Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology

Computers and Education

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 740-762

  Koehler, Matthew J ^a   Mishra, Punya ^a   Yahya, Kurnia ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperative collaborative learning; Earning communities; Evaluation methodologies; Pedagogical issues; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; TEACHING;

COOPERATIVE/COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; EARNING COMMUNITIES; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGIES;

TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

EID: 34248650963     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Berelson B. Content analysis in communication research (1952), Free Press, Illinois
2. Blumenfeld P.C., Soloway E., Marx R., Krajcik J., Guzdial M., and Palincsar A. Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 26 3&4 (1991) 369-398
3. Brand G. What research says: training teachers for using technology. Journal of Staff Development 19 1 (1997) 10-13. http://www.nsdc.org/library/jsd/brand191.html Retrieved June 28, 2004, from
4. Bromley H. Introduction: data-driven democracy? Social assessment of educational computing. In: Bromley H., and Apple M. (Eds). Education, technology, ower (1998), SUNY Press, Albany, NY 1-28
5. Brown A.L. Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2 2 (1992) 141-178
6. Bruce B., and Levin J. Educational technology: media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17 1 (1997) 79-102
7. Bruce B.C. Innovation and social change. In: Bruce B.C., Peyton J.K., and Batson T. (Eds). Network-based classrooms (1993), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 9-32
8. Carver S.M., Lehrer R., Connell T., and Erickson J. Learning by hypermedia design: issues of assessment and implementation. Educational Psychologist 27 3 (1992) 385-404
9. Cobb P., Confrey J., diSessa A., Lehrer R., and Schauble L. Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher 32 1 (2003) 9-13
10. Design-Based Research Collective. Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher 32 1 (2003) 5-8
11. Dewey J., and Bentley A.F. Knowing and the known (1949), Beacon, Boston, MA
12. Fenstermacher G.D. The knower and the known: the nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In: Darling-Hammond L. (Ed). Review of research in education vol. 20 (1994), American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC 3-56
13. Flanders N. Analyzing teacher behavior (1970), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
14. Fulton, K., Glenn, A., & Valdez, G. (2003). Three preservice programs preparing tomorrow's teachers to use technology: a study in partnerships. Retrieved on June 29, 2004, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/preservice/.
15. Fulton, K., Glenn, A., Valdez, G., & Blomeyer, R. (2002). Preparing technology-competent teachers for urban and rural classrooms: a teacher education challenge. Retrieved on June 29, 2004, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/challenge.
16. Hacker D.J., and Niederhauser D.S. Promoting deep and durable learning in the online classroom. In: Weiss R.E., Knowlton D.S., and Speck B.W. (Eds). Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom (2000), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 53-64 [ED447767]
17. Handler M.G., and Strudler N. The ISTE foundation standards: issues of implementation. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 13 2 (1997) 16-23
18. Harasim L.M. Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 16 2 (1987) 117-135
19. Harel I., and Papert S. Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments 1 1 (1990) 1-32
20. Hickman L.A. John Dewey's pragmatic technology (1990), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN
21. Hughes J.E. The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13 2 (2005) 377-402
22. Iseke-Barnes J.M. Issues of educational uses of the Internet: power and criticism in communications and searching. Journal of Educational Computing Research 15 1 (1996) 1-23
23. Kafai Y. Learning design by making games: children's development of design strategies in the creation of a complex computational artifact. In: Kafai Y., and Resnick M. (Eds). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 71-96
24. Kafai Y.B. Minds in play: computer game design as a context for children's learning (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
25. Kafai Y.B., and Resnick M. Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
26. Keating, T., & Evans, E. (2001, April). Three computers in the back of the classroom: Pre-service teachers' conceptions of technology integration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
27. Koehler M.J., and Mishra P. Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 21 3 (2005) 94-102
28. Koehler M.J., and Mishra P. What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research 32 2 (2005) 131-152
29. Koehler M.J., Mishra P., Hershey K., and Peruski L. With a little help from your students: a new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 12 1 (2004) 25-55
30. Koehler, M. J. (2003). Transcripts from a design experiment. Available from http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu/MattWeb/Data/DesignExperimentTranscripts.html.
31. Lehrer R. Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In: Lajoie S., and Derry S. (Eds). Computers as cognitive tools (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ
32. Levin J.A., Kim H., and Riel M.M. Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In: Harasim L.M. (Ed). Online education: perspectives on a new environment (1990), Praeger, New York, NY 185-214
33. Loucks-Horsley S., Hewson P., Love N., and Stiles K. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (1997), Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA
34. Lundeberg M.A., Bergland M., Klyczek K., and Hoffman D. Using action research to develop preservice teachers' beliefs, knowledge and confidence about technology. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 1 4 (2003). http://ncolr.uidaho.com/jiol/archives/2003/spring/toc.asp Retrieved June 29, 2004, from
35. Margerum-Leys J., and Marx R. Teacher knowledge of educational technology: a study of student teacher/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research 26 4 (2002) 427-462
36. Mason R., and Romiskowski A. Computer-mediated communication. In: Jonassen D. (Ed). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (1996), Macmillan, New York
37. Milken Exchange on Education Technology (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? [Online]. Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://www.mff.org/publications/publications.taf?page=154.
38. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (in press). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record.
39. Mishra P., and Koehler M.J. Not "what" but "how:" Becoming design-wise about educational technology. In: Zhao Y. (Ed). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices (2003), Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT 99-122
40. Mishra P., Spiro R.J., and Feltovich P.J. Technology, representation, and cognition: The prefiguring of knowledge in cognitive flexibility hypertexts. In: van Oostendorp H., and de Mul S. (Eds). Advances in discourse processes Vol. LVII (1996), Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ 289-305
41. Mowrer D.E. A content analysis of student/instructor communication via computer conferencing. Higher Education 32 (1996) 217-241
42. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (1997). Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://www.ncate.org/projects/tech/TECH.HTM.
43. Niederhauser D.S., and Stoddart T. Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education 17 1 (2001) 15-31
44. Niederhauser D.S., Salem D.J., and Fields M. Exploring teaching, learning, and instructional reform in an introductory technology course. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 7 2 (1999) 153-172
45. Potter W., and Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research 27 (1999) 258-284
46. Riffe D., Lacy S., and Fico F. Analyzing media messages: quantitative content analysis (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, New Jersey
47. Rosenblatt L.M. The reader, the text, the poem: the transactional theory of literary work (1978), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL
48. Rourke L., Anderson T., Garrison D.R., and Archer W. Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11 2 (2001) 8-22
49. Schulman L.S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15 2 (1986) 414
50. Schulman L.S. Knowledge and teaching: foundations for a new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57 1 (1987) 1-22
51. Schwandt T.A. Qualitative inquiry: a dictionary of terms (1997), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
52. Sinclair J., and Coulthard M. Towards an analysis of discourse (1975), Oxford University Press, London
53. Strudler N., and Wetzel K. Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development 47 4 (1999) 63-81
54. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
55. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved September 6, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000102.
56. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=1999080.
57. Zhao, Y., Conway, P., (2001). What's in and what's out?: An analysis of state technology plans. Teachers College Record. Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10717.
58. In: Zhao Y. (Ed). What should teachers know about technology: perspectives and practices (2003), Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT