). ‘Arguing to learn and learning to argue: case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 101-31.
484. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: Falmer.
485. Vosniadou, S. (1994). ‘Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change’. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69.
486. Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1992). ‘Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood’. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-85.
487. Voss, J. & Means, M. (1991). ‘Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation’. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337-50.
488. Voss, J. & Wiley, J. (1999). ‘Constructing arguments from multiple sources: tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301-11.
489. Vygotsky L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, eds. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge University Press.
490. Vygotsky L. (1986). Thought and Language, ed. A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
491. Walbridge, J. (2011). God and Logic in Islam: The Caliphate of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
492. Walker, A. (2004). ‘Socratic strategies and devil’s advocacy in synchronous CMC debate’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 172-82.
493. Walther, J. B. (1996). ‘Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction’. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
494. Walton, D. N. (1977). Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.
495. Walton, D. N. (1989). Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
496. Walton, D. N. (1992a). Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
497. Walton, D. N. (1992b). The Place of Emotion in Argument. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.
498. Warren, B. & Rosebery, A. S. (1996). '“This question is just too, too easy!" Students’ perspectives on accountability in science’. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (eds.), Innovations in Learning: New Environments for Education (pp. 97-125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
499. Wason, P. C. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content. London: Batsford.
500. Weatherall, A. (2000). ‘Re-visions for gender and language research in the 21st century’. In J. Holmes (ed.), Gendered Speech in Social Context: Perspectives From Town and Gown (pp. 39-51). Wellington, NZ: Victoria University Press.
501. Webb, N. M. (1991). ‘Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups’. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-89.
502. Webb, N. M. (1995). ‘Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-23.
503. Webb, N. M. (2009). ‘The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1-28.
504. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D. & Fall, R. (1995). ‘Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-23.
505. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C. & Ing, M. (2015). ‘An exploration of teacher practices in relation to profiles in small-group dialogue’. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C., Asterhan & S. Clarke (eds.), Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue (pp. 87-98). Washington, DC: AREA.
506. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Chan, A., De, T. et al. (2008). ‘The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration’. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 360-81.
507. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., et al. (2009). ‘Teachers’ instructional practices and small-group dialogue’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 49-70.
508. Weber, K., Inglis, M. & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2014). ‘How mathematicians obtain conviction: implications for mathematics instruction and research on epistemic cognition’. Educational Psychologist, 49, 36-58.
509. Wecker, C. & Fischer, F. (2014). ‘Where is the evidence? A meta-analysis on the role of argumentation for the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in computersupported collaborative learning’. Computers & Education, 75, 218-28.
510. Wegerif, R. B. (2007). Dialogic, Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. New York: Springer.
511. Wegerif, R. B. (2011). ‘From dialectic to dialogic’. In T. Koschmann (ed.), Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice (pp. 201-21). New York: Springer Science.
512. Wegerif, R. B. (2013). Education in the Internet Age. New York: Routledge.
513. Wegerif, R. B. & Scrimshaw, P. (eds.) (1997). Computers and Talk in the Primary Classroom. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
514. Wegerif, R. B., Mercer, N., Dawes, L. (1999). ‘From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development’. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493-516.
515. Wegerif, R. B., Linares, J. P., Rojas-Drummond, S., Mercer, N. & Vélez, M. (2005). ‘Thinking together in the UK and Mexico: transfer of an educational innovation’. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40, 40-8.
516. Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (2006). ‘A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning’. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.
517. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F. & Stegmann, K. (2005). ‘Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups’. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: The Next 10 Years!
518. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K. & Fischer, F. (2010). ‘Learning to argue online:scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not)'. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 506-15.
519. Weinberger, A. Marttunen, M., Laurinen, L., Stegmann, K. (2013). ‘Inducing sociocognitive conflict in Finnish and German groups of online learners by CSCL script’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 333-9.
520. Weinstock, M. (2011). ‘Narrative and relational argument orientations: knowledgetelling and knowledge-transforming in verdict justifications’. Thinking & Reasoning, 17, 282-314.
521. Weinstock, M., Neuman, Y. & Glassner, A. (2006). ‘Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level, and cognitive ability’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 327-34.
522. Weinstock, M., Neuman, Y. & Tabak, I. (2004). ‘Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments’. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 77-94.
523. Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M. & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). ‘Friendship in middle school:influences on motivation and school adjustment’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195-203.
524. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
525. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
526. Wertsch, J. V. (1993). ‘Commentary on Lawrence J. A. & Valsiner J., Conceptual roots of internalization: from transmission to transformation’. Human Development, 36, 168-71.
527. Wertsch, J. V. & Kazak, S. (2011). ‘Saying more than you know in instructional settings’. In T. Koschmann (ed.), Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice (pp. 153-66). New York: Springer Science.
528. Wiley, J. & Voss, J. F. (1999). ‘Constructing arguments from multiple sources: tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301-11.
529. Williams, D. (2004). Condorcet and Modernity. Cambridge University Press.
530. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). ‘On the reading of historical texts: notes on the breach between school and academy’. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495-519.
531. Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Temple University Press.
532. Wineburg, S. S. & Martin D. (2004). ‘Reading and rewriting history’. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 42-5.
533. Wineburg, S. S., Martin, D. & Monte-Sano, C. (2011). Reading Like a Historian. New York: Teachers College Press.
534. Yackel, E. (2002). ‘What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation’. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423-40.
535. Yackel, E. & Cobb, P. (1996). ‘Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics’. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-77.
536. Yarden, A. (2009). ‘Guest editorial - Reading scientific texts: adapting primary literature for promoting scientific literacy’. Research in Science Education, 39, 307-11.
537. Yerushalmy, M. & Houde, R. A. (1986). ‘The geometric supposer: promoting thinking and learning’. Mathematics Teacher, 79, 418-22.
538. Zajac, R. J. & Hartup, W. W. (1997). ‘Friends as co-workers: research review and classroom implications’. Elementary School Journal, 98, 3-13.
539. Zohar, A. & Ben-David, A. (2008). ‘Paving a clear path in a thick forest: a conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component’. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 177-95.
540. Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). ‘Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.