Developing a better understanding of technology based pedagogy

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 714-730

  Gao, Ping ^a   Choy, Doris ^a   Wong, Angela F L ^a   Wu, Jing ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950350223     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1117     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andersson, S. B. (2006). Newly qualified teachers' learning related to their use of information and communication technology: A Swedish perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 665-682.
2. Ball, D. L. & McDiarmid, G. W. (1987). Understanding how teachers' knowledge changes. National Center for Teacher Education Colloquy, 1(1), 9-13.
3. Bird, T. & Rosaen, C. L. (2005). Providing authentic contexts for learning information technology in teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 211-221.
4. British Columbia Ministry of Education (1999). Conditions for success: Report of the teaching, learning and education technology advisory committee to the British Columbia Ministry of Education. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Education.
5. Brophy, J. (1991). Advances in research on teaching: Teachers' knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6. Brown, D. & Warschauer, M. (2006). From the university to the elementary classroom: students' experiences in learning to integrate technology in instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 599-621.
7. Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as the attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-237.
8. Cannella, G. S. & Reiff, J. C. (1994). Individual constructivist teacher education: Teachers as empowered learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(3), 27-38.
9. CEO Forum on Educational Technology (2000). School technology and readiness: A focus on digital learning. [viewed 1 Aug 2007] http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/report3.pdf
10. Choy, D., Wong, A. & Gao, P. (2008). Singapore's preservice teachers' perspectives in integrating information and communication technology (ICT) during practicum. Proceedings of AARE Conference 2008. Brisbane, 30 Nov to 4 Dec. http://www.aare.edu.au/08pap/cho08326.pdf
11. Chan, K. W., Tan, J. & Khoo, A. (2007). Pre-service teachers' conceptions about teaching and learning: A closer look at Singapore cultural context. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 181-195.
12. Dawson, K. (2006). Teacher inquiry: A vehicle to merge prospective teachers' experience and reflection during curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 265-292.
13. Dexter, S. & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college's walls. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 334-346.
14. Doering, A., Hughes, J. & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342-362.
15. Duffy, T. M. & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
16. Fleming, L., Motamedi, V. & May, L. (2007). Predicting preservice teacher competence in computer technology: Modeling and application in training environments. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 207-231.
17. Garcia, P. & Rose, S. (2007). The influence of technocentric collaboration on preservice teachers' attitudes about technology's role in powerful learning and teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 247-266.
18. Gao, P. (2005). Learning to teach with information technology: Preservice teachers' perspectives and experiences across their three semester preparation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(10), p. 3550. (UMI No. 3194016).
19. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
20. Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 160-189.
21. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
22. International Society for Technology in Education (2000). NETS for teachers. [viewed 1 Jan 2008, verified 1 Nov 2009] http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ ForTeachers/2000Standards/NETS_for_Teachers_2000.htm
23. Johnson, G. & Howell, A. (2005). Attitude toward instructional technology following required vs. optional WebCT usage. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 643-654.
24. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Judge, S. & O'Bannon, B. (2007). Integrating technology into field-based experiences: A model that fosters change. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 286-302.
26. Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383-408.
27. Kay, R. H. & Knaack, L. (2005). A case for ubiquitous, integrated computing in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 391-412.
28. Lerman, S. (1989). Constructivism, mathematics and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(2), 211-223.
29. Lim, C. P. & Chan, B. C. (2007). MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service. teachers' pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48(4), 474-494.
30. Lincoln, G. E. C. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
31. Lipscomb, G. B. & Doppen, F. H. (2005). Climbing the STAIRS: Pre-service social studies teachers' perceptions of technology integration. International Journal of Social Education, 19(2), 70-82.
32. McNabb, M., Hawkes, M. & Rouk, U. (1999). Critical issues in evaluating the effectiveness of technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. [viewed 1 May 2008] http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/techconf99/confsum.pdf
33. McIntyre, S. R. & Tlusty, R. H. (1995). Computer-mediated discourse: Electronic dialogue journaling and reflective practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED385232
34. Moursund, D. & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange.
35. Mullen, L. (2001). Beyond infusion: Preservice students' understandings about educational technologies for teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 447-466.
36. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, Task Force on Technology and Teacher Education (1998). Technology and the new professional teachers: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Washington DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
37. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-384). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
38. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Reeves, T. C. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools: A research report prepared for the Bertelsmann Foundation. [viewed 1 May 2008, verified 1 Nov 2009] http://it.coe.uga.edu/~treeves/edit6900/BertelsmannReeves98.pdf
40. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O'Dwyer, L. & O'Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
41. Singapore Ministry of Education (2002). Masterplan for IT - Masterplan review. [viewed 1 May 2008, not found 1 Nov 2009] http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mpite/overview/index.html
42. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
43. Strudler, N., McKinney, M.O., Jones, W.P. & Quinn, L.F. (1999). First year teachers' use of technology: Preparation, expectations, and realities. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 115-130.
44. Stulmann, J. (1998). A model for infusing technology into teacher training programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2/3), 125-140.
45. Swain, C. (2006). Preservice teachers self-assessment using technology: Determining what is worthwhile and looking for changes in daily teaching and learning practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 29-59.
46. Teo, T., Chai, C. S., Hung, D. & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre-service teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 165-176.
47. Vannatta, R. A. & Beyerbach, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 132-148.
48. Willis, J. & Mehlinger, H. (1996). Information technology and teacher Education. In J. Sikula, T.J. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbooks of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 978-1029). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
49. Willis, J., Thompson, A. & Sadera, W. (1999). Research on technology and teacher education: Current status and future directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 29-45.
50. Wright, V. H. & Wilson, E. K. (2005). From preservice to inservice teaching: A study of technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(2), 49-55.