Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 456-496

  Kuhn, Deanna ^a   Zillmer, Nicole ^a   Crowell, Amanda ^a   Zavala, Julia ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890047251     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2013.830618     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 485-521.
2. Anderson, R., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition & Instruction, 19, 1-46.
3. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
4. Asterhan, C., & Schwarz, B. (2007). The effects of dialogical and monological argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626-639.
5. Asterhan, C., & Schwarz, B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science, 33, 374-400.
6. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Berland, L., & McNeill, K. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94, 765-793.
8. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2011). Argumentation and reasoning in life and in school: Implications for the design of school science learning environments. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation (pp. 117-134). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
10. Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What's so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22, 61-79.
11. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSIELA%20Standards.pdf
12. Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
13. Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (in press). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A three-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development.
14. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
15. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241.
16. Felton, M. (2004). The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation. Cognitive Development, 19, 35-52.
17. Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32, 135-153.
18. Ford, M. (2012). Adialogic account ofsense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 207-245.
19. Ford, M., & Forman, E. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1-32.
20. Garcia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S., & Felton, M. (2013). The effect of argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse. Science Education, 97, 497-523.
21. Gilbert, M. (1997). Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M., (2012). Rational argument. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 277-300). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Hillocks, G. (2011). Teaching argument writing, Grades 6-12: Supporting claims with relevant evidence and clear reasoning. New York, NY: Heinemann.
25. Iordanou, K. (2010). Developing argument skills across scientific and social domains. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 293-327.
26. Iordanou, K. (2013). Developing face-to-face argumentation skills: Does arguing on the computer help? Journal of Cognition and Development, 14, 292-320.
27. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Erduran, S. (2008). Designing argumentation learning environments. In S. Erduran & M. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. New York, NY: Springer.
28. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Kuhn, D. (2009). The importance of learning about knowing: Creating a foundation for development of intellectual values. Perspectives on Child Development, 3, 112-117.
31. Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94, 810-824.
32. Kuhn, D. (2013). Reasoning. In P. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 744-764). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents' thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545-552.
34. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245-1260.
35. Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79, 1311-1329.
36. Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (in press). Argue with me: Developing thinking and writing through dialog. Bronxville, NY: Wessex Press.
37. Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and value of argumentive discourse. Discourse Processes, 48, 26-49.
38. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 359-377.
39. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137-168.
40. Mercier, H. (2011). Reasoning serves argumentation in children. Cognitive Development, 26, 177-191.
41. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57-111.
42. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 283-297.
43. Next Generation Science Standards. (2013, April 8). Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org
44. Nussbaum, E.M.(2008). Using argumentation vee diagrams (AVDs) for promoting argument-counterargument integration in reflective writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 549-565.
45. Nussbaum, E. M., & Edwards, O. (2011). Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students' reasoning practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 443-488.
46. Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Hahn, U. (2008). Human reasoning and argumentation: The probabilistic approach. In J. Adler & L. Rips (Eds.), Reasoning: Studies of human inference and its foundations (pp. 383-413). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47. Pease, M., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem-based learning. Science Education, 95, 57-86.
48. Resnick, L., & Nelson-LeGall, S. (1997). Socializing intelligence. In L. Smith, J. Dockrell, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond (pp. 145-158). London, UK: Routledge.
49. Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32, 155-175.
50. Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96, 488-526.
51. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93, 448-484.
52. Udell, W. (2007). Enhancing adolescent girls' argument skills in reasoning about personal and non-personal decisions. Cognitive Development, 22, 341-352.
53. Walton, D. N. (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation, 3, 169-184.
54. Walton, D. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
55. Weinstock, M., Neuman, Y., & Tabak, I. (2004). Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students' ability to identify fallacious arguments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 77-94.
56. Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1157-1186.
57. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.