Emergent learning in successive activities: Learning in interaction in a laboratory context

Pragmatics and Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-87

  Schwarz, Baruch ^a   Perret Clermont, Anne Nelly ^b   Trognon, Alain ^c,d   Marro, Pascale ^d,e  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d University of Fribourg ^*  (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Conceptual development; Emergent learning; Interlocutory analysis; Learning in interaction; Proportional reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 43549087617     PISSN: 09290907     EISSN: 15699943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/pc.16.1.05sch     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Carraher, D. and Schhemann, A.D. 2002. The transfer dilemma. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 11(1): 1-24.
2. Cobb, P. and Bowers, J. 1999. Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher 28(2): 4-15.
3. Gilly, M., Roux, J-P., and Trognon, A. (eds). 1999. Apprendre dans l'interaction. Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
4. Greeno, J.G. 1997. On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher 26(1): 5-17.
5. Greeno, J.G. and TMSMTAPG. 1998. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist 53: 5-26.
6. Harel, G., Behr, M., Post, T., and Lesh, R. 1992. The Blocks task: Comparative analyses of the task with other proportion tasks and qualitative reasoning skills of seven-grade children in solving tasks. Cognition and Instruction 9: 45-96.
7. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., and Wearne, D. 1996. Problem-solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: the case of mathematics. Educational Researcher 25(4): 12-21.
8. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., and Rattray, C. 2000. Hypothesis-testing in scien Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10: 361-391.
9. Inbelder, B. and Piaget, J. 1958. The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. Trans. A. Parsons and S. Milgram. New York: Basic Books.
10. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., and Felton, M. 1997. Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction 15: 287-315.
11. Noelting, G. 1992. The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept. Part I-Differentiation of stages. In L. Smith (ed), Jean Piaget, Critical Assessment. London: Routledge.
12. Pain, S. 1981/1985. Les Difficultés d'Apprentissage, Diagnostic et Traitement. Berne: Peter Lang.
13. Pain, S. 1985/1989. La Fonction de l'ignorance. Berne: Peter Lang.
14. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. 1993. What it is that develops? Cognition and Instruction 13 (3&4): 197-205.
15. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., and Carugati, F. 2001. Learning and instruction, social-cognitive perspectives. In N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (8586-8588). Oxford: Pergamon.
16. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., and Carugati, F. 2004. Des psychologues sociaux étudient l'apprentissage. In G. Chatelanat, C. Moro, and M. Saada-Robert (eds), Unité et Pluralité des Sciences de l'éducation. Berne: Peter Lang, 159-183.
17. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. and Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L. 1989. Social factors in learning and instruction: Towards an integrative perspective. International Journal of Educational Research 13(6): 575-580.
18. Resnick, L.B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C.M., Wathen, S.H., and Holowchak, M. 1993. Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction 11(3&4): 347-364.
19. Roschelle, J. 1992. Learning by collaboration: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3: 235-276.
20. Schwarz, B.B., Neuman, Y., and Biezuner, S. 2000. Two wrongs may make a right... If they argue together! Cognition and Instruction 18(4): 461-494.
21. Schwarz, B.B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., and Ilya, M. 2003. Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity: An empirical study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(2): 221-258.
22. Schwarz, B.B., and Linchevski, L. 2007. The role of task design and argumentation during peer interaction: The case of proportional reasoning. Learning and Instruction 17(5): 510-531.
23. Siegler, R.S. 1976. Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology 8: 481-520.
24. Siegler, R.S. 2004. Learning about learning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 50(3): 353-368.
25. Siegler, R.S. and Svetina, M. 2002. A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development 73: 793-809.
26. Siegler, R.S. and Vago, S. 1978. The development of a proportionality concept: Judging relative fullness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 25: 371-395.
27. Trognon, A. 1999. Eléments d'analyse interlocutoire. In M. Gilly, J-P. Roux, and A. Trognon (eds), Apprendre dans l'interaction. Presses Universitaires de Nancy, 69-94.
28. Trognon, A., Batt, M., Schwarz, B.B., Perret-Clermont, A.N., and Marro, P. 2006. Logique interlocutoire de la résolution en dyade d'un problème arithmétique. Psychologie Française 51: 171-187.
29. Vanderveken, D. 1990. Meaning and Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.