Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing

Design Studies

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 315-337

  Kan, Jeff W T ^a   Gero, John S ^b,c  

^a Faculty of Architecture   (Australia)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

case study; collaborative design; design studies; linkography; research methods

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; DATA REDUCTION; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PAPER; RANDOM VARIABLES;

COLLABORATIVE DESIGNING; ELSEVIER (CO); ENTROPY MEASURES; INDIVIDUAL (PSS 544-7); LINKOGRAPHY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHANNON'S ENTROPY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 46649094990     PISSN: 0142694X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Akaike H. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B., and Csaki C. (Eds). Second international symposium on information theory (1973), Akademiai Kiado, Budapest 267-281
2. Bly S.A., and Minneman S.L. Commune: a shared drawing surface. Office Information Systems (1990), Massachusetts, Cambridge pp 184-192
3. Cross N., and Clayburn Cross A. Observations of teamwork and social processes in design. Design Studies Vol 16 No 2 (1995) 143-170
4. Dorst K. On the problem of design problems-problem solving and design expertise. Journal of Design Research Vol 4 No 3 (2004)
5. Finke R.A., Ward T.B., and Smith S.M. Creative cognition (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Gabriel G.C. Computer mediated collaborative design in architecture: the effects of communication channels in collaborative design communication [i.e. communication]. Architecture (2000), University of Sydney, Sydney
7. Goldschmidt G. Linkography: assessing design productivity. In: Trappl R. (Ed). Cyberbetics and system '90 (1990), World Scientific, Singapore 291-298
8. Goldschmidt G. Criteria for design evaluation: a process-oriented paradigm. In: Kalay Y.E. (Ed). Evaluating and predicting design performance (1992), John Wiley & Son Inc., New York 67-79
9. Goldschmidt G. The designer as a team of one. Design Studies Vol 16 No 2 (1995) 189-209
10. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P., and Morgan J.L. (Eds). Syntax and semantics, volume 3 speech acts Vol 3 (1975), Academic Press, New York 41-48
11. th ANZAScA, Tasmania, Australia pp 111-117
12. Kan, W T and Gero, J S (2005) Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing?, in CAADRIA05, New Delhi, India, Vol 1, pp 451-457
13. McNeill T., Gero J.S., and Warren J. Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design Vol 10 No 3 (1998) 129-140
14. Miller G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review Vol 63 (1956) 81-97
15. Olson G.M., and Olson J.S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction Vol 15 No 2/3 (2000) 130-178
16. Oslon G.M., Oslon J.S., Carter M.R., and Storrosten M. Small group design meetings: an analysis of collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction Vol 7 No 4 (1992) 347-374
17. Pavitt C., and Johnson K.K. An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research Vol 26 No 3 (1999) 303-321
18. Salter A., and Gann D. Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design. Research Policy Vol 32 No 8 (2002) 1309-1324
19. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948) 397-423
20. Van-der-Lugt R. Developing a graphic tool for creative problem solving in design groups. Design Studies Vol 21 No 5 (2000) 505-522
21. Van-der-Lugt R. Relating the quality of the idea generation process to the quality of the resulting design ideas. International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED) (2003), Stockholm, Sweden pp 19-21
22. Vera A.H., Kvan T., West R.L., and Lai S. Expertise and collaborative design (1998), CHI '98, Los Angeles pp 503-510
23. Zolin R., Hinds P.J., Fruchter R., and Levitt R.E. Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: a longitudinal study. Information and Organization Vol 14 No 1 (2004) 1-26