Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents' thinking

Psychological Science

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 545-552

  Kuhn, Deanna ^a   Crowell, Amanda ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescence; argumentation; collaborative reasoning; dialogue; epistemology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; ARTICLE; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; LOGIC; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; THINKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; LOGIC; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TEACHING; THINKING;

EID: 79954472454     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611402512     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
2. Graff G. Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2003:.
3. Kuhn D. The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
4. Kuhn D. Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education. 2010;94: 810-824.
5. Kuhn D.,Wang Y.,Li H. Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and value of argumentive discourse. Discourse Processes. 2011;48: 26-49.
6. Michaels S.,O'Connor C.,Resnick L. Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2008;27: 283-297.
7. The nation's report card: Writing 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2008:.
8. Oaksford M.,Chater N.,Hahn U. Reasoning: Studies of human inference and its foundations. Adler J. Rips L., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008:383-413.
9. Shaenfield, D. (2011). Arguing with peers: Examining two kinds of discourse and their cognitive benefits. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. Toulmin S. The uses of argument. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
11. Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978:.
12. Walton D. Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation. 1989;3: 169-184.