Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 25-39

  Ertmer, Peggy A ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144533908     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02504683     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Albion, P. (2003). PBL + IMM = PBL2: Problem based learning and interactive multimedia development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 243-257. [Online]. Available: http://dl.aace.org/13564.
2. Albion, P., & Ertmer, P. A. (2002). Beyond the foundations: The role of vision and belief in teachers' preparation for integration of technology. TechTrends, 46(5), 34-38.
3. American Federation of Teachers. (1999). Block scheduling-Look before you leap. American Teacher. Retrieved March 15, 2002, from www.aft.org/ publications/american_teacher/sept99/block.html.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the National Technology Standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 489-507.
6. Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 291-321.
7. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Lurry Cuban right? [PDF file]. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved October 2, 2001, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc.
8. Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (1999). Teacher professionalism, school work culture and the emergence of constructivist-compatible pedagogies [PDF file]. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved October 2, 2002, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc.
9. Berg, S., Benz, C.R., Lasley, T. J., & Raisch, C. D. (1998). Exemplary technology use in elementary classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 111-122.
10. Block, J. H., & Hazelip, K. (1995). Teachers' beliefs and belief systems. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 25-28). New York: Pergammon.
11. Brownlee, P. P. (2000, September). Effecting transformational institutional change. The National Academy Newsletter, 1. Retrieved February 6, 2004, from http://www.thenationalacademy.org/Newsletters/voll-3.html.
12. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner, & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
13. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
14. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Cuban, L. (1997, May 21). High-tech schools and lowtech teaching. Education Week on the Web. Retrieved February 10, 2004, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-16/34cuban.h16.
16. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813-834.
17. Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 247-266.
18. Dede, C. (Ed.) (1998). Learning with technology: The 1998 ASCD Yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers' views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 221-238.
20. Downes, T. (1993). Student-teachers' experiences in using computers during teaching practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9, 17-33.
21. Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1990). Teacher beliefs and practices part 1: Patterns of change. The evolution of teachers' instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms (ACOT Report #8). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.
22. Elmore, R., Peterson, P., & McCarthy, S. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
24. Ertmer, P. A. (2001). Responsive instructional design: Scaffolding the adoption and change process. Educational Technology, 42(6), 33-38.
25. Ertmer, P. A., Conklin, D., Lewandowski, J., Osika, E., Selo, M., & Wignall, E. (2003). Increasing preservice teachers' capacity for technology integration through use of electronic models. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 95-112.
26. Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5). Available online at http://www.iste.org/jrte/33/5/ertmer.html.
27. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65.
28. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
29. Goodman, J. (1988). Constructing a practical philosophy of teaching: A study of preservice teachers' professional perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 121-137.
30. Grant, C. M. (1996). Professional development in a technological age: New definitions, old challenges, new resources. Retrieved April 11, 2003, from http://ra.terc.edu/publications/TERC_pubs/tech-infusion/prof_dev/prof_dev_intro. html.
31. Griffin, T. D, & Ohlsson, S. (2001, August). Beliefs vs. knowledge: A necessary distinction for predicting, explaining and assessing conceptual change. Presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved January 13, 2004, from http://tigger.uic.edu/tgriffin/.
32. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
33. Guskey, T. R. (1995). Results-oriented professional development: In search of an optimal mix of effective practices. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), Naperville, IL. Retrieved February 24, 2003, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/pdlitrev.htm.
34. Handler, M. G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computers and Education, 20, 147-156.
35. Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. (1995). Teaching with technology. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Theory into practice (pp. 155-170). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
36. Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Trans forming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 455-465.
37. International Society for Technology in Education. (2003). National education technology standards (NETS). Retrieved February 6, 2004, from http://cnets.iste.org/.
38. Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419-469.
39. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
40. Kane, R., Sandetto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72, 177-228.
41. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
42. Lumpe, A. T., & Chambers, E. (2001). Assessing teachers' context beliefs about technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 93-107.
43. Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 220-237.
44. Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & Regstad, N. G. (1996). Using subjective norms to predict teachers' computer use. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 33(1), 27-33.
45. Market Data Retrieval. (2002). Technology in education 2002. Shelton, CT: Market Data Retrieval.
46. Munby, H. (1982). The place of teachers' beliefs on research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternative methodology. Instructional Science, 11, 201-225.
47. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000, September). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology (Report No. NCES 2000102). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
48. National Staff Development Council. (2001). Standards for staff development (Rev. ed.). Oxford, OH: Author.
49. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(4), 317-328.
50. Newman, H. (2002, February 26). Computers used more to learn than teach. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved, April 29, 2002, from, http://www.freepress.com/ news/education/newman26_20020226.htm.
51. Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15-31.
52. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (1998). Block scheduling in North Carolina: Implementation, teaching, and impact issues. Raleigh, NC: Author.
53. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
54. Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers' beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57-76.
55. Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 1-40.
56. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
57. President's Panel on Educational Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
58. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
59. Rokeach, M. (1968). Belief, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Schunk, D. H. (2000). Learning theories: An educational perspective (3rd. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
62. Scott, S. M., Chovanec, D. M., & Young, B. (1994). Philosophy-in-action in university teaching. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 24(5), 1-25.
63. Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2001-2002). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachers respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 85-111.
64. U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Goafs 2000: Educate America Act, October 1996 Update. Retrieved March 4, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/G2K/g2k- fact.html.
65. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No child left behind Act of 2001. Retrieved July 31, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/asst.html.
66. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Federal funding for educational technology and how it is used in the classroom: A summary of findings from the Integrated Studies of Educational Technology. Office of the Under Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service: Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 6, 2004, from www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/evaluation.html.
67. Vacc, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers' changing beliefs and instructional use of children's mathematical thinking. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89-110.
68. Waters, J. T., Marzano, R. J., McNulty, B. A. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
69. Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89, 525-539.
70. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72, 131-175.
71. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.
72. Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5-30.
73. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-840.
74. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 482-515.