The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 449-478

  Schwarz, Baruch B ^a   Glassner, Amnon ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Argumentation; E discussions and learning; Knowledge construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 36649012019     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-007-9024-2     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andriessen, J., Erkens, G., van de Laak, C., Peters, N., & Coirier, P. (2003). Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative writing. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 227-260). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing. The social organization of accounts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '97: The second international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 10-19). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4. Bell, P., & Linn, M. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797-817.
5. Bloch, M. (1949). Apologie pour l'histoire du métier d'historien. Paris: Armand Colin.
6. Burnett, R. E. (1993). Decision-making during the collaborative planning of co-authors. In A. Penrose & B. Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom (pp. 125-146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Cazden, C. B. (1995). Play with language and meta-linguistic awareness: One dimension of language experience. In J. S. Bruner (Ed.), Play-its role in development and evolution (pp. 603-608). New York: Penguin.
8. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
9. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. H. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington: American Psychological Association.
10. Colingwood, R. G. (1946). The idea of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Condon, S. L., & Cech, C. G. (1996). Discourse management strategies in face-to-face and computer-mediated decision making interactions. Electronic Journal of Communication/La revue électronique de communication, 6(3), http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v6n396.htm.
12. de Vries, E., Lund, C., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103.
13. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
14. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.
15. Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32(2/3), 135-153.
16. Glachan, M., & Light, P. (1982). Peer interaction and learning: Can two wrongs make a right? In G. Butterworth & P. Light (Eds.), Social cognition: Studies in the development of understanding (pp. 238-262). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Glassner, A., Weinstock, M., & Neuman, Y. (2005). Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 105-118.
18. Herring, S. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Rattay, C. (2000). Hypothesis-testing in science: Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 361-391.
20. Jackson, S. L., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1994). Making dynamic modeling accessible to precollege science students. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(3), 233-257.
21. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12(1), 1-8.
23. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287-315.
24. Marvin, L.-E. (1995). Spoof, spam, lurk and lag: the aesthetics of text-based virtual realities. The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue2/marvin.html.
25. Miller, M. (1987). Argumentation and cognition. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 225-249). Orlando, FL: Academic.
26. Muller Mirza, N., Tartas, V., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & de Pietro, J.-F. (2007). Using graphical tools in a phased activity for enhancing dialogical skills: An example with Digalo. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 247-272.
27. Murray, D. E. (1989). When the medium determines turns: Turn-taking in computer conversation. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Working with Language (pp. 251-266). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Pilkington, R., & Walker, A. (2003). Using CMC to develop argumentation skills in children with a 'literacy deficit'. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 144-175). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
29. Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3/4), 365-395.
30. Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993) Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3/4), 347-364.
31. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. S. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Cognition, perception and language (pp. 679-744). New York: Wiley.
33. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Archer, W., & Garrison, R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous computer conferencing transcripts. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
34. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
35. Sandoval, W. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51.
36. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 185-213.
37. Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2007). Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 225-246.
38. Schwarz, B. B., & de Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 297-313.
39. Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (2003). The blind and the paralytic: Fostering argumentation in everyday and scientific issues. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 227-260). Dodrecht: Kluwer.
40. Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (2007). Designing CSCL argumentative environments for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate. In R. Säljö (Ed.), Information and communication technology and the transformation of learning practices. London: Pergamon Press. In press.
41. Schwarz, B. B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and of argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction. The case of proportional reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), in press.
42. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., & Biezuner, S. (2000). Two "wrongs" may make a right.If they argue together! Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 461-494.
43. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity: An empirical study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 221-258.
44. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Toronto, ON: Wiley.
45. Stein, N. L., & Bernas, R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97-116). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
46. Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1993). The development of memory and reasoning skill in argumentative contexts: Evaluating, explaining, and generating evidence. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Studies in instructional psychology (Vol. IV) (pp. 285-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Suthers, D. D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 27-46). Dodrecht: Kluwer.
48. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219.
49. Suthers, D. D., & Weiner, A. (1995). Groupware for developing critical discussion skills. Retrieved from http://www-cscl95.indiana.edu/ suthers.html.
50. Toth, E., Suthers, D., & Lesgold, A. (2002). Mapping to know: The effects of evidence maps and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry skills. Science Education, 86(2), 264-286.
51. van Bruggen, J. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2003). Designing external representations to support solving wicked problems. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 177-204). Dodrecht: Kluwer.
52. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. S. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Enhancing learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers and Education, 34(2-3), 1-22.
54. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
55. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1-30.