Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge

Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 127-144

  Baker, Michael ^a  

^a INSTITUT TELECOM   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Collaboration; Conceptual change; Dialogue; Learning; Meaning; Negotiation; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956120029     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Baker, M.J. (1996). Argumentation et co-construction des connaissances. [Argumentation and co-construction of knowledge]. Interaction et Cognitions, 2 (3), 157-191 .
2. Baker, M.J. (1999). Argumentation and Constructive Interaction. In J. Andriessen, P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of Argumentative text processing (pp. 179-202). Amsterdam; Amsterdam University press.
3. Baker, M.J. (2000a). Les attitudes et leurs révisions dans le dialogue: le cas de la résolution coopérative de problèmes. [Attitudes and their revisions in dialogue: the case of cooperative problem solving]. Psychologie de l'Interaction, 11-12, 229-265.
4. Baker M.J. (2000b). Explication, argumentation et négociation: analyse d'un corpus de dialogues en langue naturelle écrite dans le domaine de la médecine. [Explanation, argumentation and negotiation: analysis of a corpus of natural-language dialgogues in the domain of medecine]. Psychologie de l'Interaction, 9-10, 179-210.
5. Baker, M.J. (2002). Argumentative interactions, discursive operations and learning to model in science. In P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning, A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The Role of Communication in Learning to Model (pp. 303-324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
6. Baker, M.J. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen, M.J. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments (pp. 47-78). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers .
7. Baker, M.J., Quignard, M., Lund, K., Séjourné, A. (2003). Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp. 11-20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers .
8. Barth, E.M., Krabbe, E.C.W. (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter .
9. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13 (2), 145-182 .
10. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge .
11. Doise, W., Mugny, G. (1981). Le développement social de l'intelligence. [ The social development of intelligence ]. Paris: InterÉditions .
12. Edwards, D. (1993). But what do children really think?: discourse analysis and conceptual content in children's talk. Cognition and Instruction, 11 (3 & 4), 207-225 .
13. Grize, J.-B. (1996). Logique naturelle et communications. [ Natural logic and communications ]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France .
14. Guerrini, J.-C., Majcherczak, E. (1999). L'argumentation au pluriel: polyphonie, valeurs, points de vue. [ Argumentation in the plural: polyphony, values and viewpoints ]. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon .
15. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990). Les interactions verbales, tome 1. [ Verbal interactions, volume 1 ]. Paris: Armand Colin.
16. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
17. Meyer, M. (1982). Logique, langage et argumentation. [ Logic, language and argumentation ]. Paris: Hachette Université .
18. Muntig, P., Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 225-256 . (Pubitemid 128176967)
19. Naess, A. (1966). En del elementaere logiske emner. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1947.
20. (Communication and argument. Elements of applied semantics). London: Allen and Unwin .
21. Nonnon, E. (1996). Activités argumentatives et élaboration de connaissances nouvelles: le dialogue comme espace d'exploration. [Argumentative activities and elaboration of new knowledge]. Langue Française, 112, 67-87 .
22. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958/1988). Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. [ A treatise on argumentation: the new rhetoric ]. Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles .
23. Perret-Clermont, A.N. (1979, 5e édition 2000). La construction de l'intelligence dans l'interaction sociale. [ The construction of intelligence in social interaction ]. Berne: Éditions Peter Lang. (Social interaction and cognitive development. Academic press, 1980).
24. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Perret, J.-F., Bell, N. (1991). The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 41-62). Washington DC: American Psychological Association .
25. Quignard, M. (2000). Modélisation cognitive de l'argumentation dialoguée: étude de dialogues d'élèves en résolution de problème de sciences physiques. [Cognitive modelling of argumentation in dialogue: a study of students' dialogues in physics problem-solving]. PhD thesis, Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble I, spécialité Sciences Cognitives.
26. Stein, N.L., Bernas, R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In G. Rijlaarsdam, E. Espéret (Series Eds.), J. Andriessen, P. Coirier (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 5. Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing (pp. 97-116). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press .
27. Tiberghien, A. (1996). Construction of prototypical situations in teaching the concept of energy. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, P. Scott (Eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe (pp. 100-114). London: Falmer Press .
28. Trognon, A. (1993). How does the process of interaction work when two interlocutors try to resolve a logical problem?. Cognition and Instruction, 11 (3 & 4), 325-345 .
29. Trognon, A. (1999). Éléments d'analyse interlocutoire. [Elements of interlocutionary analysis]. In M. Gilly, J.-P. Roux, A. Trognon (Eds.), Apprendre dans l'interaction [ Learning in Interaction ] (pp. 69-94). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy .
30. Trognon, A., Batt, M. (2003). Comment représenter le passage de l'intersubjectif à l'intrasubjectif? Essai de Logique Interlocutoire. [How should the transition from the intersubjective to the intrasubjective be represented? An essay in interlocutionary logic]. L'Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 32 (3), 399-436 .
31. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
32. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
33. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language. A. Kozulin (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
34. Walton, D.N. (1989). Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
35. Walton, D.N. (1992). Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation. New York: State University of New York Press .
36. Webb, N.M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Education Research, 13 (1), 21-38 .