What is design knowledge and how do we teach it?

Educating Learning Technology Designers: Guiding and Inspiring Creators of Innovative Educational Tools

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 19-35

  Hoadley, Christopher ^a,b   Cox, Charlie ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955228812     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203357217     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Adelson , B. (1989). Modeling software design within a problem-space architecture. In S. Newsome , W. Spillers , & S. Finger (Eds.), Design theory '88. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Alexander , C. , Ishikawa , S. , Silverstein , M. , Jacobson , M. , Fiksdahl-King , I. , & Angel , S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Anderson , J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192-210.
4. Apple Computer. (1987). Apple human interface guidelines: The Apple Desktop Interface. New York: Addison-Wesley.
5. Argyris , C. , & Schön , D. A. (1991). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness [1st Classic Paperback ed.]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
6. Boehm , B. W. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer, 21(5), 61-72.
7. Borenstein , N. S. (1991). Programming as if people mattered: Friendly programs, software engineering, and other noble delusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Boulanger , S. , & Smith , I. (2001). Multi-strategy workplace navigation for design education. Design Studies, 22(2), 111-140.
9. Clark , H. H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Collins , A. , Brown , J. S. , & Holum , A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator (Winter), 6-11, 38-46.
11. Cooper , A. , & Reimann , R. M. (2003). About face 2.0: The essentials of interaction design. New York: Wiley.
12. de Bono , E. (1999). Six thinking hats. New York: Back Bay Books.
13. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8, 35-37.
14. Dick , W. , Carey , L. , & Carey , J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
15. Ehn , P. (1989). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.
16. Fincher , S. , Petre , M. , & Clark , M. (2001). Computer science project work: principles and pragmatics. New York: Springer.
17. Flyvbjerg , B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again [ S. Sampson , Trans.]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Friedman , B. , & Kahn , P. H. Jr. (2000). A value-sensitive design approach to augmented reality. In W. E. Mackay (Ed.), DARE 2000: Design of augmented reality environments (pp. 163-164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Goel , V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Gould , J. D. , & Lewis , C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300-311.
21. Hartson , H. R. , & Hix , D. (1989). Human-computer interface development: Concepts and systems for its management. ACM Computing Surveys, 21(1), 5-92.
22. Hevner , A. R. , March , S. T. , Park , J. , & Ram , S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
23. Hoadley , C. (2002). Creating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCL. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning 2002 (pp. 453-462). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Hoadley , C. , & Cox , C. D. (2005, June 27). Educating reflective learner centered designers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005, Montréal, Canada.
25. Hoadley , C. , & Kim , D. E. (2003). Learning, design, and technology: Creation of a design studio for educational innovation. In A. Palma dos Reis & P. Isaís (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Society 2003 (pp. 510-519). Lisbon, Portugal: International Association for the Development of the Information Society.
26. Hutchins , E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Jackson , S. L. , Stratford , S. J. , Krajcik , J. , & Soloway , E. (1996). A Learner-centered tool for students building models. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 48-49.
28. Janis , I. L. (1988). Groupthink. In K. Ralph (Ed.), Managing professionals in innovative organizations: A collection of readings. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing/Harper & Row.
29. Kali , Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge building using a design principles database. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(2), 187-201.
30. Kelley , T. , & Littman , J. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm (1st ed.). New York: Currency/ Doubleday.
31. Kirsh , D. , & Maglio , P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513-549.
32. Koedinger , K. R. (1998). Intelligent cognitive tutors as modelling tool and instructional model: Position paper for the NCTM Standards 2000 Technology Conference. Retrieved September 6, 2000 , from http://www.carnegielearning.com/nctm2000.html.
33. Linn , M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.
34. Maeda , J. (2006). The laws of simplicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Moran , T. , & Carroll , J. (1996). Overview of design rationale. In T. Moran & J. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Muller , M. J. , & Czerwinski , M. (1999). Organizing usability work to fit the full product range. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 87-90.
37. Muller , M. J. , & Kuhn , S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 24-28.
38. Pea , R. , & Gomez , L. (1992). Distributed multimedia learning environments: Why and how? Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 73-109.
39. Rittel , H. , & Webber , M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
40. Scardamalia , M. , & Bereiter , C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
41. Schank , P. , Linn , M. C. , & Clancy , M. J. (1992). Supporting Pascal programming with an on-line template library and case studies. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(6), 1031-1048.
42. Schön , D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131-148.
43. Shina , S. G. (1991). Concurrent engineering: New rules for world-class companies. IEEE Spectrum, 28(7), 22-26.
44. Simon , H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Soloway , E. (1985). From problems to programs via plans: The content and structure of knowledge for introductory LISP programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(2), 157-172.
46. Soloway , E. , Guzdial , M. , & Hay , K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36-41.
47. Stone , D. L. , Jarrett , C. , Woodroffe , M. , & Minocha , S. (2005). User interface design and evaluation. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
48. Underwood , J. , Hoadley , C. , Stohl , H. , Hollebrands , K. , DiGiano , C. , & Renninger , K. A. (2005). IDEA: Identifying design principles in educational applets. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 99-112.
49. Whitford , F. (1984). Bauhaus. London: Thames and Hudson.