Writing from primary documents a way of knowing in history

Written Communication

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 25-68

  Mccarthy, Kathleen ^a   Leinhardt, Young Gaea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002432133     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088398015001002     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ackennan, J. M. (1991). Reading, writing, and knowing: The role of disciplinary knowledge in comprehension and composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 133-178.
2. Ackerman, J. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10(3), 334-370.
3. American Federation of Teachers (AFT). (1996). High standards, American style: Broadening access to AP courses is something we can do now. American Educator, 20(1), 4041.
4. Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5. Applebee, A. N. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 577-596.
6. Applebee, A. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school (NCTE Research Report No. 25). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
7. Bailyn, B. (1994). On the teaching and writing of history: Responses to a series of questions. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
8. Ball, C C, Dice, L., & Bartholomae, D. (1990). Telling secrets: Student readers and disciplinary authorities. In R. Beach &S. Hynds (Eds.), Advances in discourse processes: Vol. 39. Developing discourse practices in adolescetice and adulthood (pp. 337-358). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other process problems (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford.
10. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. -F., Georgi, M. C, & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Learning from history texts: From causal analysts to argument models. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 47-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Cook, A. (1988). History/writing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
14. Durst, R. K. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(4), 347-76.
15. Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122-128.
16. Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41,19-37.
17. Flower, L. (1990). The role of task representation in reading-to-write. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, P. Kantz, K. McCormick, & W. Peck (Eds.), Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 35-75). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
19. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Flower, L., Stein, V, Ackerman, J., Kantz, M. J., McCormick, K., & Peck, W. C (Eds.). (1990). Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Fulwiler, X, & Young, A. (Eds.). (1982). Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
22. Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: An introduction. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5-17.
23. Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Gère, A. R. (Ed.). (1985). Roots in the sawdust. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
25. Greene, S. (1993). The role of task in the development of academic thinking through reading and writing in a college history course. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 46-75.
26. Greene, S. (1994). Students as authors in the study of history. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 137-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Herrington, A., & Moran, C. (Eds.). (1992). Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
29. Holt, T. (1990). Thinking historically: Narrative, imagination, and understanding. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
30. Joliff e, D. A., & Brier, E. M. (1988). Studying writer 's knowledge in academic disciplines. In D. A. Joliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research Vol. 2. Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 35-87). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31. Langer, J. A. (1984). The effects of available information on responses to school writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 27-43.
32. Langer, J. A. (1992). Speaking of knowing: Conceptions of understanding in academic disciplines (pp. 69-85). In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
33. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
34. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35. Leinhardt, G. (1993a). Instructional explanations in history and mathematics. In W. Kintsch (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 5-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Leinhardt, G. (1993b). Weaving instructional explanations in history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63,46-74.
37. Leinhardt, G. (1994). History: A time to be mindful. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 209-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Leinhardt, G. (1995, May). Paul's twice, Paul's pen: Learning to reason in history. Paper presented at the Tanner Symposium on Memory, Representation, and Culture, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
39. Leinhardt, G., Stainton, C, & Virji, S. M. (1994). A sense of history. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 79-88.
40. Leinhardt, G., Stainton, C, Virji, S. M., & Odoroff, E. (1994). Learning to reason in history: Mindlessness to mindfulness. In M. Carretaro & J. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 131-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Issues of distance and expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441-486.
42. Marshall, J. D. (1987). The effects of writing on students' understanding of literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 21,30-63.
43. McCutchen, D. (1984). Writing as a linguistic problem. Educational Psychologist, 14(4), 226-238.
44. McGinley, W, & Tiemey, R. J. (1989). Traversing the topical landscape: Reading and writing as ways of knowing. Written Communication, 6(3), 243-269.
45. Meyer, B.J.E (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text (pp. 11-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Newell, G. E. (1984). Learning from writing in two content areas: Acase study/protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(3), 265-287.
47. Newell, G. E. (1994). The effects of written between-draft responses on students' reasoning about literature. Written Communication, 11(3), 311-47.
48. Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257-281.
49. Olson, D. R., & Torrance, N. (1981). Learning to meet the requirements of written text: Language development in the school years. In C. H. Fredericksen & J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication: Vol. 2. Process, development, and communication (pp. 235-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Penrose, A. M. (1992). To write or not to write: Effects of task and task interpretation on learning through writing. Written Communication, 9,465-500.
51. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. -F., Georgi, M. C, & Mason, R. A. (1994). How students use texts to leam and reason about historical uncertainty. In M. Carretaro & J. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 257-283). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Rothschild, E. (1995). Aspiration, performance, reward: The Advanced Placement Program at 40. College Board Review, 176-77,24-32.
54. Russell, D. (1992). American origins of the writing-across-the-curriculum movement. In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines (pp. 22-44). New York: The Modem Language Association of America.
55. Scardamalia, M, & Bereiter, C. (1984). Development of strategies in text processing. In H. Mandl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 379-406). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1985). Development of dialectical processes in writing. In D. Olsen, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 307-329). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied linguistics: Reading, writing, and language teaming (pp. 142-175). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
58. Schama, S. (1991, September 8). Clio has a problem. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 29-33.
59. Smagorinsky, P. (1995). Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualizing writing across the curriculum as composing across the curriculum. American Journal of Education, 103,160-184.
60. Sperling, M. (1996). Revisiting the writing-speaking connection: Challenges for research on writing and writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 66,53-86.
61. Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7,256-267.
62. Spivey, N. N., & King, J. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24,1-14.
63. Stockton, S. (1995). Writing in history: Narrating the subject of time. Written Communication, 12(1), 47-73.
64. Walvoord, B. E., & Breihan, J. R. (1990). Arguing and debating: Breihan's history course. In B. E. Walvoord & L. P. McCarthy (Eds.), Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines (pp. 97-143). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
65. Walvoord, B. E., & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and ivriting in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
66. Wineburg, S. (1991a). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83,73-87.
67. Wineburg, S. (1991b). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Jountal, 28,495-519.
68. Wineburg, S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 85-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69. Wïneburg, S., & Wilson, S. M. (1991). Subject matter knowledge in the teaching of history. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers' subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (pp. 305-347). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
70. Witte, S. P. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9(2), 237-308.
71. Young, K. M. (1996). teaming between the lines: An account of an apprenticeship in poetry (Technical Report No. CLIP-96-03). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
72. Young, K. M., & Leinhardt, G. (in press). Wildflowers, sheep, and democracy: The role of analogy in the teaching and learning of history. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretaro (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history. London: Wobum.