Peer pedagogy: Student collaboration and reflection in a learning-through- design project

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2601-2632

  Ching, Cynthia Carter ^a   Kafai, Yasmin B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58049189423     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barab, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403-436.
3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
4. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
5. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Ching, C. C., Kafai, Y B., & Marshall, S. (2000). Spaces for change: Gender and technology access in collaborative software design projects. Journal for Science Education and Technology, 9, 45-56.
7. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
8. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. Le Compte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 210-224). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Edelson, D., Pea, R., & Gomez, L. (1996). Constructivism in the collaboratory. In B. Wilson (Ed), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 151-164). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
13. Harel, I. (1991). Children designers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 1-32.
15. Hay, K., & Barab, S. (2001). Constructivism in practice: A comparison and contrast of apprenticeship and constructionist learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 281-322.
16. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.
17. Hodges, D. C. (1998). Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 272-290.
18. Hutchins, E. (1996). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kafai, Y B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Kafai, Y B. (2005). The classroom as living laboratory: Design-based research for understanding, comparing, and evaluating learning science through design. Educational Technology, 45, 28-33.
21. Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students' science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 323-363.
22. Kafai, Y. B., Ching, C. C., & Marshall, S. (1997). Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Computers and Education, 29, 117-126.
23. King, L. H. (1993). High and low achievers' perceptions of cooperative learning in two small groups. Elementary School Journal, 93, 399-416.
24. Kolodner J., Camp, P., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook J., et al. (2003). Problembased learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495-457.
25. Kolodner. J., Hmelo, C., & Narayanan, N. (1996). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domoshek (Eds.), Proceedings of ICLS 96 (pp. 300-307). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
26. Kolodner. J., & Nagel, K. (1999). The design discussion area: A collaborative learning tool in support of learning from problem-solving and design activities. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Designing new media for a new millennium (pp. 300-307). San Francisco: UNext.com.
27. Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Laverty, S. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3). Retrieved August 1, 2004, from http://www.ualberta.ca/̃iiqm/backissues/2-3final/html/laverty.html
30. Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001) Reviewing the community of practice metaphor: An analysis of control relations in an elementary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8, 129-147.
31. Marshall, S. (2000). Planning in context: A situated view of children's management of science projects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
32. Mintrop, H. (2001). Educating students to teach in a constructivist way: Can it all be done? Teachers College Record, 103, 207-239.
33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34. National Research Council. (1995). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Perkins, D. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. A. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students' use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 677-697.
37. Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273-304.
38. Ritchie, S., & Rigano, D. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33, 799-815.
39. Rogoff, B. (1993). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Boston: Cambridge University Press.
40. Roth, W. M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79, 475-502.
41. Scardemalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8, 173-190.
42. Schön, D. (1986). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
43. Songer, N. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 297-327.
44. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Swing, S. R., & Peterson, P. L. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small-group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 259-274.
46. Webb, N. (1980). A process-outcome analysis of learning in group and individual settings. Educational Psychologist, 15, 69-83.
47. Webb, N. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-40.
48. Webb, N., Neimer, K., Chizhik, A., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 607-651.
49. Webb, N., & Palincsar, A. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
50. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Zhao, Y, & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-840.