Design Languages

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 633-645

  Gibbons, Andrew S ^a   Botturi, Luca ^b   Boot, Eddy ^c   Nelson, Jon ^d  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

^d UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design language: A set of abstractions used to give structure, properties, and texture to solutions of design problems; designs are expressed in terms of design languages.; Design layer: One aspect of a decomposed design problem that can be approached using one or more design languages; a subdomain of the larger problem to which one or more design languages pertain.

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901834062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880869-52     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., and Yost, G. (1986). The geometry tutor. J. Math. Behav., 5-20.
3. Anderson, J. R., Conrad, F. G., and Corbett, A. T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP tutor. Cogn. Sci., 13, 467-506.
4. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. J. Learn. Sci., 14(2), 167-207.
5. Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B. (2000). Design Rules, Vol. 1. The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.*
6. Baresi, L., Garzotto, F., and Paolini, P. (2001). Extending UML for Modeling Web Applications. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 3-6, Maui, HI.
7. Barrows, H. S. (1998). The essentials of problem-based learning. J. Dent. Educ., 62(9), 630-633.
8. Barrows, H. S. and Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer.
9. Barton, D. and Tusting, K. (2005). Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, Power, and Social Context. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.*
10. Bass, L., Clements, P., and Kazman, R. (2003). Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Bazerman, C. (1999). The Languages of Edison’s Light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.*
12. Bloom, B., Ed. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, Vol. I. New York: David McKay.
13. Bolchini, D. and Paolini, P. (2006). Interactive dialogue model: a design technique for multi-channel applications. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
14. Boot, E. W., Nelson, J., van Merriënboer, J., and Gibbons, A. (2005). Stratification, elaboration, and formalization of design documents: effects on the production of instructional materials. In Building Blocks for Developing Instructional Software, edited by E. W. Boot. Ph.D. dissertation. Heerlen: Open Universiteit of the Netherlands.*
15. Botturi, L. (2006). E2ML: A visual language for the design of instruction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 54(3), 265-293.
16. Botturi, L., Derntl, M., Boot, E., and Figl, K. (2006). A Classification Framework for Educational Modeling Languages in Instructional Design. Paper presented at the International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, July 5-7, Kerkrade, the Netherlands.*
17. Brand, S. (1994). How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. New York: Penguin Books.*
18. Brayton, R. and Darringer, J. (2003). Logic synthesis overview. In The Best of ICCAD: 20 Years of Excellence in Computer-Aided Design, edited by A. Kuehlmann, pp. 181-190. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
19. Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.*
20. Buchannan, B. and Shortliffe, E. (1984). Intelligent computeraided instruction. In Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, edited by B. Buchannan and E. Shortliffe, pp. 455-463. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Caeiro-Rodriguez, M., Andino-Rifon, L., and Llamas-Nistal, M. (2006). POEML: A Perspective-Oriented Educational Modeling Language Meta-Model for Engineering e-Learning Practices. Paper presented at the 15th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2006), May 23-26, Edinburgh, Scotland.
22. Carbonell, J. R. (1970). AI in CAI: an artificial intelligence approach to computer-aided instruction. IEEE Trans. Man-Machine Syst., 11(4), 190-202.
23. Clancey, W. (1984). Use of MYCIN’s rules for tutoring. In Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, edited by B. Buchannan and E. Shortliffe, pp. 464-489. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, edited by L. Resnick, pp. 453-493. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Czarnecki, K., Antikiewicz, M., and Kim, C. H. (2006). Multilevel customization in application engineering: developing mechanisms for mapping features to analysis models. Commun. ACM, 49(12), 61-65.
26. Del Man, H. and Rabaey, J. (2003). System design and analysis overview. In The Best of ICCAD: 20 Years of Excellence in Computer-Aided Design, edited by A. Kuehlmann, pp. 93-106. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
27. Derntl, M. (2007). Patterns for Person-Centered e-Learning, Dissertations in Database and Information Systems-Infix Vol. 96. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
28. Dijkstra, S., Seel, N. M., Schott, F., and Tennyson, R. D., Eds. (1997). Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Vol. II. Solving Instructional Design Problems, Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Drake, L., Mills, R., Lawless, K., Curry, J., and Merrill, M. D. (1998). The Role of Explanations in Learning Environments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 13-17, San Diego, CA.
30. Fowler, M. (2003). UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Gabriel, R. P. (1996). Patterns of Software: Tales from the Software Community. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The Conditions of Learning, 1st ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning, 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34. Gibbons, A. S. (1977). A Review of Content and Task Analysis Methodology, Technology Report No. 2. San Diego, CA: Courseware, Inc.
35. Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? A theory of design structure. TechTrends, 47(5), 22-27.*
36. Gibbons, A. S. and Brewer, E. K. (2005). Elementary principles of design languages and notation systems for instructional design. In Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M. David Merrill, edited by J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack, and D. Wiley, pp. 111-129. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
37. Gibbons, A. S. and Rogers, P. C. (2006). Coming at Design from a Different Angle: Functional Design. Paper presented at the AECT Summer Research Symposium, June 22-25, Bloomington, IN.*
38. Gibbons, A. S. and Rogers, P.C. (2007). The architecture of instructional theory. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Vol. III, edited by C. Reigeluth, chap. 16. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
39. Gibbons, A. S., Nelson, J., and Richards, R. (2000). Theoretical and Practical Requirements for a System of Pre-Design Analysis: State of the Art of Pre-Design Analysis (white paper). Idaho Falls, ID: Center for Human-Systems Simulation, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (DOE).
40. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. Am. Anthropol., 96(3), 606-633.
41. Gray, J. (2006). A conversation with Werner Vogels: learning from the Amazon technology platform. ACM Queue, 4(4) (http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Contentandpa=showpageandpid=388).
42. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., and Weitzman, L. (1984). STEAMER: an interactive inspectable simulation-based training system. AI Mag., 5(2), 15-27.
43. Jackendoff, R. (1993). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Januszewski, A. (2001). Educational Technology: The Development of a Concept. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
45. Johnson, L., Rickel, J., and Lester, J. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 11, 47-78.
46. Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., and Hannum, W. H. (1999). Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Koedinger, K. R. and Anderson, J. R. (1998). Illustrating principled design: the early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization. Interact. Learn. Environ., 5, 161-180.
48. Koedinger, K. and Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive tutors: technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. K. Sawyer, pp. 61-78. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
49. Koper, R. (2002). Educational Modeling Language, http://learningnetworks.org.
50. Koper, R. and Tattersall, C., Eds. (2005). Learning Design: A Handbook on Modeling and Delivering Networked Education and Training. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
51. Kuehlmann, A., Ed. (2003). The Best of ICCAD: 20 Years of Excellence in Computer-Aided Design. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
52. Kuh, E. and Hsu, C. (2003). Physical design overview. In The Best of ICCAD: 20 Years of Excellence in Computer-Aided Design, edited by A. Kuehlmann, pp. 467-478. Boston. MA: Kluwer.
53. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Practice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
54. McDonald, J. K. (2006). Technology I, II, and III as Criteria to Better Understand How to Develop Scalable, Adaptive, and Generative Instruction. Ph.D. dissertation. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
55. McDonald, J. K. and Gibbons, A. S. (in press). Technology I, II, and III: criteria for understanding and improving the practice of instructional technology. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.
56. McWhorter, J. (2003). The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Languages. New York: Times Books.*
57. Merrill, M. D. (1994). The descriptive component display theory. In Instructional Design Theory, edited by M. D. Merrill and D. G. Twitchell, pp. 111-157. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
58. Miller, R. B. (1971). Development of a Taxonomy of Human Performance, Technical Report No. 11. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research.
59. Newsome, S. L., Spillers, W. R., and Finger, S. (1989). Design Theory '88: Proceedings of the NSF Grantee Workshop on Design Theory and Methodology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
60. Nirenburg, S. and Raskin, V. (2004). Ontological Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Noy, N. and McGuinness, D. (2006). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.html.
62. Paquette, G., Marino, O., De la Teja, I., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Léonard, M., and Contamines, J. (2005). Implementation and deployment of the IMS learning design specification Can. J. Learn. Technol., 31(2).
63. Pask, G. (1976). Conversation Theory: Applications in Education and Epistemology. New York: Elsevier.
64. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
65. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instruction-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Vol. II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67. Resnick, M. and Silverman, B. (2006). Exploring Emergence, http://llk.media.mit.edu/projects/emergence/contents.html.
68. Rheinfrank, J. and Evenson, S. (1996). Design languages. In Bringing Design to Software, edited by T. Winograd, pp. 63-79. New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
69. Richey, R. (1986). The Theoretical and Conceptual Bases of Instructional Design. New York: Kogan Page.
70. Rosenberg, S. (2007). Anything you can do I can do meta. Technol. Rev., 110(1), 36-48.
71. Saabagh, K. (1996). 21st-Century Jet: The Making and Marketing of the Boeing 777. New York: Scribner.
72. Sakallah, K., Walker, D., and Nassif, S. (2003). Timing, test, and manufacturing. In The Best of ICCAD: 20 Years of Excellence in Computer-Aided Design, edited by A. Kuehlmann, pp. 551-562. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
73. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.*
74. Seels, B. and Richey, R. (1994). Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of the Field. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
75. Snelbecker, G. E. (1985). Learning Theory, Instructional Theory, and Psychoeducational Design. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
76. Stevens, A. L. and Collins, A. (1977). The Goal Structure of a Socratic Tutor. Paper presented at the 1977 ACM Annual Conference, October 17-21, Seattle, WA.
77. Stubbs, S. T. (2006). Design Drawing in Instructional Design at Brigham Young University’s Center for Instructional Design: A Case Study. Ph.D. dissertation. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
78. Talmy, L. (2001). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. te Molder, H. and Potter, J., Eds. (2005). Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
80. Tennyson, R. D., Schott, F., Seel, N. M., and Dijkstra, S., Eds. (1997). Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Vol. I. Theory, Research, and Models. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
81. Waters, S. and Gibbons, A. S. (2004). Design languages, notation systems, and instructional technology: a case study. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 52(2), 57-69.*
82. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.*
83. Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1987). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.*