Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning

Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-131

  Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling ^a   Chai, Ching Sing ^a   Wong, Benjamin ^a   Hong, Huang Yao ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943328094     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-444-3     Document Type: Book

References (336)

1. Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89–177.
2. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
3. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16–25.
4. Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper’s world 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21–23.
5. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology(2nd ed., pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
8. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
9. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
10. Burdick, A., & Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32, 546–556.
11. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 31–51.
12. Chai, C. S., & Lim, C. P. (2011). The internet and teacher education: Traversing between the digitized world and schools. The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 3–9.
13. Chai, C. S., Lim, C. P., & Tan, C. M. (Eds.). (In press). Future learning in primary schools - A Singapore perspective. Singapore: Springer.
14. Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2012). Analyzing educational policies: A learning design perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 487–521.
15. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.
16. Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. C. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
17. Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
18. Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521–532.
19. Dufour, P. (2010). Supplying demand for Canada’s knowledge society: A warmer future for a cold climate? American Behavioral Scientist, 53(7), 983–996.
20. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21. Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Felton, E., Zelenko, O., & Vaughan, S. (Eds.). (2012). Design and ethics: Reflections on practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
23. Foo, J. C. K. (2012). A study on the impact of knowledge building in design and technology. Unpublished master thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
24. Harfield, S. (2007). On design ‘problematization’: Theorising differences in design outcomes. Design Studies, 28(2), 159–172.
25. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
26. Heskett, J. (2005). Design: A very short introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27. Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Constructionism. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences(pp. 35–46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306.
29. Kimbell, R., & Perry, D. (2001). Design and technology in a knowledge economy. London, UK: Engineering Council.
30. Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 2, 1–9.
31. Kurokawa, T. (2013). Design thinking education at universities and graduate schools. Science & Technology Trends Quarterly Review, 46, 50–62. Retrieved December 2014, from http://www.nistep.go.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/Science-Technology-Trends-Quarterly-Review-No.46%EF%BC%8Dreport4.pdf
32. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 131–137.
34. Macdonald, G., & Hursh, D. (2006). Twenty-first century schools: Knowledge, networks and new economies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publication.
35. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
36. Noddings, N. (1998). Philosophy of education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
37. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing.
38. Pink, D. H. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York, NY: Riverhead.
39. Popper, K. (1978, April 7). Three worlds. Retrieved March 16, 2010, from http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/popper80.pdf
40. Reich, R. (1992). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York, NY: Random House. Report of the Economic Strategies Committee [ESC]. (2010). Singapore. Retrieved August 3, 2014, from http://www.mti.gov.sg/Re.earchRoom/Pages/Report-of-the-Economic-Strategies-Committee.aspx
41. Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, 183–197.
42. Resnick, L. B. (2013). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Keynote speech for Ed Media, Victoria, BC.
43. Rowland, G. (2004). Shall we dance? A design epistemology for organizational learning and performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 33–48.
44. Salkowitz, R. (2010). Young world rising: How youth technology and entrepreneurship are changing the world from the bottom up. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
45. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society(pp. 76–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
46. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/574
47. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London, UK: Temple Smith.
48. Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial(3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Singapore Polytechnic. (2011). Singapore poly taps in on ‘design thinking.’ Retrieved onAugust 3, 2014, from http://www.sp.edu.sg/wps/portal/vp-spws/!ut/p/a0/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfGjzOJDPUxdjdxMTQwsXM0NDDxNTf0t3Uw9DDzNzfULsh0VAQxOSmU!/?PC_Z7_UH5E2F5408E700I55O9F5H0AK6027774_WCM_CONTEXT¼/wps/wcm/connect/lib-spws/site-spwebsite/sa-news/sp+new+programme+taps+design+thinking
50. Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16–28.
51. Tan, L. (2010). Adolescent literacies, multimodal textual repertoires, and digital media: Exploring sites of digital literacy practices and learning inside and outside of school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England.
52. Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
53. Thomke, S., & Feinberg, B. (2009). Design thinking and innovation at Apple. Harvard Business School, 1–12.
54. Trebell, D. (2009). Exploring pupils’ beliefs about designers and designing. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(1), 19–54.
55. Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., Hong, H.-Y., & Tan, S. C. (2013). Positioning design epistemology and its applications in education technology. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 81–90.
56. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
57. Wong, Y. L. (2011). Developing opposable minds: Why design learning should become an integral part of the core curriculum in 21st century education. In W. Choy & C. Tan (Eds.), Education reform in Singapore: Critical perspectives(pp. 128–148). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
58. Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
59. Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed., with an introduction by Margaret Canovan). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60. Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55.
61. Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
62. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Oxford, England: Berg.
63. Descartes, R. (1994). Discourse on the method (G. Heffernan, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
64. Douven, I. (2011). Supplement to abduction: Peirce on abduction. From Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/peirce.html
65. Edwards, D. (2008). Artscience: Creativity in the post-Google generation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Felton, E., Zelenko, O., & Vaughan, S. (Eds.). (2012). Design and ethics: Reflections on practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
67. Finlay, L. (2008). Reflecting on ‘reflective practice’. Milton Keynes, England: Practice-Based Professional Learning Centre. Retrieved December 27, 2012, http://www.open.ac.uk/opencetl/resources/pbpl-resources/finlay-l-2008-reflecting-reflective-practice-pbpl-paper-52
68. Flusser, V. (2013). Shape of things: A philosophy of design. London, UK: Reaktion Books.
69. Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part 1. Design and Culture, 3(2), 285–306.
70. Mendelson, C. (2012). The good life: The moral individual in an antimoral world. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
71. Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world: Foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
72. Pangle, T. L. (2014). On Heisenberg’s key statement concerning ontology. The Review of Metaphysics, 67, 835–859.
73. Rojcewicz, R. (2006). The gods and technology: A reading of Heidegger. Albany, NJ: SUNY Press.
74. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York, NY: Basic Books.
75. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
76. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London, UK: Penguin Books.
78. Waks, L. J. (2001). Donald Schön’s philosophy of design and design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(1), 37–51.
79. Wolfe, A. (2009). All power to the choice architects: A liberal critique of libertarian paternalism. Retrieved August 2, 2014, from http://newamerica.net/publications/policy/all_power_to_the_choice_architects
80. Xenophon. (2001). The education of Cyrus (Translated and annotated by Wayne Ambler). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
81. Almas, A., & Krumsvik, R. (2008). Teaching in technology-rich classrooms: Is there a gap between teachers’ intentions and ICT practices? Research in Comparative and International Education, 3(2), 103–121.
82. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2010). Draft White Paper 1: Defining 21st century skills. Melbourne, Australia: ACTS.
83. Casey, A., Hastie, P. A., & Rovegno, I. (2011). Student learning during a unit of student-designed games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16(4), 331–350.
84. Chai, C. S., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Modelling with computers as Mindtools. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Teaching with technology: Strategies for engaging learners(pp. 77–94). Singapore: Pearson Prentice Hall.
85. Ching, C. C., & Kafai, Y. B. (2008). Peer pedagogy: Student collaboration and reflection in a learning-through-design project. Teachers College Record,110(12), 2601–2632.
86. Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using and elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60–69.
87. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.
88. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. New York, NY: Berg.
89. Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714–730.
90. Group, M., & NCREL. (2003). EnGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Chicago, IL: NCREL.
91. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–32.
92. Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385–395.
93. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed., pp. 7–92). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
94. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology(4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
95. Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564.
96. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Towards a design theory of problem. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 63–85.
97. Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
98. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
99. Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-Developing Instructional Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.
100. Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2013). Towards a TPACK-fostering ICT instructional process for teachers: Lessons from the implementation of interactive whiteboard instruction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2).
101. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.
102. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
103. Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think. London, UK: Architectural Press.
104. Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford, England: Architectural Press.
105. Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise (Vol. 31). Oxford, England: Architectural Press.
106. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233.
107. Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., & Pöllänen, S. (2013). Making learning whole: an instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 51–86.
108. Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.
109. Loughran, J. J. (2002). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
110. Macdonald, G., & Hursh, D. (2006). Twenty-first century schools: Knowledge, networks and new economies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publication.
111. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record,108(6), 1017–1054.
112. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–37.
113. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
114. P21. (2007). Maximizing the impact: The pivotal role of technology in a 21st century education system. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/p21setdaistepaper.pdf
115. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
116. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 1–11.
117. Popper, K. (1978). Three worlds. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, 144.
118. Rowe, P. G. (1991). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
119. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, Mathematics and Science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 259–275.
120. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
121. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004.
122. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. In Learners and pedagogy(pp. 61–77). London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
123. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
124. Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343–355.
125. Smeets, E., & Mooij, T. (2001). Pupil‐centred learning, ICT, and teacher behaviour: Observations in educational practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 403–417.
126. Sugar, W. A., & Warren, L. L. (2003). Promoting a teacher/leader-designer perspective for public school teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 25(3), 30–37.
127. Summerville, J., & Reid-Griffin, A. (2008). Technology integration and instructional design. TechTrends, 52(5), 45–51.
128. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
129. Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54(1), 113–122.
130. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
131. Apeddoe, X. S., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Strategies for success: Uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science, 41, 773–791.
132. Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2011). An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(6), 765–782.
133. Benson, C., & Lunt, J. (2011). We’re creative on a Friday afternoon: Investigating children’s perceptions of their experience of Design and Technology in relation to creativity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 679–687.
134. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology(2nd ed., pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
135. Brennan, K., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2010). Making projects, making friends: Online community as catalyst for interactive media creation. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 75–83.
136. Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2013). Imagining, creating, playing, sharing, reflecting: How online community supports young people as designers of interactive media. In C. Mouza & N. C. Lavigne (Eds.), Emerging technologies for the classroom(pp. 253–268). New York, NY: Springer.
137. Cross, A. (2006). School inspectors’ comments relating to teaching methods in Design and Technology in primary school inspection reports. Research in Education, 75, 19–28.
138. Dabbagh, N., & Dass, S. (2013). Case problems for problem-based pedagogical approaches: A comparative analysis. Computers & Education,64, 161–174.
139. Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills, rethinking how students learn(pp. 51–75). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
140. de Jong, T., Weinberger, A., Girault, I., Kluge, A., Lazonder, A. W., Pdeaste, M., … Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments. Education Technology, Research & Development, 60, 883–901. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9258-1.
141. Dolenc, K., & Aberšek, B. (2012). Integration of design, modeling and visualization in Slovenian primary education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 46.
142. Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2). Retrieved May 6, 2014, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v19n2/doppelt
143. Drever, E. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research: A teacher’s guide. Glasgow, UK: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
144. du Plessis, A., & Webb, P. (2011). An extended cyberhunts strategy: Learner centered learning-by-design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1190–1207.
145. Guzdial, M. (2008). Paving the way for computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 25–27.
146. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis(6th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
147. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–32.
148. Heskett, J. (2005). Design: A very short introduction (Vol. 136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
149. Hill, A. M., & Anning, A. (2001). Primary teachers’ and students’ understanding of school situated design in Canada and England. Research in Science Education, 31, 117–135.
150. Howland, J., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology(4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
151. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory for problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 63–85.
152. Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Constructionism. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences(pp. 35–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
153. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Design thinking in elementary students’ collaborative lamp designing process. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(1), 30–43.
154. Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational compute r games: A case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers & Education, 73, 26–39.
155. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design(tm) into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
156. Levy, S. T. (2013). Young children’s learning of water physics by constructing working systems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 537–566.
157. Lee, C. S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2011). Scaffolding students’ development of creative design skills: A curriculum reference model. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 3–15.
158. Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4). doi:10.1145/1868358.1868363. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363ACM
159. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London, UK: Routledge.
160. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
161. Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In I. Harel, & S. Papert (Eds.) Constructionism. (pp. 1–7). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing. Retrieved May 2014, from http://namodemello.com.br/pdf/tendencias/situatingconstrutivism.pdf
162. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.
163. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
164. Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(4), 43–55.
165. Richtel, M. (2014, May 10). Reading, writing, arithmetic, and lately, coding. New York Times. Retrieved from May 13, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/11/us/reading-writingarithmetic-and-lately-coding.html
166. Sawyer, K. R. (2012, July 2-6). Learning how to create: Toward a learning sciences of art and design. Paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Sydney, Australia.
167. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences(pp. 97–115). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
168. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/574/276
169. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (Vol. 136). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
170. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
171. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
172. Wendell, B. K., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540.
173. Yelland, N., Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2008). Learning by design: Creating pedagogical frameworks for knowledge building in the 21st century. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 197–213.
174. Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
175. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
176. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions(pp. 55–68). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.
177. Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products–three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal,11(4), 333–346.
178. Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37–53.
179. Chai, C. S., Ling Koh, J. H., Tsai, C. C., & Lee Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184–1193.
180. Chai, C. S., Teo, T., & Lee, C. B. (2009). The change in epistemological beliefs and beliefs about teaching and learning: A study among pre-service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 351–362.
181. Chai, C. S., Teo, T., & Lee, C. B. (2010). Modelling the relationships among beliefs about learning, knowledge, and teaching of pre-service teachers in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 25–42.
182. Collins, A. (1996). Design issues for learning environments. In International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments(pp. 347–361). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
183. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.
184. Cross, N. (2007). Forty years of design research. Design Studies, 28(1), 1–4.
185. Engelmann, S. (1980). Direct instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
186. Erkunt, H. (2010). Emergence of epistemic agency in a college level educational technology course for pre-service teachers engaged in CSCL. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 38–51.
187. Gan, Y., Scardamalia, M., Hong, H. Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). Early development of graphical literacy through knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Published online at http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/581
188. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., et al. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do(pp. 358–389). New York, NY: Wiley.
189. Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York, NY: Doubleday.
190. Hong, H.-Y. (2014). Developing student-centered teaching beliefs through knowledge building among prospective teachers. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (Education innovations book series by Springer, pp. 189–204). Singapore: Springer Science + Business Media Singapore.
191. Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(5), 613–627.
192. Hong, H. Y., Chen, F. C., Chai, C. S., & Chan, W. C. (2011). Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science, 39(4), 467–482.
193. Hong, H. Y., & Lin, S. P. (2010). Teacher-education students’ epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 99–110.
194. Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
195. Khushu, M. (2011). Design for Change. Connect, (190), 3.
196. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of design dispositions, lesson design practices, and their relationships with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1–14 (ahead-of-print).
197. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problembased learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.
198. Laferrière, T., Lamon, M., & Chan, C. K. K. (2006). Emerging e-trends and models in teacher education and professional development. Teaching Education, 17, 75–90.
199. Martin, L., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Prospective adaptation in the use of external representations. Cognition and Instruction, 27(4), 370–400.
200. Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle school science through designbased learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71–85.
201. Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012). Design thinking research. Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
202. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
203. Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2006). Knowledge building in mathematics: Supporting collaborative learning in pattern problems. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 441–465.
204. Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2010). Knowledge building and Mathematics: Shifting the responsibility for knowledge advancement and engagement. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Published online at http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/575
205. Nason, R., & Woodruff, E. (2004). Online collaborative learning in mathematics: Some necessary innovations. In Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice(pp. 103–131). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publications.
206. Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: Teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91.
207. Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
208. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
209. Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.
210. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
211. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society, 97, 67–98.
212. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
213. Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action:Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
214. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
215. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (Eds.). (2001). Success for all: Research and reform in elementary education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
216. Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38(2), 147–171.
217. Tileston, D. (2000). Ten best teaching practices: How brain research, learning styles, and standards define teaching competencies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
218. van Aalst, J., & Truong, M. S. (2011). Promoting knowledge creation discourse in an Asian primary five classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 487–515.
219. Wang, J., Weber, N., Dyehouse, M., & Strobel, J. (2012). The role of authenticity in design-based learning environments: The case of engineering education. Computers & Education, 64, 143–152.
220. Whyte, J. K., & Cardellino, P. (2010). Learning by design: Visual practices and organizational transformation in schools. Design Issues, 26(2), 59–69.
221. Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.
222. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7–44.
223. Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39(4), 429–452.
224. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.
225. Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado springs: BSCS. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 29, 407–427.
226. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Education Technology and Society, 16(2), 31–51.
227. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.
228. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. New York, NY: Berg.
229. Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.
230. Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521–532.
231. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437.
232. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
233. Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714–730.
234. Gess-Newsome, J. (Ed.). (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
235. Gibbons, A. S., Botturi, L., Boot, E., & Nelson, J. (2008). Design languages. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology(pp. 633–645). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
236. Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45.
237. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., et al. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do(pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
238. Harris, J. B. (2008). TPCK in in-service education: Assisting experienced teachers’ “planned improvisations”. In Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York, NY: Routledge.
239. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. A. H. Stevenson & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan(pp. 262–272). New York, NY: Freeman.
240. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education,51(4), 1499–1509.
241. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.
242. Hoogveld, A. W., Paas, F., Jochems, W. M., & Van Merriёnboer, J. J. (2002). Exploring teachers’ instructional design practices from a systems design perspective. Instructional Science, 30(4), 291–305.
243. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
244. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Design opportunities and their impact pre-service teachers’ perception of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Global Chinese Journal of Computers in Education, 10(1), 20–35.
245. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education,78, 1–10.
246. Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.
247. Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2013). Towards a TPACK-fostering ICT instructional process for teachers: Lessons from the implementation of interactive whiteboard instruction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 233–247.
248. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
249. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
250. Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford: Architectural Press.
251. Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.
252. Lim, W. P., Ang, P. L., & Koh, J. H. L. (in-press). Developing teachers’ technological pedagogical mathematics knowledge (TPMK) to build students’ capacity to think and communicate in mathematics classrooms. In C. S. Chai, C. P. Lim & C. M. Tan (Eds.), Future learning in primary schools – A Singapore perspective. Singapore: Springer.
253. Marra, R. (2005). Teacher beliefs: The impact of the design of constructivist learning environments on instructor epistemologies. Learning Environments Research, 8(2), 135–155.
254. Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.
255. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record,108(6), 1017–1054.
256. MOE. (2014). 21st century competencies, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/21cc/
257. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–37.
258. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2013). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
259. Paton, B., & Dorst, K. (2011). Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies, 32(6), 573–587.
260. Peirce, C. S. (1955). Abduction and induction. In Philosophical writings of Peirce, 11. New York: Dover Publications.
261. Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, New York: Dover Publications, 2(01), 51–74.
262. Porras-Hernéndez, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223–244.
263. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
264. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
265. Rowe, P. G. (1991). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
266. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacherrelated variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 160–172.
267. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic books.
268. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
269. Simmie, G. M. (2007). Teacher Design Teams (TDTs)—building capacity for innovation, learning and curriculum implementation in the continuing professional development of in-career teachers. Irish Educational Studies, 26(2), 163–176.
270. Smith, J. B. (1994). Collective intelligence in computer-based collaboration. HilIsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
271. Summerville, J., & Reid-Griffin, A. (2008). Technology integration and instructional design. TechTrends, 52(5), 45–51.
272. Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & Van Braak, J. (2008). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494–506.
273. Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Building the ICT capacity of the next generation of teachers in Asia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 1057–1060.
274. Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., et al. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1235–1244.
275. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
276. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.
277. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.
278. Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between ho w novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–11.
279. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
280. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.
281. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 32–42.
282. Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Hernandez Van-Nest, M., … Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57–72.
283. Cameron, L. (2006). Picture this: My Lesson. How LAMS is being used with pre-service teachers to develop effective classroom activities. Paper presented at the The First International LAMS conference: Designing the future of learning, Sydney.
284. Carmel-Gilfilen, C., & Portillo, M. (2010). Developmental trajectories in design thinking: An examination of criteria. Design Studies, 31(1), 74–91.
285. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.
286. Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 89–106.
287. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.
288. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. New York, NY: Berg.
289. Dorst, K., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2004). Levels of expertise in design education. In DS 33: Proceedings of E & PDE 2004, the 7th international conference on engineering and product design education, Delft, the Netherlands, 02.-03.09. 2004.
290. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
291. Gibbons, A. S., Botturi, L., Boot, E., & Nelson, J. (2008). Design languages. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology(pp. 633–645). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
292. Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies, 16(2), 189–209.
293. Goldschmidt, G., & Weil, M. (1998). Contents and structure in design reasoning. Design Issues, 14(3), 85–100.
294. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed., pp. 7–92). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
295. Ho, C.-H. (2001). Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: Differences between novices and experts. Design Studies, 22(1), 27–45.
296. Hoadley, C., & Cox, C. (2009). What is design knowledge and how do we teach it. In C. DiGiano, S. Goldman, & M. Chorost (Eds.), Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools(pp. 19–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
297. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology(4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
298. Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564.
299. Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2008). Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Design Studies, 29(4), 315–337.
300. Kan, W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2005). Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing. CAADRIA, 5(1), 451–457.
301. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
302. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
303. Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric to analyze teachers’ conceptions of meaningful learning in ICT lesson planning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900.
304. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Design opportunities and their impact pre-service teachers’ perception of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Global Chinese Journal of Computers in Education, 10(1), 20–35.
305. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education,78, 1–10.
306. Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-Developing Instructional Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.
307. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (in press). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of Design Dispositions, Lesson Design Practices and their relationships with Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education.
308. Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
309. Lloyd, P., & Scott, P. (1994). Discovering the design problem. Design Studies, 15(2), 125–140.
310. Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21–36.
311. McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2), 216–242.
312. Michlewski, K. (2008). Uncovering design attitude: Inside the culture of designers. Organization Studies, 29(3), 373–392.
313. Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105–122.
314. Perry, W. G. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
315. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
316. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
317. Shambaugh, N., & Magliaro, S. (2001). A reflexive model for teaching instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 69–92.
318. Van Merriёnboer, J. J., Clark, R. E., & De Croock, M. B. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39–61.
319. Wieringa, N. (2011). Teachers’ educational design as a process of reflection‐in‐action: The lessons we can learn from Donald Schön’s the reflective practitioner when studying the professional practice of teachers as educational designers. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(1), 167–174.
320. Apeddoe, X. S., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Strategies for success: Uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science, 41, 773–791.
321. Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.
322. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
323. Goldschmidt, G., & Weil, M. (1998). Contents and structure in design reasoning. Design Issues, 14(3), 85–100.
324. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.
325. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
326. Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric to analyze teachers’ conceptions of meaningful learning in ICT lesson planning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900.
327. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education,78, 1–10.
328. Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.
329. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.
330. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.
331. Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(4), 43–55.
332. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
333. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
334. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
335. Summerville, J., & Reid-Griffin, A. (2008). Technology integration and instructional design. TechTrends, 52(5), 45–51.
336. Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., Wong, B. K. S., Hong, H.-Y., & Tan, S. C. (2013). Positioning design epistemology and its applications in education technology. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 81–90.