Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, mathematics and science

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-275

  Ruthven, Kenneth ^a   Hennessy, Sara ^a   Brindley, Sue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer uses in education; Educational technology; England; Secondary education; Subject teaching and learning; Teacher attitude and cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842708988     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ball S. Bowe R. Subject departments and the 'implementation' of national curriculum policy: An overview of the issues Journal of Curriculum Studies 24 2 1992 97-115
2. Ball S. Lacey C. Revisiting Subject disciplines as the opportunity for group action: A measured critique of subject subcultures In Siskin L. Little J. (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school 1995 95-122 Teachers College Press New York, NY
3. Becker, H. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computer survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51).
4. Becker, H., Ravitz, J., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 National Survey Report #3. Irvine, CA: Centre for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California Irvine.
5. Bishop A.J. Mathematics education in its cultural context Educational Studies in Mathematics 19 2 1988 179-191
6. Boaler J. Experiencing school mathematics 1997 Open University Press Buckingham
7. Brown S. McIntyre D. Making sense of teaching 1993 Open University Press Buckingham
8. Calderhead J. Teachers: beliefs and knowledge In Berliner D. Calfee R. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology 1996 709-725 Simon & Schuster Macmillan New York, NY
9. Cooper P. McIntyre D. Effective teaching and learning: Teachers' and students' perspectives 1996 Open University Press Buckingham
10. Cuban L. Kirkpatrick H. Peck C. High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox American Educational Research Journal 38 4 2001 813-834
11. Deaney R. Ruthven K. Hennessy S. Pupil perspectives on the contribution of information and communication technology to teaching and learning in the secondary school Research Papers in Education 18 2 2003 141-165
12. Department for Education (DfE). (1995a). Information technology in the national curriculum. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO).
13. Department for Education [DfE]. (1995b). English in the national curriculum. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO).
14. Department for Education [DfE]. (1995c). Science in the national curriculum. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO).
15. Department for Education [DfE]. (1995d). Mathematics in the national curriculum. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO).
16. Donnelly J. Interpreting differences: The educational aims of teachers of science and history, and their implications Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 1 1999 17-41
17. Donnelly J. Departmental characteristics and the experience of secondary science teaching Educational Research 42 3 2000 261-273
18. Farr, R., & Moscovici, S. (Eds.), (1984). Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Glaser B.G. Strauss L.L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research 1967 Aldine Chicago, IL
20. Goodson I. Mangan J.M. Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers British Educational Research Journal 21 5 1995 613-628
21. Hadley M. Sheingold K. Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers' integration of computers American Journal of Education 101 1993 261-313
22. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, in press.
23. Johnson, D., & Millett, A. (Eds.), (1996). Implementing the mathematics national curriculum: Policy, politics and practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
24. Kerr S. Lever and fulcrum: Educational technology in teachers' thought and practice Teachers College Record 93 1 1991 114-136
25. Kitzinger J. Barbour R. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice 1999 Sage London
26. Marland P.W. Implicit theories of teaching In Anderson L.W. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education 2nd ed 1995 131-136 Pergamon Oxford
27. Means B. Olson K. Technology and education reform 1997 Office of Educational Research and Improvement, US Department of Education Washington, DC
28. Miller L. Olson J. Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology Journal of Curriculum Studies 26 2 1994 121-141
29. Moscovici S. Social psychology and developmental psychology: continuing the conversation In Duveen G. Lloyd B. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge 1990 164-185 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
30. Niederhauser D. Stoddart T. Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software Teaching and Teacher Education 17 1 2001 15-31
31. Ravitz, J., Becker, H., & Wong, Y. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among US teachers. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 National Survey Report #4. Irvine, CA: Centre for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California Irvine.
32. Ruthven K. Hennessy S. A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning Educational Studies in Mathematics 49 1 2002 47-88
33. Stodolsky S.S. Grossman P.L. The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects American Educational Research Journal 32 2 1995 227-249
34. Windschitl M. Sahl K. Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics and institutional culture American Educational Research Journal 39 1 2002 165-205