A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach

Volumn 9780521830751, Issue , 2003, Pages 1-216

  Van Eemeren, Frans H ^a   Grootendorst, Rob ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926138794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511616389     Document Type: Book

References (17)

1. Albert, H. (1967/1975). Traktat ¨uber kritische Vernunft. 3rd ed. 1975. T¨ubingen: Mohr.
2. Cicero (1954). Rhetorica ad Herennium. H. Caplan (ed. and transl.), London: Heinemann. [Nowadays, Cicero is no longer seen as the author of the Rhetorica ad Herennium.
3. Cleary, J.W. & Haberman, F.W. (eds., 1964). Rhetoric and Public Address. A Bibliography 1947–1961. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Eemeren, F.H. van (ed., 2001). Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
5. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 431–440.
6. Eemeren, F.H. van & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Grice, P. (1989). Studies in theWay ofWords. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Hansen, H.V. & Pinto, R.C. (eds., 1995). Fallacies: Classical Background and Contemporary Developments. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
9. Jacobs, S. 1986. Dordrecht/Providence, RI: Foris Publications, 229–239.
10. Mill, J.S. (1863/1972). Utilitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government. Selections from Auguste Comte and Positivism. H.B. Acton (ed.). London: Dent.
11. Naess, A. (1966). Communication and Argument. Elements of Applied Semantics. London: Allen & Unwin. English translation of Om meningsytring. En del elementaere logiske emner (1947), Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
12. Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969) as The New Rhetoric.ATreatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press.
13. Pike, K. (1967). Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior.’s-Gravenhage: Mouton.
14. Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford Clarendon Press.
15. Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 65–80.
16. Walton, D.N. (1997a). Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority. University
17. Park, PA. The Pennsylvania State University Press.