Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?

Educational Researcher

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 16-25

  Anderson, Terry ^a   Shattuck, Julie ^b  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Centre for Distributed Learning   (United States)

Author keywords

classroom research; design based research; mixed methods; research utilization; teacher research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856565275     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AndersonT. (2005). Design-based research and its application to a call center innovation in distance education. Canadian Journal of Learn-ing and Technology, 31(2), 69-84. Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/dspace/bitstream/2149/741/1/design_based_research.pdf.
2. Angeli C.,Valanides N.Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK).Computers and Education. 2009;52 (1): 154-168.
3. AndersonT.McConkeyB. (2009). Development of disruptive open access journals. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 39(3), 71-87. Retrieved from http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/cjhe/article/view/477.
4. Barab S.A.,Sadler T.D.,Heiselt C.,Hickey D.,Zuiker S.Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play.Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2007;16 (1): 59-82.
5. BarabS.SquireB. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. Retrieved from http://website.education.wisc.edu/kdsquire/manuscripts/jls-barab-squire-design.pdf.
6. Barab S.,Thomas M.,Dodge T.,Carteaux R.,Tuzun H.Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns.Educational Technology Research and Development. 2005;53 (1): 86-107.
7. Barab S.,Zuiker S.,Warren S.,Hickey D.,Ingram-Goble A.,Kwon E.-J.,Kouper I.,Herring S.C.Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts.Science Education. 2007;91 (5): 750-782.
8. Bodzin A.M.The implementation of a geospatial information technology (GIT)-supported land use change curriculum with urban middle school learners to promote spatial thinking.Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2011;48 (3): 281-300.
9. Boydston J.John Dewey: The early works. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 1971:.
10. Brown A.Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings.Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1992;2 (2): 141-178.
11. Christensen C.,Horn M.,Johnson C.Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008:.
12. CobbP.ConfreyJ.diSessaA.LehrerR.SchaubleL. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. Retrieved from http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Journals_and_Publications/Journals/Educational_Researcher/3201/3201_Cobb.pdf.
13. ColeR.PuraoS.RossiM.SeinM.K. (2005, December). Being proactive: Where action research meets design research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.83.956&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
14. Collins A.,Joseph D.,Bielaczyc K.Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues.Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2004;13 (1): 15-42.
15. Conceicao S.,Sherry L.,Gibson D.Using developmental research to design, develop and evaluate an urban education portal.Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 2004;15 (3): 271-286.
16. Harzing A.W.Publish or perish. Melbourne, Australia: Tarma Software Research; 2010:.
17. Harzing A.W.,van der Wal R.Google Scholar: The democratization of citation analysis.Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 2008;8 (1): 61-73.
18. HerringtonJ.McKenneyS.ReevesT.C.OliverR. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. Retrieved from www.editlib.org/d/25967/proceeding_25967.pdf.
19. Jahnke I.Dynamics of social roles in a knowledge management community.Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26 (4): 533-546.
20. Ketelhut D.The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment.Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2007;16 (1): 99-111.
21. Ketelhut D.J.,Nelson B.C.,Clarke J.,Dede C.A multi-user virtual environment for building higher order inquiry skills in science.British Journal of Educational Technology. 2010;41 (1): 56-68.
22. Klopfer E.,Squire K.Environmental detectives-The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations.Educational Technology Research and Development. 2008;56 (2): 203-228.
23. Koehler M.J.,Mishra P.,Yahya K.Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education; 2007; 2007. 740.
24. Kuhn G.,Quigley A.Creating practical knowledge through action research. Quigley A.Kuhne G., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997:23-40.
25. Looi C.-K.,Chen W.,Ng F.K.Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness.Computers and Education. 2010;54 (1): 14-26.
26. Maxcy S.J.Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:51-89.
27. Mingfong J.,Yam San C.,Ek Ming T.Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences; 2010:.
28. NorrisN. (1997). Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 172-176. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=345004&type=pdf&CFID=24643476&CFTOKEN=60339809.
29. Oha E.,Reeves T.The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners.Educational Media International. 2010;4 (47): 263-275.
30. OnwuegbuzieA.LeechN. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron?Quality and Quantity, 41(2), 233-249. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3.
31. ReevesT. (2000, April). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through "design experiments" and other developmental strategies. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Retrieved from http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/~treeves/AERA2000Reeves.pdf.
32. Reeves T.C.,Herrington J.,Oliver R.Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education.Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2005;16 (2): 96-115.
33. RookM. (2010, November10.) Following a Design-Based Research Cycle. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/mdm392/blogs/design/2010/11/following-a-design-based-research-cycle.html.
34. StappersP.J. (2007). Doing design as a part of doing research. In MichelR. (Ed.), Design research now (pp. 81-91). Basel, UK: Birkhauser. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_6.
35. Stokes D.Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1997:.
36. TiberghienA.VinceJ.GaidiozP. (2009). Design-based research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2275-2314. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/09500690902874894.
37. Timulak L.Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy.Psychotherapy Research. 2009;19 (4/5): 591-600.
38. Zhang J.,Scardamalia M.,Reeve R.,Messina R.Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities.Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2009;18 (1): 7-44.