The Development of Argument Skills

Child Development

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1245-1260

  Kuhn, Deanna ^a   Udell, Wadiya ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142136667     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00605     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Anderson, R., Chinn, C., Waggoner, M., & Nguyen, K. (1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all (pp. 170-196). New York: Guilford.
2. Anderson, R., Chinn, C., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, H. (1997). On the logical integrity of children's arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 135-167.
3. Anderson, R., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodi- dou, A., Kim, S., & Reznitskaya, A., et al. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1-46.
4. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Berkowitz, M., & Gibbs, J. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 399-410.
6. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brem, S., & Rips, L. (2000). Evidence and explanation in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 573-604.
8. Chambliss, M., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Fourth and fifth graders representing the argument structure in written texts. Discourse Processes, 34, 91-115.
9. Chinn, C., & Anderson, R. (1998). The structure of discussions that promote reasoning. Teachers College Record, 100, 315-368.
10. Clark, R., & Delia, J. (1976). The development of functional persuasive skills in childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 47, 1008-1014.
11. Eisenberg, A., & Garvey, C. (1981). Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4, 149-170.
12. Felton, M. (in press). The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation. Cognitive Development.
13. Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32, 135-153.
14. Haith, M., & Benson, J. (1998). Infant cognition. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol II. Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 199-254). New York: Wiley.
15. Hidi, S., Berndorff, D., & Ainley, M. (2002). Children's argument writing, interest and self-efficacy: An intervention. Learning and Instruction, 12, 429-446.
16. Hofer, B., & P. Pintrich (Eds.). (2002). Epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Keefer, M., Zeitz, C., & Resnick, L. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 53-82.
18. Klaczynski, P. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71, 1347-1366.
19. Knudson, R. (1992). Analysis of argumentative writing at two grade levels. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 169-179.
20. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kuhn, D. (1995a). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us? Psychological Science, 6, 133-139.
22. Kuhn, D. (Ed.). (1995b). Development and learning: Reconceptualizing the intersection [Special issue], Human Development, 38(6).
23. Kuhn, D. (2001a). Why development does (and doesn't) occur: Evidence from the domain of inductive reasoning. In R. Siegler & J. McClelland (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Neural and behavioral perspectives (pp. 221-249). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Kuhn, D. (2001b). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12, 1-8.
25. Kühn, D. (in press). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2001). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
27. Kuhn, D., & DeFuccio, M. (2002). Teaching thinking among incarcerated youth. Unpublished manuscript, Teachers College Columbia University.
28. Kuhn, D., & Lao, J. (1996). Effects of evidence on attitudes: Is polarization the norm? Psychological Science, 7, 115-120.
29. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287-315.
30. Lao, J., & Kuhn, D. (2002). Cognitive engagement and attitude development. Cognitive Development, 17, 1203-1217.
31. Mason, L. (1998). Sharing cognition to construct scientific knowledge in school contexts: The role of oral and written discourse. Instructional Science, 26, 359-389.
32. Mason, L. (2001). Introducing talk and writing for conceptual change: A classroom study. In L. Mason (Ed.), Instructional practices for conceptual change in science domains. Learning and Instruction, 11, 305-529.
33. Orsolini, M. (1993). "Dwarfs don't shoot": An analysis of children's justifications. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 281-297.
34. Perkins, D. (1985). Post-primary education has little impact upon informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 563-571.
35. Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365-395.
36. Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32, 155-175.
37. Rips, L. (2002). Circular reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 767-795.
38. Rips, L., Brem, S., & Bailenson, J. (1999). Reasoning dialogues. New Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 172-177.
39. Sa, W., West, R., & Stanovich, K. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 497-510.
40. Siegler, R. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71, 26-35.
41. Siegler, R., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606-620.
42. Siegler, R., & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73, 793-809.
43. Stanovich, K. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Stein, N., & Miller, C. (1993). The development of memory and reasoning skill in argumentative contexts: Evaluating, explaining, and generating evidence. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 285-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R., & Henkemans, F. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Voss, J. (Ed.). (2001). Argumentation in psychology [Special issue]. Discourse Processes, 32(2 & 3).
47. Voss, J., & Means, M. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337-350.
48. Voss, J., & Van Dyke, J. (2001). Argumentation in psychology: Background comments. Discourse Processes, 32, 89-111.
49. Voss, J., & Wiley, J. (1997). Developing understanding while writing essays in history. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 255-265.
50. Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
51. Walton, D. N. (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation, 3, 169-184.
52. Wiley, J., & Voss, J. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301-311.
53. Yeh, S. (2002). Tests worth teaching to: Constructing state-mandated tests that emphasize critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 30, 12-17.
54. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.