Putting principles into practice: Understanding history

How Students Learn: History in the Classroom

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 31-77

  Lee, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014439180     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/11100     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Ashby, R. (1993). Pilot study on students' use of evidence. Unpublished study, Essex, England.
2. Ashby, R., and Lee, P.J. (1987). Children's concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers. London, England: Falmer Press.
3. Barca, I. (1997). Adolescent ideas about provisional historical explanation. (Portuguese translation for publishing at CEEP.) Braga, Portugal: Universidade do Minho.
4. Barton, K.C. (1996). Narrative simplifications in elementary students' historical thinking. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Teaching and learn-ing history, vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Barton, K.C. (1999). Best not to forget them: Positionality and students' ideas about significance in Northern Ireland. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
6. Barton, K.C. (2001). A sociocultural perspective on children's understanding of historical change: Comparative findings from Northern Ireland and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 881-891.
7. Berti, A.E. (1994). Children's understanding of the concept of the state. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Berti, A.E., and Andriolo, A. (2001). Third graders' understanding of core political concepts (law, nation-state, government) before and after teaching. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monograph, 127(4), 346-377.
9. Berti, A.E., and Bombi, A.S. (1988). The child's construction of economics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10. Berti, A.E., and Vanni, E. (2002). Italian children's understanding of war: A domain specific approach. Social Development, 9(4), 479-496.
11. Brophy, J., and VanSledright, B. (1997). Teaching and learning history in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Cercadillo, L. (2000). Significance in history: Students' ideas in England and Spain. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of London.
13. Cercadillo, L. (2001). Significance in history: Students' ideas in England and Spain. In A.K. Dickinson, P. Gordon, and P.J. Lee (Eds.), Raising standards in history education: International review of history education volume 3. Portland, OR: Woburn Press.
14. Delval, J. (1992). Stages in the child's construction of social knowledge. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Dickinson, A.K., and Lee, P.J. (1978). Understanding and research. In A.K. Dickinson and P.J. Lee (Eds.), History teaching and historical understanding (pp. 94-120). London, England: Heinemann.
16. Dickinson, A.K., and Lee, P.J. (1984). Making sense of history. In A. K. Dickinson, P.J. Lee, and P.J. Rogers (Eds.), Learning history (pp. 117-153). London, England: Heinemann.
17. Furnham, A. (1992). Young people's understanding of politics and economics. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 19, 25, 26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Halldén, O., (1994). Constructing the learning task in history instruction. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (p. 187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Lee, P. (2001). History in an information culture. International Journal of Historical Teaching Learning and Research, 1(2). Also available: http://www.ex.ac.uk/historyresource/journal2/journalstart.htm [Accessed January 14, 2003].
20. Lee, P.J., and Ashby, R. (1984). Making sense of the Second World War. Unpublished study of seventh grade students' historical explanations carried out in 1984 in Essex, England. Data were collected using video recordings of groups of three students discussing possible explanations, with no adults present, University of London Institute of Education.
21. Lee, P.J., and Ashby, R. (1998). History in an information culture. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Di-ego, CA.
22. Lee, P.J., and Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among stu-dents ages 7-14. In P.N. Stearns, P. Seixas, and S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history. New York: University Press.
23. Lee, P.J., and Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, perspective taking and rational understand-ing. In O.L. Davis Jr., S. Foster, and E. Yaeger (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
24. Lee, P.J., Dickinson, A.K., and Ashby, R. (1996a). Progression in children's ideas about history. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Progression in learning. Bristol, PA: Multilin-gual Matters.
25. Lee, P.J., Dickinson, A.K., and Ashby, R. (1996b). Research carried out by Project CHATA (Concepts of history and teaching approaches), funded by the Eco-nomic and Social Research Council, Essex, England, 1991-1996.
26. Lee, P.J., Dickinson, A.K., and Ashby, R. (1997). "Just another emperor": Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 233-244.
27. Lee, P.J., Dickinson, A.K., and Ashby, R. (1998). Researching children's ideas about history. In J.F. Voss and M. Carretero (Eds), International review of history edu-cation: Learning and reasoning in history, vol. 2. Portland, OR: Woburn Press.
28. Levstik, L., (2002). Two kinds of empathy: Reasoned analysis and emotional response in historical thinking. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
29. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30. Martin, R. (1989). The past within us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Penuel, W.R., and Wertsch, J. (1998). Historical representation as mediated action: Official history as a tool. In J.F. Voss and M. Carretero (Eds.), International review of history education: Learning and reasoning in history, vol. 2. Portland, OR: Woburn Press.
32. Seixas, P. (1993). Popular film and young people's understanding of the history of Native-white relations, The History Teacher, 3(May), 351-370.
33. Shemilt, D. (1980). History 13-16 evaluation study. Edinburgh, Scotland: Holmes McDougall.
34. Shemilt, D. (1983). The devil's locomotive. History and Theory, XXII(4), 1-18.
35. Shemilt, D. (1984). Beauty and the philosopher: Empathy in history and the classroom. In A.K. Dickinson, P.J. Lee, and P.J. Rogers (Eds.), Learning history. London, England: Heinemann.
36. Shemilt, D. (1987). Adolescent ideas about evidence and methodology in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers. London, England: Falmer Press.
37. Shemilt, D. (1994). Unpublished research, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
38. Shemilt, D. (2000). The Caliph's coin: The currency of narrative frameworks in history teaching. In P.N. Stearns, P. Seixas, and S. Wineberg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history. New York: University Press.
39. Southern, R.W. (1953). The making of the Middle Ages. New Haven, CT: Yale Univer-sity Press.
40. Thomas, J. (1993). How students aged 16-19 learn to handle different interpretations of the past. Unpublished study, University of London Institute of Education, 1990-1993.
41. Torney-Purta, J. (1992). Dimensions of adolescents' reasoning about political and historical issues: Ontological switches, developmental processes, and situated learning. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional pro-cesses in history and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates.
42. Walsh, P. (1992). History and love of the past. In P. Lee, J. Slater, P. Walsh, and J. White (Eds.), The aims of school history: The national curriculum and beyond. London, England: Tufnell Press.
43. Wertsch, J.V., and Rozin, M. (1998). The Russian revolution: Official and unofficial accounts. In J.F. Voss and M. Carretero (Eds.), International review of history education: Learning and reasoning in history, vol. 2. London, England: Woburn Press.
44. Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the inter-pretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319-346.
45. Wineburg, S. (2000). Making historical sense. In P.N. Stearns, P. Seixas, and S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history. New York: New York Univer-sity Press.
46. Wineburg, S., and Fournier, J. (1994). Contextualized thinking in history. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.