Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior

Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 338-376

  Herring, Susan C ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910020167     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (114)

1. Alford, R. A. (1998). The Craft of Inquiry: Theories, Methods, Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Baker, A. (1998). Cyberspace couples finding romance online then meeting for the first time in real life. CMC Magazine, July 1998. Retrieved July 21, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1998/jul/baker.html.
5. Barab, S., MaKinster, J., Moore, J., Cunningham, D., & The ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(4) 71-96.
6. Bauer, M. (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound (pp. 131-151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Baym, N. (1995a). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S. Jones (Ed.), 138-163.
8. Baym, N. (1995b). The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(2). Retrieved July 21, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol1/issue2/baym.html.
9. Baym, N. (1999). Tune In, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Bell, A., & Garrett, P. (Eds.) (1998). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Bowers, J. (2000). Weblog communities. Posted February 28, 2000. Retrieved December 31, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://irights.editthispage.com/stories/storyReader$115.
12. Bruckman, A. S., & Resnick, M. (1995). The MediaMOO project: Constructionism and professional community. Convergence, 1(1), 94-109.
13. Burkhalter, B. (1999). Reading race online. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), 60-75.
14. Burnett, G. (2000). Information exchange in virtual communities: A typology. Information Research, 5(4). Retrieved June 15, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.shef.ac.uk/∼is/publications/infres/paper82a.html.
15. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Cherny, L. (1999). Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
17. Cherny, L., & Weise, E. R. (Eds.) (1996). Wired Women: Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace. Seattle: Seal Press.
18. Condon, S. C., & Cech, C. (1996a). Discourse management strategies in face- to-face and computer-mediated decision making interactions. Electronic Journal of Communication, 6(3). Retrieved June 15, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v6n396.htm.
19. Condon, S. C., & Cech, C. (1996b). Functional comparisons of face-to-face and computer-mediated decision making interactions. In S. Herring (Ed.), 65-80.
20. Condon, S. C., & Cech, C. (2001). Profiling turns in interaction: Discourse structure and function. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
21. Condon, S. C., & Cech, C. (in press). Discourse management in three modalities. In S. Herring (Ed.).
22. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational informational requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
24. Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1997). Hmmm… where’s that smoke coming from? Writing, play and performance on Internet Relay Chat. In S. Rafaeli, F. Sudweeks, & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet (pp. 41-76). Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press.
25. Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks virtual and real. Information, Communication & Society, 3, 386-401.
26. Dibbell, J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace, or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. Village Voice, December 21, 1993, 36-42.
27. Etzioni, A. (1999). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities, a comparative analysis. The Information Society, 15, 241-248.
28. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.
29. Fernback, J., & Thompson, B. (1995). Virtual communities: Abort, retry, failure? Retrieved December 31, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.well.com/user/hlr/texts/VCcivil.html.
30. Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8-34.
31. Georgakopoulou, A. (in press). ‘On for drinkies?’: E-mail cues of participant alignments. In S. Herring (Ed.).
32. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Press.
33. Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
34. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Gurak, L. (1996). The rhetorical dynamics of a community protest in cyberspace: What happened with Lotus Marketplace. In S. Herring (Ed.), 265-277.
36. Hall, K. (1996). Cyberfeminism. In S. Herring (Ed.), 147-170.
37. Harwood, W. S., Reiff, R., & Phillipson, T. (2001). Conceptions of scientific inquiry: Voices from the front. Unpublished ms, Indiana University, Bloomington.
38. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved October 2, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html.
39. Herring, S. C. (1992). Gender and participation in computer-mediated linguistic discourse. Washington, D. C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. Document no. ED345552.
40. Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2). Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v3n293.htm.
41. Herring, S. C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz, A. Liang, L. Sutton, & C. Hines (Eds.), Cultural performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 278-294). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
42. Herring, S. C. (1996a). Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer- mediated communication. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer- Mediated Communication (pp. 115-145). Albany: SUNY Press.
43. Herring, S. C. (1996b). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. Herring (Ed.), 81-106.
44. Herring, S. C. (Ed.) (1996c). Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 81-106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45. Herring, S. C. (1998). Le style du courrier electronique: variabilite et changement [Variation and change in e-mail style]. Terminogramme, 84-85, 9-16.
46. Herring, S. C. (1999a). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/.
47. Herring, S. C. (1999b). The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society, 15(3), 151-167.
48. Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. In B. Cronin (Ed.), The Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (pp. 109-168). Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc./American Society for Information Science and Technology.
50. Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 202-228). Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Herring, S. C. (in press a). Who’s got the floor in computer-mediated conversation? Edelsky’s gender patterns revisited. In S. Herring (Ed.).
52. Herring, S. C. (Ed.) (in press b). Computer-Mediated Conversation. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
53. Herring, S. C. (Under consideration). A classification scheme for computer- mediated discourse.
54. Herring, S. C., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18(5), 371-383.
55. Herring, S. C., Johnson, D. A., & DiBenedetto, T. (1992). Participation in electronic discourse in a “feminist” field. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating Power: The Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 250-262). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
56. Herring, S. C., Johnson, D. A., & DiBenedetto, T. (1995). “This discussion is going too far!” Male resistance to female participation on the Internet. In M. Bucholtz & K. Hall (Eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (pp. 67-96). London: Routledge.
57. Herring, S. C., Martinson, A., & Scheckler, R. (2002). Designing for community: The effects of gender representation in videos on a Web site. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
58. Herring, S. C., & Nix, C. G. (1997, March). Is “serious chat” an oxymoron? Academic vs. social uses of Internet Relay Chat. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Orlando, FL.
59. Hert, P. (1997). Social dynamics of an on-line scholarly debate. The Information Society, 13, 329-360.
60. Hiltz, R. S., & Turoff, M. (1978). The Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer. New York: Addison-Wesley.
61. Jacobs-Huey, L. (in press)…. BTW, how do YOU wear your hair? Identity, knowledge and authority in an electronic speech community. In S. Herring (Ed.).
62. Jacobson, D. (1996). Contexts and cues in cyberspace: The pragmatics of naming in text-based virtual realities. Journal of Anthropological Research, 52, 461-481.
63. Jones, Q. (1997). Virtual communities, virtual settlements & cyber-archaeology: A theoretical outline. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3). Retrieved July 25, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue3/jones.htm.
64. Jones, S. (1995a). Understanding community in the information age. In S. Jones (Ed.), 10-35.
65. Jones, S. (Ed.) (1995b). Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Jones, S. (Ed.) (1998). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67. Kendall, L. (1996). MUDder? I hardly know ‘er! Adventures of a feminist MUDder. In L. Cherny & E. R. Weise (Eds.), 207-223.
68. Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69. Kibby, M., & Costello, B. (2001). Between the image and the act: Interactive sex entertainment on the Internet. Sexualities: Studies in Culture and Society, 4(3), 353-269.
70. Ko, K-K. (1996). Structural characteristics of computer-mediated language: A comparative analysis of InterChange discourse. Electronic Journal of Communication, 6(3). Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v6n396.htm.
71. Kolko, B. (1995). Building a world with words: The narrative reality of virtual communities. Works and Days, 13(1/2), 105-126. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://acorn.grove.iup.edu/en/workdays/toc.html.
72. Kolko, B., & Reid, E. (1998). Dissolution and fragmentation: Problems in online communities. In S. Jones (Ed.), 212-229.
73. Korenman, J., & Wyatt, N. (1996). Group dynamics in an e-mail forum. In S. Herring (Ed.), 225-242.
74. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
75. Lambiase, J. (in press). Hanging by a thread: Topic development and death in an electronic discussion of the Oklahoma City bombing. In S. Herring (Ed.).
76. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Liu, G. Z. (1999). Virtual community presence in Internet Relay Chatting. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(1). Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/liu.html.
78. Livia, A. (in press). BSR ES TU F? Brevity and expressivity on the French Minitel. In S. Herring (Ed.).
79. Longacre, R. E. (1992). The discourse strategy of an appeals letter. In W. Mann & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text (pp. 109-130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
80. Longacre, R. E. (1996). The Grammar of Discourse, 2d ed. New York: Plenum.
81. Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. McLaughlin, M. L., Osborne, K. K., & Smith, C. B. (1995). Standards of conduct on Usenet. In S. Jones (Ed.), 90-111.
83. Millen, D. (2000). Community portals and collective goods: Conversation archives as an information resource. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved June 15, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://dlib.computer.org/conferen/hicss/0493/pdf/04933030.pdf.
84. Murray, D. E. (1985). Composition as conversation: The computer terminal as medium of communication. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in Nonacademic Settings (pp. 203-227). New York: Guilford.
85. Murray, D. E. (1988). The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switching. Language in Society, 17, 351-373.
86. Naper, I. (2001). System features of an inhabited 3D virtual environment supporting multimodality in communication. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved June 15, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.hic.ss.hawaii.edu/HICSS_34/PDFs/DDPTC10.pdf.
87. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
88. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000). Persistence and lurkers in discussion lists: A pilot study. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved June 15, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://dlib.computer.org/conferen/hicss/o493/pdf/04933031.pdf.
89. Panyametheekul, S. (2001). Disrupted adjacency and cohesion in Thai chat. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington.
90. Paolillo, J. (1996). Language choice on soc.culture.punjab. Electronic Journal of Communication, 6(3). Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v6n396.htm.
91. Paolillo, J. (2001). Language variation on Internet Relay Chat: A social network approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(2), 180-213.
92. Paolillo, J. (in press). Conversational codeswitching on Usenet and Internet Relay Chat. In S. Herring (Ed.).
93. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/.
95. Ravert, R. (2001). Adolescent chat style. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington.
96. Reid, E. M. (1991). Electropolis: Communication and Community on Internet Relay Chat. Senior Honors thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved December 31, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.aluluei.com/.
97. Reid, E. M. (1994). Cultural Formations in Text-Based Virtual Realities. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://home.earthlink.net/∼aluluei/cult-form.htm.
98. Reid, E. M. (1998). Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), 107-133.
99. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book/.
100. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
101. Sacks, H. (1984). On doing “being ordinary.” In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), 413-429.
102. Severinson Eklundh, K. (1986). Dialogue Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Study of Letters in the COM system. Linkoping Studies in Arts and Sciences 6. University of Linkoping.
103. Smith, M., & Kollock, P. (Eds.) (1999). Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
104. Soukup, C. (2000). Building a theory of multi-media CMC. New Media & Society, 2, 407-425.
105. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Tannen, D. (Ed.) (1993). Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
107. Voth, C. (1999). The Facts on FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions Documents on the Internet and Usenet. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
108. Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
109. Walther, J. (1999). Visual cues and computer-mediated communication: Don’t look before you leap. Retrieved December 31, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.rensselaer.edu/∼walthj/ica99.html.
110. Weber, H. L. (in press). Missed cues: How disputes can socialize virtual newcomers. In S. Herring (Ed.).
111. Wellman, B. (2001). Message posted to AIR-L@aoir.org, December 25, 2001.
112. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
113. Werry, C., & Mowbray, M. (Eds.) (2001). Online Communities: Commerce, Community Action, and the Virtual University. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
114. Yates, S. J. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In S. Herring (Ed.), 29-46.