Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community

Instructional Science

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 429-452

  Zhang, Jianwei ^a   Sun, Yanqing ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Knowledge building community; Reading in content areas; Reading to learn; Scientific inquiry

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958283859     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-010-9135-4     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools (pp. 372-384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools (pp. 193-224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, T. H., West, C. K., Beck, D. P., McDonell, E. S., & Frisbie, D. S. (1997). Integrating reading and science education: On developing and evaluating WEE Science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(6), 711-733.
4. Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685-730.
6. Baker, L. (1991). Metacognition, reading, and science education. In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Science learning: Processes and applications (pp. 2-13). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
8. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987a). An attainable vision of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9-30.
11. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987b). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2005). Technology and literacies: From print literacy to dialogic literacy. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 749-761). Dordrecht: Springer.
13. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Cantoni-Harvey, G. (1987). Content-area language instruction: Approaches and strategies. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Bravo, M. A., & Barber, J. (2006). Reading and writing in the service of inquiry-based science. In R. Douglas, M. Klentschy, & K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 221-244). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
16. Chan, C. K. K., Burtis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 97-118.
17. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
18. Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378-411.
19. Collins, N. D. (1994). Metacognition and reading to learn. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication Digest #96.
20. Collins, A. (1998). Learning communities: A commentary on chapters by Brown, Ellery, and Campione, and by Riel. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 399-405). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Connolly, P., & Vilardi, T. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Denise, M. K. (1987). Structure strategies for comprehending expository text. Reading Research and Instruction, 27, 66-72.
24. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & S. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: APA Press.
25. Ebbers, M., & Rowell, P. (2002). Description is not enough: Scaffolding children's explanation. Primary Science Review, 74, 10-13.
26. Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Goldman, S. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23, 357-398.
28. Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Theories of text comprehension: The importance of reading strategies to theoretical foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Classroom contexts for engaged reading: An overview. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
31. Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Lindberg, N. (1989). A more equitable account of the note taking functions in learning from lecture and from text. Instructional Science, 18(3), 217-232.
32. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313-350.
33. Kuipers, B. (1994). Qualitative reasoning: Modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New technologies in early childhood literacy research: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 59-82.
35. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273-290.
37. Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Educational Research Journal, 26, 599-613.
38. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Olson, D. R. (1997). Talking about text and culture of literacy. In B. Davis & D. Corson (Eds.), Oral discourse and education (pp. 1-9). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
41. Padilla, M. J., Muth, K. D., & Padilla, R. K. (1991). Science and reading: Many process skills in common? In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Science learning: Processes and applications (pp. 14-19). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
42. Palincsar, A. S. (2003). Collaborative approaches to reading comprehension. In A. Sweet & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 99-115). New York: Guilford Press.
43. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal reaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
44. Palincsar, A. S., & Ladewski, B. (2006). Literacy and the learning sciences. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 299-317). New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of firsthand and text-based investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 151-194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Perencevich, K. C. (2004). How the CORI framework looks in the classroom. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 25-53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the reader's world meets the world on paper? International Journal of Science Education, 21, 317-327.
48. Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (2009). Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39, 313-319.
49. Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanations and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Analyzing collaborative discourse. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 187-204). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
52. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
53. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., & Smith Lea, N. (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45-71.
55. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Hewitt, J., & Webb, J. (1996). Constructive learning from texts in biology. In K. Fischer & M. Kirby (Eds.), Relations and biology learning: The acquisition and use of knowledge structures in biology (pp. 44-64). Berlin: Springer.
56. Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475-494.
57. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59. Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38, 247-271.
60. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2004). Communication patterns of engineers. New York: Wiley.
61. Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Reading as reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323-332.
62. Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2007). A knowledge-based framework for unifying content-area reading comprehension and reading comprehension strategies. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies (pp. 73-104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Wittrock, M. C. (1991). Generative teaching of comprehension. The Elementary School Journal, 92(2), 169-184.
65. Wixson, K. K., & Peters, C. W. (1984). Reading redefined: A Michigan Reading Association position paper. Michigan Reading Journal, 17, 4-7.
66. Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., Goldman, S. R., Hildebrand, G. M., Osborne, J. F., et al. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 347-352.
67. Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Prain, V. (2002). Scientists as writers. Science Education, 86(5), 672-692.
68. Zhang, J., & Messina, R. (2010). Collaborative productivity as self-sustaining processes in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. In Proceeding of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
69. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7-44.