Emergence of epistemic agency in college level educational technology course for pre-service teachers engaged in CSCL

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 38-51

  Erkunt, Hamdi ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cognitive authority and responsibility; Epistemic agency; Knowledge building; Progressive inquiry; Social network analysis (SNA)

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957025251     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Open Court Chicago.
3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Toward research-based innovation. Innovating to learn, learning to innovate, OECD publications, 67-88.
4. Borgatti, S., Everett, M. & Freeman, L. (1996). UCINET IV Version 1.64 Reference Manual. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5. Borgatti, S., Everett, M. & Freeman, L. (1999). UCINET V User's Guide. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6. Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (ed.), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory & Classroom Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 229-270.
7. Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard Univ Pr.
8. Damşa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. (2010). Shared Epistemic Agency: An Empirical Study of an Emergent Construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186.
9. Erkunt, H. (2009). Developing Electronic Portfolios in a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environment. In Chang M. & C. Kuo (eds), Learning Culture and Language Through ICTs: Methods for Enhanced Instruction, Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc. 209-226.
10. Evensen, D.H. & C.E. Hmelo (eds.) (2000). Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
11. Frank, K. A. (1998). Quantitative methods for studying social context in multilevels and through interpersonal relations. Review of research in education, 23(1), 171-216.
12. Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Pursuit of explanation within a computer-supported classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 979-996.
13. Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213-231.
14. Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2003). Patterns of knowledge building in computer-supported inquiry. EARLI meeting on the social psychological dimension of social interaction and the effects of cultural backgrounds in CSCL. August, Padova, Italy.
15. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge, 175-188.
16. Knowledge Forum (2007). Retrieved in May 21, 2010 from http://www.knowledgeforum.com/Kforum/inAction.htm
17. Lee, H. S., & Butler, N. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923-948.
18. Muukkonen, H., & Lakkala, M. (2009). Exploring metaskills of knowledge-creating inquiry in higher education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 187-211.
19. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Technology-mediation and tutoring: How do they shape progressive inquiry discourse? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 527-565.
20. Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 143-175.
21. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557-576.
22. Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual review of psychology, 49(1), 345-375.
23. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Pr. 47-87.
24. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society. Chicago: Open Court. 67-98.
25. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the learning sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
26. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., and Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
27. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: SAGE Publications
28. Tollefsen, D. (2004). Collective epistemic agency. Southwest Philosophy Review, 20(1), 55-66.
29. van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175-220.
30. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.