Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 421-447

  Stegmann, Karsten ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^a   Fischer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Argumentative knowledge construction; Computer supported collaboration scripts; Online discussion

Indexed keywords

EID: 36549040610     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003a). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Andriessen, J., Erkens, G., van de Laak, C., Peters, N., & Coirier, P. (2003b). Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative writing. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Astleitner, H. (2002). Teaching critical thinking online. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 53-76.
4. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3), 175-193.
6. Carmien, S., Kollar, I., Fischer, G., & Fischer, F. (2007). The interplay of internal and external scripts-a distributed cognition perspective. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 303-326). New York: Springer.
7. Carroll, J. M., & Carrithers, C. (1984). Blocking learner error states in a training-wheel system. Human Factors, 26(4), 377-389.
8. Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145-182.
9. Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 343-374.
10. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
11. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
12. Dillenbourg, P. (2004). "Split Where Interaction Should Happen," a model for designing CSCL scripts. In P. Gerjets, P. A. Kirschner, J. Elen, & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning (pp. i-ii, CD-ROM). Tübinge: Knowledge Media Research Center.
13. Dochy, F. J. R. C., Segers, M., & van den Bossche, P. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568.
14. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.
15. Donmez, P., Rosé, C. P., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005). Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning-CSCL 2005 (pp. 125-134). Taipei, TW: Erlbaum.
16. Erkens, G. (1998). Multiple episode protocol analysis (MEPA 3.0): Department of Educational Sciences. The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
17. Fischer, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2006, April). Challenges of orchestrating computer-supported collaborative learning. Paper presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA).
18. Hanley, G. L. (1995). Teaching critical thinking: Focusing on metacognitive skills and problem solving. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 68-72.
19. Howe, C. (2005). Group work and conceptual growth in science: Taking account of post-group effects. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of EARLI.
20. Hron, A., Hesse, F.-W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25(1), 56-69.
21. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Learning to argue (Vol. 1, pp. 205-226). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
22. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Constructive conflict in schools. Journal of Social Issues, 50(1), 117-137.
23. Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C. M., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 53-81.
24. King, A. (1997). Ask to think-Tel why: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 221-226.
25. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 13-37). New York: Springer.
26. Kintsch, W. (1991). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. In G. Denhière & J.-P. Rossi (Eds.), Text and text processing (pp. 107-153). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 211-224.
28. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts-a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.
29. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2005). Internal and external collaboration scripts in webbased science learning at schools. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 Years (pp. 331-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Koschmann, T. (2003). CSCL, argumentation and deweyan inquiry: Argumentation is learning. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
31. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kuhn, D., & Goh, W. W. L. (2005). Arguing on the computer. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years (pp. 125-134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315.
34. Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
35. Marttunen, M. (1992). Commenting on written arguments as a part of argumentation skills: Comparison between students engaged in traditional vs on-line study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36(4), 289-302.
36. Marttunen, M. (1994). Assessing argumentation skills among Finnish university students. Learning and Instruction, 4(2), 175-191.
37. Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139-178.
38. Nastasi, B. K., & Clements, D. H. (1992). Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments. Learning and Instruction, 2, 215-238.
39. Nistor, N. (2003). Koalah: A problem-based virtual seminar on the WWW. In R. C. Geibert & S. Hunter-Harvey (Eds.), Web-wise learning: Wisdom from the field (pp. 337-362). Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.
40. Nussbaum, E. M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G. M., Reynolds, R. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (2002, April). Enahancing the quality of on-line discussions. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
41. O'Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-141). Cambridge: University Press.
42. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
43. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of "scaffolding" and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
44. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88-110). Cambridge: University Press.
45. Pithers, R. T. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Researcher, 42(3), 237-249.
46. Resnick, L. B., Salomon, M., Zeitz, C., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347-364.
47. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-630.
48. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.
49. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
50. Stein, N. L., & Bernas, R. S. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skills. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97-116). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
51. Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1996). A theory of argumentive understanding: Relationship among position preference, judgements of goodness, memory and reasoning. Argumentation, 7, 183-204.
52. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-355.
53. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. van Eemeren, F. H. (2003). A glance behind the scenes: The state of the art in the study of argumentation. Studies in communication Sciences, 3(1), 1-23.
55. Voss, J. F., Tyler, S. W., & Yengo, L. A. (1983). Individual differences in the solving of social science problems. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (pp. 205-232). New York: Academic.
56. Voss, J. F., & van Dyke, J. A. (2001). Narrative structure, information certainty, emotional content, and gender as factors in a pseudo jury decision-making task. Discourse Processes, 32(2&3), 215-243.
57. Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
58. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
59. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität (LMU), Munich, Germany. Available at: http://edoc.ub.uni- muenchen.de/archive/00001120/01/Weinberger_Armin.pdf.
60. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95.
61. Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating computer-supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in network-based knowledge communication in groups (pp. 15-37). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
62. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge-cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 191-211). New York: Springer.
63. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.