Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective

Instructional Science

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 291-305

  Hoogveld, Albert W M ^a   Paas, Fred ^a   Jochems, Wim M G ^a   Van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Curriculum reform; Instructional design approach; Teacher training

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036297711     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016081812908     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Beijaard, D. (1994). Teacher competence, every day teaching practice and professionalization. European Journal of Agricultural Educational and Extension 1(2): 65-80.
2. Clark, R.E. & Estes, F. (1999). The development of authentic educational technologies. Educational Technology 39(2): 5-16.
3. Enkenberg, J. (2001). Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior 17: 495-506.
4. Fransella, F. & Bannister, D. (1977). A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. London: Academic Press.
5. Gaines, B.R. & Shaw, M.L.G. (1993). Basing knowledge acquisition tools in personal construct psychology. Knowledge Engineering Review 8(1): 49-85.
6. HBO-Raad (1996). Koers gekozen. Eindrapport van de vervolgvisitatiecommissie lerarenopleidingen basisonderwijs. [Course determined. Final follow-up report of visitation of Primary Teacher Training Colleges] (Sectorale kwaliteitszorg hbo, nr 28 en 33). Den Haag, the Netherlands: Voorlichtingsdienst HBO-Raad.
7. Herman, R.L. (1996). The repertory grid technique: path to teacher description of teacher potential? Instructional Science 24: 439-459.
8. Hoogveld, A.W.M., Paas, F., Jochems, W.M.G. & Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2001). The effects of a web-based training in an instructional systems design approach on teachers' instructional design behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 17: 363-371.
9. Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of personal Constructs, Vols. 1-2. New York: Norton.
10. Kerr, S.T. (1996). Visions of sugarplums: The future of technology, education and the schools, in S.T. Kerr, ed., Ninety-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part II. Technology and the Future of Schooling, pp. 1-27. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
11. Klauer, K.J. (1997). Instructional Design theory: a field in the making, in R.D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel & S. Dijkstra, eds, Instructional Design: International Perspectives, Volume 1, pp. 447-455. Mahwah, NJ: London.
12. Lang, M., Bünder, W., Hansen, H., Kysilka, M.L., Tillema, H. & Smith, K. (1999). Teacher professional development in the context of curriculum reform, in M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen & W. Bünder, eds, Changing schools/Changing Practices: Recent Research on Teacher Professionalism. Louvain, Belgium: Garant.
13. Lesbin, C.B., Pollock, J. & Reigeluth, C.M. (1992). Instructional Design Strategies and Tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
14. Moallem, M. (1998). An expert teacher's thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles: An ethnographic study. Educational Technology Research and Development 46: 37-64.
15. Munby, H. (1982). The place of teacher's belief in research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternative methodology, Instructional Science 11: 201-225.
16. Olson, J. (1981). Teacher influence in the classroom: a context for understanding curriculum translation. Instructional Science 10: 259-275.
17. Pope, M.L. & Keen, T.R. (1981). Personal Construct Psychology and Education. London: Academic Press.
18. Pratt, D.D. & associates (1998). Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education. Malbar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.
19. Reigeluth, C.M. & Nelson, L.M. (1997). A new paradigm of ISD? in R.M. Branch & B.B. Minor, eds, Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, Vol. 22, pp. 24-35. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
20. Reigeluth, C.M. & Avers, D. (1997). Educational technologists, chamelions, and systemic thinking, in R.M. Branch & B.B. Minor, eds, Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, Vol. 22, pp. 132-137. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
21. Rosset, A. (1987). Training Needs Assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
22. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, LTD.
23. Simons, P.R.J., Linden, J.L. van der & Duffy, T., eds (2000). New Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
24. Spector, J.M. (1995). Integrating and humanizing the process of automating instructional design, in R.D. Tennyson & A. Barron, eds, Automating Instructional Design: Computer-based Development and Delivery Tools, pp. 523-546. Brussels, Belgium: Springer-Verlag.
25. Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997). Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-component Instructional Design Model. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
26. Vermunt, J.D. and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction 9: 257-280.
27. Visscher-Voerman, J. (1999). Design Approaches in Training and Education: A Reconstructive Study. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
28. Wedman, J. & Tessmer, M. (1993) Instructional designers' decisions and priorities: A survey of design practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly 6(2): 43-57.