Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-44

  Zhang, Jianwei ^a   Scardamalia, Marlene ^b   Reeve, Richard ^c   Messina, Richard ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449118874     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400802581676     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Amar, A. D. (2002). Managing knowledge workers: Unleashing innovation and productivity. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
2. Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks [Online], Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3).
3. Barab, S., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett, S., Shaw, R. E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Learning as participation in autocatakinetic systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 249-390.
4. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with BCIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797-817.
5. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves. Chicago: Open Court.
7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (in press). Toward research-based innovation. In F. Benavides (Ed.), Emerging models for learning and innovation. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
8. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (2006). Fostering knowledge-creating communities. In A. M. O'Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 37-60). Mahwah., NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon. (Eds.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 188-228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Social life of information. Boston: HBS Press.
12. Burt, R. S. (1991). Structure: A general purpose network analysis program, reference manual. New York: Columbia University.
13. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Chatzkel, J. L. (2003). Knowledge capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
16. Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
17. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom.: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-15.
18. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15-42.
19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Cusumano, M. A. (2001). Focusing creativity. In I. Nonaka & T. Nishiguchi (Eds.), Knowledge emergence (pp. 111-123). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21. Cyram. (2004). NetMiner II. Version 2.5.0. Seoul, South Korea: Author.
22. Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco:.
23. De Leede, J., Nijhof, A. H., & Fisscher, O. A. (1999). The myth of self-managing teams: A reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 203-215.
24. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Eds.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open. Universiteit Nederland.
25. Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
27. Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners' knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.
28. Gates, D. (2005, September 11). Boeing 787: Parts from around world will be swiftly integrated. The Seattle Times.
29. Gloor, P. A. (2006). Swarm creativity: Competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1072-1088.
31. Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside, Department of Sociology.
32. Herrerikohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431-473.
33. Hewitt, J. G. (1996). Progress toward a knowledge-building community. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
34. Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Hesse, F. W. (2007). An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 899-910.
35. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychological Review, 18, 159-185.
36. Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community: Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 17-22). Boulder, CO: Erlbaum.
37. Lamon, M., Secules, T., Petrosino, A. J., Hackett, R., Bransford, J. D., & Goldman, S. R. (1996). Schools for thought: Overview of the international project and lessons learned from one of the sites. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Contributions of instructional innovation to understanding learning (pp. 243-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 277-307.
39. Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Schauble, L., & Putz, A. (2000). Designing classrooms that support inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. V. Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 80-99). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
40. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
42. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 130), 249-273.
45. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor - An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535-557.
46. Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C. W., & David, Y. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal, 5, 643-658.
47. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Resnick, L. B., & Hall, M. W. (2001). The principles of learning: Study tools for educators (Version 2.0) [CD-ROM]. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Institute for Learning, LRDC.
49. Roth, W. M., & Bowen, G. M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a Grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 73-128.
50. Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanations and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development, 45, 2-28.
52. Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, S. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Wakamura, et al. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 12-60). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
53. Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 3(2), 12-20.
54. Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
55. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Eds.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open. Court.
56. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
57. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
58. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean., R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
60. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
61. Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Chambers, J. C. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165-178.
62. Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 393-429.
63. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64. Valsiner, J., & Veer, R. V. D. (2000). The social mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65. van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios in Knowledge Forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 175-220.
66. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
67. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
68. Wells, G. (2002). Learning and teaching for understanding: The key role of collaborative knowledge building. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (pp. 1-41). Oxford, England: Elsevier/JAI Press.
69. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Williams, W. M., & Yang, L. T. (1999). Organizational creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 373-391). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
72. Zhang, J. (2004, March). The growing networks of inquiry threads in a knowledge building environment. Paper presented at the Knowledge Building Summer Institute, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
73. Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Teo, C., Scardamalia, M., & Morley, E. (2008, April). "Constantly going deeper": Knowledge building innovation in an elementary professional community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research. Association, New York, NY.
74. Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2007, April). Sustaining principle-based knowledge building innovation at an elementary school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
75. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of nine- and ten-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117-145.