Two Minds, One Dialog: Coordinating Speaking and Understanding

Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory

Volumn 53, Issue C, 2010, Pages 301-344

  Brennan, Susan E ^a   Galati, Alexia ^a   Kuhlen, Anna K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85053741469     PISSN: 00797421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53008-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (150)

1. Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., & Harnish, R. M. (1987). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 502–518.
3. Arnold, J. E., Hudson-Kam, C. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh—you’re describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 914–930.
4. Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R., & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 578–581.
5. Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 1–22.
6. Bard, E. G., & Aylett, M. (2000). Accessibility, duration, and modeling the listener in spoken dialogue. In: Proceedings of Gotalog 2000, 4th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Gotalog, Sweden: Gothenburg University.
7. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391–418.
8. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 497–507.
9. Bekkering, H., de Bruijn, E. R. A., Cuijpers, R. H., Newman-Norlund, R., van Schie, H. T., & Meulenbroek, R. (2009). Joint action: Neurocognitive mechanisms supporting human interaction. Topics in Cognitive Science (Special Issue on Joint Action), 1, 340–352.
10. Bortfeld, H., & Brennan, S. E. (1997). Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non-native speakers. Discourse Processes, 23, 119–147.
11. Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–B25.
12. Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 43, 89–98.
13. Brass, M., Zysset, S., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). The inhibition of imitative response tendencies. NeuroImage, 14, 1416–1423.
14. Brennan, S. E. (1990). Speaking and providing evidence for mutual understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
15. Brennan, S. E. (1991). Conversation with and through computers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1, 67–86.
16. Brennan, S. E. (1995). Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 137–167.
17. Brennan, S. E. (2004). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (pp. 95–129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2007). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465–1477.
19. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1482–1493.
20. Brennan, S. E., & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialogue. Topics in Cognitive Science (Special Issue on Joint Action), 1, 274–291.
21. Brennan, S. E., & Kipp, E. G. (1996). An addressee’s knowledge affects a speaker’s use of fillers in question-answering. In: Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 37th Annual Meeting (p. 24), Chicago, IL.
22. Brennan, S. E., Kuhlen, A. K., & Ratra, B. (2010). Audience design in answering rhetorical versus sincere questions (in preparation).
23. Brennan, S. E., & Ohaeri, J. O. (1999). Why do electronic conversations seem less polite? The costs and benefits of hedging. In: Proceedings, International Joint Conference on Work Activities, Coordination, and Collaboration (WACC’99) (pp. 227–235), San Francisco, CA: ACM.
24. Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274–296.
25. Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 383–398.
26. Brown, P. M., & Dell, G. S. (1987). Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 441–472.
27. Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 893–900.
28. Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122–1134.
29. Cahn, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (1999). A psychological model of grounding and repair in dialog. In: Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems (pp. 25–33), North Falmouth, MA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
30. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 1–62.
32. Ciaramidaro, A., Adenzato, M., Enrici, I., Erk, S., Pia, L., Bara, B. G., et al. (2007). The intentional network: How the brain reads varieties of intentions. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3105–3113.
33. Clark, H. H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Clark, H. H. (1994). Managing problems in speaking. Speech Communication, 15, 243–250.
35. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
36. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: APA Reprinted in R. M. Baecker (Ed.), Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work: Assisting human–human collaboration (pp. 222–233). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
37. Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance, Vol. IX (pp. 313–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111.
39. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.
40. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
41. Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 292–314.
42. Dell, G. S., & Brown, P. M. (1991). Mechanisms for listener-adaptation in language production: Limiting the role of the ‘Model of the Listener’. In D. Napoli & J. Kegl (Eds.), Bridges between psychology and linguistics: A Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman (pp. 105–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.
44. Don, A., Brennan, S., Laurel, B., & Schneiderman, B. (1992). Anthropomorphism: From Eliza to Terminator 2. In: Proceedings, CHI’92, Human Factors in Computing Systems, Monterey, CA (pp. 67–70).
45. DuBois, J. (1974). Syntax in mid-sentence. In C. Fillmore, G. Lakoff, & R. Lakoff (Eds.), Berkeley studies in syntax and semantics, Vol. 1 (pp. III.1–III.25). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
46. Eden, M. (1983). Cybernetics. In F. Machlup & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages (pp. 409–439). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
47. Ekeocha, J. O., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). Collaborative recall in face-to-face and electronic groups. Memory, 16, 245–261.
48. Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers signaling ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489–504.
49. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 509–525.
50. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1991). Accuracy and bias in estimates of others’ knowledge. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 445–454.
51. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378–391.
52. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 361–377.
53. Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2010a). Attenuating information in spoken communication: For the speaker, or for the addressee? Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 35–51.
54. Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2010b). Audience design in the production of gesture (under review).
55. Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77–83.
56. Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A. I., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage, 16, 814–821.
57. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501.
58. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech styles and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
60. Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R., & Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 333–342.
61. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
62. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388.
63. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation (from the William James lectures, Harvard University, 1967). In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
64. Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers’ eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 596–615.
65. Hanna, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105–115.
66. Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43–61.
67. Harding, C. (1982). Development of the intention to communicate. Human Development, 25, 140–151.
68. Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? Memory, 16, 213–230.
69. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208–216.
70. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659–671.
71. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Speaker’s experiences and audience design: Knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 589–606.
72. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005a). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes, 40, 1–35.
73. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005b). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96, 127–142.
74. Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91–117.
75. Hwang, J., Brennan, S. E., & Huffman, M. K. (2007). How non-native speakers make phonetic adjustments to partners in dialogue. In: Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 48th Annual Meeting (p. 88 ), Long Beach, CA.
76. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.
77. Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47–96.
78. Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137–194.
79. Kampe, K. K. W., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2003). ‘‘Hey John’’: Signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with ‘‘menta-lizing’’, regardless of modality. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5258–5263.
80. Keysar, B. (1997). Unconfounding common ground. Discourse Processes, 24, 253–270.
81. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32–38.
82. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1–20.
83. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric bias of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 46–50.
84. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96–123.
85. Krach, S., Blümel, I., Marjoram, D., Lataster, T., Krabbendam, L., Weber, J., et al. (2009). Are women better mindreaders? Sex differences in neural correlates of mentalizing detected with functional MRI. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 9.
86. Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., & Kircher, T. (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS ONE, 3, e2597.
87. Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Using prosody and optional words to disambiguate utterances: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50, 194–231.
88. Krauss, R. M. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81–98.
89. Kraut, R. E., Lewis, S. H., & Swezey, L. W. (1982). Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 718–731.
90. Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D. J. (2007). Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 436–455.
91. Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). Addressees shape speaking: When confederates may be hazardous to your data. In: Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 49th Annual Meeting (p. 6), Chicago, IL.
92. Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2010). Anticipating distracted addressees: How speakers’ expectations and addressees’ feedback influence storytelling. Discourse Processes, (in press).
93. Kuhlen, A. K., Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2010). Gesturing integrates top-down and bottom-up information: Effects of speakers’ expectations and addressees’ feedback (under review).
94. Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the ‘‘semi-permeable’’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
95. Levelt, W. J. M., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
96. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.
97. Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of context on the intelligibility of hearing and deaf children’s speech. Language and Speech, 24, 255–264.
98. Lockridge, C. B., & Brennan, S. E. (2002). Addressees’ needs influence speakers’ early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 550–557.
99. MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157–201.
100. MacKay, D. M. (1983). The wider scope of information theory. In F. Machlup & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages (pp. 485–492). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
101. Matthews, D. E., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2008). What’s in a manner of speaking? Children’s sensitivity to partner-specific referential precedents. In: Proceedings of the LONDIAL Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialog, London, UK.
102. McAllister, J., Potts, A., Mason, K., & Marchant, G. (1994). Word duration in monologue and dialogue speech. Language and Speech, 37, 393–405.
103. Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects in the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 201–213.
104. Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. S. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s online reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329–336.
105. Neider, M. B., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Brennan, S. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2005). Sharing eyegaze is better than speaking in a time-critical consensus task. In: Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 46th Annual Meeting (p. 72), Toronto, Canada.
106. Newman-Norlund, R. D., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A. M. J., & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 817–818.
107. Noordzij, M. L., Newman-Norlund, S. E., de Ruiter, J. P., Hagoort, P., Levinson, S. C., & Toni, I. (2009). Brain mechanisms underlying human communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1–13.
108. Nooteboom, S. G. (1991). Perceptual goals of speech production. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aix-en-Provence, France, August 19–24 (pp. 107–110), Vol. 1.
109. Norman, D. A. (2002). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
110. Perryman, G. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2009). Effects of multiple speakers (copresent or not) on dialog context. In: Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 50th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA .
111. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 167–226.
112. Polichak, J. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (1998). Common ground and everyday language use: Comments on Horton and Keysar (1996). Cognition, 66, 183–189.
113. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor—A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–297). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
114. Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. NeuroImage, 22, 1694–1703.
115. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
116. Samuel, S. G., & Troicki, M. (1998). Articulation quality is inversely related to redundancy when children or adults have verbal control. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 175–194.
117. Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in ‘‘theory of mind’’ NeuroImage, 19, 1835–1842.
118. Schober, M. F. (1998). Conversational evidence for rethinking meaning. Social Research, 65, 511–534.
119. Schober, M. F. (2004). Just how aligned are interlocutors’ representations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 209–210.
120. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211–232.
121. Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind’. Mind & Language, 14, 131–153.
122. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 70–76.
123. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2008). From mirroring to joint action. In I. Wachsmuth, M. Lenzen, & G. Knoblich (Eds.), Embodied communication (pp. 129–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
124. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353–367.
125. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
126. Shatz, M., & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, 1–38.
127. Shockley, K., Richardson, D., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 305–319.
128. Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 25–38.
129. Stellmann, P., & Brennan, S. E. (1993). Flexible perspective-setting in conversation. In: Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 34th Annual Meeting (p. 20), Washington, DC.
130. Suda, M., Takei, Y., Aoyama, Y., Narita, K., Sato, T., Fukuda, M., et al. (2010). Fronto-polar activation during face-to-face conversation: An in situ study using near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuropsychologia, 48, 441–447.
131. Swerts, M., & Krahmer, E. (2005). Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 81–94.
132. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
133. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition, Vol. 11: Speech language and communication. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
134. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). Eye movements as a tool for bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions (pp. 3–37). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
135. Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Buitelaar, J. K., Petersson, K. M., van der Gaag, R. J., Kan, C. C., Tendolkar, I., et al. (2009). Neural correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in autism spectrum disorders. Brain, 132, 1941–1952.
136. Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Petersson, K. M., van Berkum, J. J. A., van den Brink, D., Buitelaar, J. K., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2085–2099.
137. Van Berkum, J. J. A., van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580–591.
138. Van der Cruyssen, L., Van Duynslaeger, M., Cortoos, A., & Van Overwalle, F. (2009). ERP time course and brain areas of spontaneous and intentional goal inferences. Social Neuroscience, 4, 165–184.
139. Van Duynslaeger, M., Van Overwalle, F., & Verstraeten, E. (2007). Electrophysiological time course and brain areas of spontaneous and intentional trait inferences. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 174–188.
140. Van Leeuwen, M. L., van Baaren, R. B., Martin, D., Dijksterhuis, A., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Executive functioning and imitation: Increasing working memory load facilitates behavioural imitation. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3265–3270.
141. Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48, 564–584.
142. Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happe, F., Falkai, P., et al. (2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self perspective. NeuroImage, 14, 170–181.
143. Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175.
144. Wiener, N. (1965). Cybernetics—or control and communication in the animal and the machine (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (originally published in 1948).
145. Wiley, J., & Bailey, J. (2006). Effects of collaboration and argumentation on learning from web pages. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 297–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Wiley, J., & Jensen, M. (2006). When three heads are better than two. In: Proceedings, CogSci 2006, 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 3275), Vancouver, CA: Cognitive Science Society.
147. Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Collaborative processes of language use in conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
148. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
149. Wright, D. B., & Klumpp, A. (2004). Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1080–1083.
150. Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In: Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 567–578), Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Institute.