Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1235-1244

  Voogt, J ^a   Westbroek, H ^a   Handelzalts, A ^a   Walraven, A ^a   McKenney, S ^a   Pieters, J ^a   de Vries, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b HAN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative curriculum design; Curriculum innovation; Professional development; Teacher; Teacher learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052387796     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ball D., Cohen D. Reform by the book: what is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?. Educational Researcher 1996, 25(9):6-8. 14.
2. Bell B., Gilbert J. Teacher development: A model from science education 1996, Falmer Press, London.
3. Ben-Peretz M. The teacher-curriculum encounter 1990, State University of New York Press, Albany.
4. Borko H. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher 2004, 33:3-15.
5. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school 2000, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. expanded ed. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, R.R. Cocking (Eds.).
6. Clandinin J., Connelly F. Teacher as curriculum maker. Handbook of research on curriculum 1992, 363-401. Macmillan, New York. P. Jackson (Ed.).
7. Clarke D., Hollingsworth H. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education 2002, 18:947-967.
8. Cobb P. Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher 1994, 23:13-19.
9. Cochran-Smith M. Studying teacher education: what we know and need to know. Journal of Teacher Education 2005, 56(4):301-306.
10. Davis E.A., Krajcik J.S. Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher 2005, 34:3-14.
11. Drent M., Meelissen M. Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively?. Computers & Education 2008, 51(1):187-199.
12. Elmore R.F., Burney D. Investing in teacher learning. Teaching as the learning profession 1999, 236-291. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. L. Darling-Hammond, G. Sykes (Eds.).
13. Garet M.S., Porter A.C., Desimone L., Birman B.F., Yoon K.S. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal 2001, 38(4):915-945.
14. Greeno J.G. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist 1998, 53(1):5-26.
15. Guskey T.R. Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher 1986, 15(5):5-12.
16. Guskey T.R. Evaluating professional development 2000, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
17. Gustafson K., Branch R.M. Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development 1997, 45(3):73-89.
18. Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams. Doctoral thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.
19. Joyce B., Showers B. Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal 1995, Longman, White Plains, NY. 2nd ed.
20. Little J.W. Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday practice. Teaching and Teacher Education 2002, 18:917-946.
21. Loucks-Horsley S., Hewson P.W., Love N., Stiles K.E. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics 1998, Corwin Press, California.
22. Parke H.M., Coble C.R. Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: a model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1997, 34(8):773-789.
23. Penuel W.R., Fishman B.J., Yamaguchi R., Gallagher L.P. What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal 2007, 44(4):921-958.
24. Putnam R.P., Borko H. What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researcher 2000, 29(1):1-15.
25. Riel M., Becker H.J. Characteristics of teacher leaders for information and communication technology. International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education 2008, 397-417. Springer, New York. J. Voogt, G. Knezek (Eds.).
26. Schön D.A. Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions 1987, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
27. Simmie G.M. Teacher design teams (TDTs) - building capacity for innovation, learning and curriculum implementation in the continuing professional development of in-career teachers. Irish Educational Studies 2007, 26(2):163-176.
28. Snyder J., Bolin F., Zumwalt K. Curriculum implementation. Handbook of research on curriculum 1992, 402-435. Macmillan, New York. P. Jackson (Ed.).
29. Taba H. Curriculum development: Theory and practice 1962, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
30. Van den Akker J. The teacher as learner in curriculum implementation. Journal of Curriculum Studies 1988, 20(1):47-55.
31. Voogt J.M. A blended in-service arrangement for supporting science teachers in technology integration. Journal of Technology in Teacher Education 2010, 18(1):83-109.
32. Westbroek, H.B., de Vries, B., Walraven, A., Handelzalts, A., Voogt, J. Pieters, J.M., & McKenney, S.E. (under review). The practice of teacher involvement in collaborative design: conceptually informed, but empirically based? European Journal of Teacher Education.
33. Whitcomb J., Borko H., Liston D. Growing talent: professional development models and practices. Journal of Teacher Education 2009, 60(3):207-212.
34. Yin R.K. Case study research: Design and methods 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks. 3rd ed.
35. Baildon M., Damico J. Negotiating epistemological challenges in thinking and practice: a case study of a literacy and inquiry tool as a mediator of professional conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education 2008, 24:1645-1657.
36. Deketelaere A., Kelchtermans G. Collaborative curriculum development: an encounter of different professional knowledge systems. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 1996, 2:71-85.
37. Fernandez C. Lesson study: a means for elementary teachers to develop the knowledge of mathematics needed for reform-minded teaching?. Mathematical Thinking and Leaning 2005, 7:265-289.
38. George J.M., Lubben F. Facilitating teachers' professional growth through their involvement in creating context-based materials in science. International Journal of Educational Development 2002, 22:659-672.
39. Parchmann I., Gräsel P.I., Baer A., Nentwig P., Demuth R., Ralle B. Chemie im Kontext - a symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28:1041-1062.
40. Rock T.C., Wilson C. Improving teaching through lesson study. Teacher Education Quarterly 2005, 32(1):77-92.
41. Schneider R., Pickett M. Bridging engineering and science teaching: a collaborative effort to design instruction for college students. School Science and Mathematics 2006, 106(6):259-266.
42. Shkedi A. School-based workshops for teacher participation in curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum Studies 1996, 28:699-711.
43. Voogt J., Almekinders M., Van den Akker J., Moonen B. A blended in-service arrangement for classroom technology integration: impacts on teachers and students. Computers in Human Behavior 2005, 21(3):523-539.