Productive failure

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 379-424

  Kapur, Manu ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46849100254     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370000802212669     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
2. Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). Dynamics of complex systems. New York: Perseus Publishing.
3. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301-329.
5. Bransford, J. D., & Nitsch, K. E. (1978). Coming to understand things we could not previously understand. In J. F. Kavanaugh and W. Strange (Eds.), Speech and language in the laboratory, school, arid clinic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational ResearcHer, 18(1), 32-42.
7. Chatterji, M. (2003). Designing and using tools for educational assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.
9. Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.
10. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
11. Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem, solving. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22.
12. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
13. Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Abram, P. L., Scarloss, B. A., & Schultz, S. E. (2002). Can groups learn? Teachers College Record, 104(6), 1045-1068.
14. Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC/Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press/MIT Press.
15. Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., Prangsma, M., & Jaspers, J. (2003). Computer support for collaborative and argumentative writing. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 157-176). Amsterdam.: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.
16. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405-41.
17. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information arid structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
18. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.
19. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395-429.
20. Goldstone, R. L. (2006). The complex systems see-change in education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 35-43.
21. Goldstone, R. L., & Janssen, M. A. (2005). Computational models of collective behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 424-429.
22. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34.
23. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Towards a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
24. Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. I. (2001). Communication patterns in. computer-mediated vs. face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(1), 35-52.
25. Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. (2007). The effect of problem type on collaborative problem solving in a synchronous computer-mediated environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 55(5), 439-459.
26. Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. (2007). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers and Education, 51, 54-66.
27. Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Ki, W. W., & Marton, F. (2003). Learning Cantonese tones. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padova, Italy.
29. Ki, W. W., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning Cantonese tones II. Unpublished manuscript.
30. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
31. Koschmann, T., Suthers, D. D., & Chan, T. W. (2005). Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years! Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Lam, S. K. (1997). The effects of group decision support systems and task structures on group communication and decision quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 193-215.
33. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62.
34. Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 499-535.
35. McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 51-62.
36. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text, coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43.
37. Mestre, J. P. (2005). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
38. Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communications Research, 22(1), 90-127.
39. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
41. Roschelle, J. (1996). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 209-248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Ross, S. M. (1996). Stochastic processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
43. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
44. Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2005). The impact of role assignment as a scripting tool on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 557-566). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475-522.
46. Schwartz, D., Lin, X. D., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In C. M. Reigeluth (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 183-214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184.
48. Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
49. Spada, H., Meier, A., Rummel, N., & Hauser, S. (2005). A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 622-631). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In V. Patel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in. computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 79-90.
52. Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315-337.
54. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219.
55. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
56. VanLehn, K. (1999). Rule learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: An evaluation of cascade. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(1), 71-125.
57. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 209-249.
58. Voss, J. F. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning in ill-structured domains. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 74-93). London: Sage Publications.
59. Voss, J. F. (2005). Toulmin's model and the solving of ill-structured problems. Argumentation, 19, 321-329.
60. Wampold, B. E. (1992). The intensive examination of social interaction. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 93-13.1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.