Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, CSCL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 717-726

  Weinberger, Armin ^a   Fischer, Frank ^a   Stegmann, Karsten ^b  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Argumentative knowledge construction; Computer supported collaboration scripts

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATIVE KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATION SCRIPTS; DISTRIBUTED GROUPS; DOMAIN-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE; EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; HIGHER EDUCATION; KNOW-HOW;

EID: 84858422309     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema- theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (255-291). New York: Longman.
2. Andriessen, J. E. B., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen & M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computersupported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193. (Pubitemid 127107956)
5. Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, (pp. 10-19). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6. Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, n., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
7. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120.
8. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
9. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
10. Hoppe, H. U., Gaßner, K., Mühlenbrock, M., & Tewissen, F. (2000). Distributed visual language environments for cooperation and learning. Journal Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 3, 205-220.
11. Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. J., & Carr, C. S. (Eds.). (2003). Visualizing argumentation. Software tools for collaborative and educational sense making. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. (2003). Cooperation scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. In B. Wasson & R. Baggetun & U. Hoppe & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning - CSCL 2003, COMMUNITY EVENTS - Communication and Interaction (pp. 59-60). Bergen, Norway: InterMedia.
13. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 3, 287-315. (Pubitemid 127341610)
15. Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
16. Linn, M. C., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). WISE science. Educational Leadership, 29-32.
17. Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29, 127-153.
18. Nussbaum, E. M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G. M., Reynolds, R. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (2002, April). Enhancing the quality of on-line discussions. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
19. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of problem-based learning: some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27, 422-432. (Pubitemid 23323682)
21. Stein, N. L., & Bernas, R. S. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97-116). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
22. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg & A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 577-592). Maastricht, NL: University of Maastricht.
23. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich. Available at: http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/00001120/01/Weinberger-Armin.pdf.
25. Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (in press). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education.
26. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30. (Pubitemid 40317592)
27. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.